Interesting view. Would you say you are now blinded to the facts on the ground?
I will pose this question: what is greater: that what is made or the maker?
I will also answer from your own book of faith:
Woe [to] him who is striving with his Former | (A potsherd with potsherds of the ground!) Does clay say to its Framer, What [are] you doing? And your work, He has no hands?
Does the potter not have authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honor and one to dishonor?
WHO made the USA? Clearly, it is THE PEOPLE. And therefor, with regards to the USA, The People are The Sovereign. Hence, the basis on which the USA is formed and framed (Constitution): 18 USC 241/242.
You are the Sovereign of your life. Your choices.....
Within this delegated jurisdiction, we are capable of sovereignty if we choose to claim it.
David was acknowledged as a king.
Is there something fundamentally different between him and we short of his willingness to subject himself to those responsibilities?
What makes a king (sovereign) a king?
How is God King of Kings if there are no sovereigns?
If there are sovereigns, and they just can’t be us, why are we not able to be kings when Revelation 1:6 says we are a nation of kings and priests?
What’s the missing context there?
I’m not a fan of the “name it and claim it” mindset - to my mind, it’s a false teaching -, but this is one area where it seems applicable in a more literal sense.
We are not sovereign.
We are fallen mortal people.
God is Sovereign.
Interesting view. Would you say you are now blinded to the facts on the ground?
I will pose this question: what is greater: that what is made or the maker?
I will also answer from your own book of faith:
WHO made the USA? Clearly, it is THE PEOPLE. And therefor, with regards to the USA, The People are The Sovereign. Hence, the basis on which the USA is formed and framed (Constitution): 18 USC 241/242.
You are the Sovereign of your life. Your choices.....
God is the King of Kings.
Sovereignty is subject to jurisdiction.
God’s jurisdiction is the highest.
Within this delegated jurisdiction, we are capable of sovereignty if we choose to claim it.
David was acknowledged as a king.
Is there something fundamentally different between him and we short of his willingness to subject himself to those responsibilities?
What makes a king (sovereign) a king?
How is God King of Kings if there are no sovereigns?
If there are sovereigns, and they just can’t be us, why are we not able to be kings when Revelation 1:6 says we are a nation of kings and priests?
What’s the missing context there?
I’m not a fan of the “name it and claim it” mindset - to my mind, it’s a false teaching -, but this is one area where it seems applicable in a more literal sense.
The Founding Fathers never called us sovereign.
We The People are sovereign.
But US citizens are not We The People.
You have to change your civil status to American State National/State Citizen in order to be part of We The People.
If we gave them authority, and their authority is admittedly delegated, then who is the sovereign in america?
Who “delegates/grants authority”, the king or the subject?