And what would it matter if they were? Seems like this might also be misdirection - see, squirrel! - while there is something more important happening somewhere else.
IDK what PDW is but full transparency: I followed the link from Godlike Productions.
As I said, “Interdasting,” did not say I believe it. But to clarify MY meaning, (and no one else’s), what I find interesting is the backlash/doubt being cast upon Candace Owens within a week of her convo with Ye, who was also discredited following his outspokenness about (((them))).
Again, I neither confirm or deny the video’s claims; merely found it Interdasting.
They're not quite as refined or "serious" as GA when it comes to research and what we talk about here.
The main issue is forum/topic slide and dilution of important posts that steal the exposure and attention away discussing goofy shit like stunt doubles...
Thank you for the clarification. I do find it confusing as to what is and what is not considered a slide or dilution of important posts here on GAW. I mean I see a lot of re-posts of Twitter posts, links from YouTube, Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, and American Thinker, et al, occasional links to Rumble and Bitchute, occasional personal posts, daily a number of Great Awakening memes, and even some straight up shitposts—-all of which I personally can appreciate, whether deadly serious, hysterically funny, simply amusing, highly doubtful, or (apparent) “gospel truth.” Just how is an anon to know?
Most of those MSM/X links are linked because they contain COMs. Sometimes COMs for normies, sometimes for anons and sometimes for the cabal. This is where we often look to Q drops to find out which. For instance:
I guarantee you'll learn so much you didn't know about what is really going on ... and Q and why things are the way they are here in relation to discernment will become clear.
This is the type of stuff that is posted into forums with the specific aim of either sliding or discrediting the forum.
MSM headlines “Unhinged Q cult forum believes Candace Owens is really Hally Berry wearing a mask”.
Etc.
Mods should come down like a tonne of bricks on this type of time wasting/ sliding/ bs posting. The ops past posting leans me towards bad judgement rather than agenda.
Ffs…
They are over twenty years apart in age. Candace Owens has eye spacing and nose width that are very distinct.
their faces are not alike... what kind of retard shit is this?
I'm not seing it. Seems a bit paranoid. What is the advantage of these 2 people actually being 1?
And what would it matter if they were? Seems like this might also be misdirection - see, squirrel! - while there is something more important happening somewhere else.
Stolen from PDW?
Kooky bs like this belongs there...we don't need to be associated with bs like this... We've got serious things to focus on.
IDK what PDW is but full transparency: I followed the link from Godlike Productions.
As I said, “Interdasting,” did not say I believe it. But to clarify MY meaning, (and no one else’s), what I find interesting is the backlash/doubt being cast upon Candace Owens within a week of her convo with Ye, who was also discredited following his outspokenness about (((them))).
Again, I neither confirm or deny the video’s claims; merely found it Interdasting.
Patriots Dot Win...
They're not quite as refined or "serious" as GA when it comes to research and what we talk about here.
The main issue is forum/topic slide and dilution of important posts that steal the exposure and attention away discussing goofy shit like stunt doubles...
Yanno...
Thank you for the clarification. I do find it confusing as to what is and what is not considered a slide or dilution of important posts here on GAW. I mean I see a lot of re-posts of Twitter posts, links from YouTube, Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, and American Thinker, et al, occasional links to Rumble and Bitchute, occasional personal posts, daily a number of Great Awakening memes, and even some straight up shitposts—-all of which I personally can appreciate, whether deadly serious, hysterically funny, simply amusing, highly doubtful, or (apparent) “gospel truth.” Just how is an anon to know?
No worries...
Most of those MSM/X links are linked because they contain COMs. Sometimes COMs for normies, sometimes for anons and sometimes for the cabal. This is where we often look to Q drops to find out which. For instance:
u/#q70
Here's some pointings for you to expand your understanding:
https://badlands.substack.com/ - Read anything and everything by Joe Lange & The Q for Dummies series is very, very good.
https://badlands.substack.com/p/q-for-dummies-chapter-1
https://badlands.substack.com/p/we-are-watching-a-movie
I guarantee you'll learn so much you didn't know about what is really going on ... and Q and why things are the way they are here in relation to discernment will become clear.
Cheers
Thank you, very much obliged!
No.
Can we do an early life of the YouTuber? Last time he was in Isreal?
Shill, sliding away. Just checked him out, major clickbait well poisoning clown.
That would mean that HB is.. based? 😁
KEK! Perhaps…
No
This is the type of stuff that everyone can agree is… crazy.
Those are clearly two different people… yes they have some similarities but so does everyone… I seen the same people … in all people … constantly.
It’s just the way it is lol
This is the type of stuff that is posted into forums with the specific aim of either sliding or discrediting the forum.
MSM headlines “Unhinged Q cult forum believes Candace Owens is really Hally Berry wearing a mask”.
Etc.
Mods should come down like a tonne of bricks on this type of time wasting/ sliding/ bs posting. The ops past posting leans me towards bad judgement rather than agenda.
Their noses are completely dis-similar. I call BS as well.
This is ridiculous. Maybe even racist. What crock of crap.
Just…Interdasting. 🧐