I researched it once, how many time in actual combat real soldiers or marines actually fire their weapons in full auto mode. The answer I gleaned was almost never. Full auto mode was very inaccurate with poor shot placement, and waste of ammo. Almost all the time, real warriors used their weapon in single shot mode, (not even three round burst mode)
I should have saved article. Maybe I will look for it again.
This is honestly most likely a semi auto weapon using a forced reset trigger. Just like the media, even objective folks don't understand gun lingo. Thus, everything that rapid fires is a "Glock Switch". In this case, Glock switches only work on Glocks. This was an Anderson AR, so it had to be an FRT since ATF has made those the hill to die on.
Great catch!
I'm pretty sure the NFA has "constructive possession"allowances, which means if you even own a PART of a "machine gun" - such as a Glock switch, auto-sear, or heaven forbid, an actual full-auto receiver (say an M16 receiver, even if it was stripped to just bare metal); merely possessing that item is an NFA violation.
Same as if you possessed a tube & washers; in the eyes of the ATF, you CLEARLY are trying to construct a suppressor. π
Again; that's just my understanding & I could be mistaken..... but it would explain the case; maybe he had the glock switch in the same bag as his .300?
However, it is a totally egregious & inexcusable error for the court to call the Andersen a "machine gun" if it wasn't actually, and if the case is more about the glock switch.
Oh, BTW:
can anyone remind me how many gang members have faced life in prison because of these switches?
However, it is a totally egregious & inexcusable error for the court to call the Andersen a "machine gun" if it wasn't actually, and if the case is more about the glock switch
All by design to feed the sheep (who don't pay attention) more BS about those scary semi-auto AR's ...
And look at how the fucking ATF treated this good, decent, normal, law-abiding citizen, all over some chunks of wood & metal:
On August 27, 2009, Jesus Amador, Jr., was arrested by an undercover officer when he sought to sell his Heckler and Koch SP89 pistol. But, one can legally sell an H&K SP89, so whatβs the twist?
Unfortunately for Mr. Amador, he was selling the H&K SP89 with the accessories that he collected for it, which included a vertical front grip and a shoulder stock. If Mr. Amador merely possessed the vertical grip, the pistol would have to be registered under the NFA as an AOW. However, because he also had a stock, the pistol would have to be registered as a short-barreled rifle, PRIOR to purchasing or possessing the shoulder stock and/or vertical grip.
Mr. Amador posted the following on the FloridaGunTrader website,
Well folks my name is Jesus Amador, you out there might just know me as Digitalage03, i recently met up with a prospected buyer for my sp89 clone pistol, well turns out the guy was a undercover cop and the reason he wanted to meet up with me is because he saw that i was selling the pistol with a stock as one of the accessories, which by the way it was never on the gun and it is legal to own, you just cant install it without a tax stamp, well anyways once i met up with him not only did i get slammed to the ground and had about 7 armed cops (one of which) had a loaded 12ga to the back of my head while on the ground handcuffed they also illegally searched my car and even had the balls to drive off in my car from private property to a public place so they can tear thru it before the towtruck came and got , Well anyone here that know thier laws about this know they are in serious trouble, considering that the basis of all this is a misinformed sherriff called Mike Scott. Anyone out there that would like to help in this matter not because of me, but because if you are SICK and tired off all these power hungry cops screwing with your right feel free to contact me at (239)961-4208 if you want to read the liberal BS version on how it happend google Jesus Amador Lee County. Also just for the record i at all times stated it was a pistol, never had the stock or grip on the pistol, notified the person it was illegal to put on without a stamp and even was going to assist in LEGALLY getting a sbr stamp thru a FFL , and of course i asked about if they where a florida resident as well as if they can legally own a gun. So in short i will have thier ass, any suggestions out there?
Mr. Amador even posted pictures of his mugshot and more telling, a picture of the SP89 with all accessories in a case. Most damning for Mr. Amador, other than being caught in possession of the SP89 with the shoulder stock and vertical grip is the fact that the case has a cut out for the SP89 to be placed in the case WITH the vertical foregrip, which would seem to connote, contrary to his position, that the SP89 was fitted with the foregrip at one point. For a picture of the case with the SP89 and accessories, see here.
Something is odd with this deal.
The Anderson AM-15 isn't a machine gun. It's basically a lower budget semi-auto AR15 chambered in .300 blackout.
Now the "Glock switch" is a different story and is illegal to own without proper license/permit here in the USA.
However, the Glock switch is made for......drum roll please....a Glock.
Could they just be classifying any machine gun conversion kits under the label "Glock switch"?
what about blue jean belt loops?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ0jTMLK9jI
I researched it once, how many time in actual combat real soldiers or marines actually fire their weapons in full auto mode. The answer I gleaned was almost never. Full auto mode was very inaccurate with poor shot placement, and waste of ammo. Almost all the time, real warriors used their weapon in single shot mode, (not even three round burst mode)
I should have saved article. Maybe I will look for it again.
IIRC ----- a 3 round burst is the desired setting
When we had to carry 12 to 18 20 rd mags we certainly we were concermed to conserve rounds.
Also a lot of jams on full auto when I was in during the 70s.
FKNG AWESOME RIGHT THERE
Not fake ---- one of my kids can do this quite well.
You have to aim from the hip ----- and have extra money to spend on ammo.
Belt loops will now be banned because they are machine guns. Thanks a lot. Kek
Bump loops?
I'm gonna have to manufacture an 18"-24" optics riser for better accuracy....kek
laser
This is honestly most likely a semi auto weapon using a forced reset trigger. Just like the media, even objective folks don't understand gun lingo. Thus, everything that rapid fires is a "Glock Switch". In this case, Glock switches only work on Glocks. This was an Anderson AR, so it had to be an FRT since ATF has made those the hill to die on.
Auto sear would be a better wording as a Glock switch is made for a Glock only...
True, but the Glock switch went viral throughout the culture. Most have heard of that term by now. Idk just spitballin
Great catch! I'm pretty sure the NFA has "constructive possession"allowances, which means if you even own a PART of a "machine gun" - such as a Glock switch, auto-sear, or heaven forbid, an actual full-auto receiver (say an M16 receiver, even if it was stripped to just bare metal); merely possessing that item is an NFA violation.
Same as if you possessed a tube & washers; in the eyes of the ATF, you CLEARLY are trying to construct a suppressor. π
Again; that's just my understanding & I could be mistaken..... but it would explain the case; maybe he had the glock switch in the same bag as his .300?
However, it is a totally egregious & inexcusable error for the court to call the Andersen a "machine gun" if it wasn't actually, and if the case is more about the glock switch.
Oh, BTW: can anyone remind me how many gang members have faced life in prison because of these switches?
Mobil 1....
Nuff said...kek
Oil filter? π²π€©π€·ββοΈππ§π«£
All by design to feed the sheep (who don't pay attention) more BS about those scary semi-auto AR's ...
Very true......!
Yep; appears I'm at least partially correct. here's an instance of constructive possession under the NFA:
https://blog.princelaw.com/2009/7/8/nfa-and-constructive-possession-myth-or-reality
Below quotes taken from this here: https://blog.princelaw.com/2009/9/1/florida-man-arrested-for-constructive-possession-of-an-sbr/
And look at how the fucking ATF treated this good, decent, normal, law-abiding citizen, all over some chunks of wood & metal:
X
Glock 18