I speculated in a earlier post on this subject. Were they willing "investors" or were their finances conscripted to purchase it while providing a vail for acquiring Twitter in the first place?
Saudi Prince Alwaleed? Wasn't most his $ taken away from him as part of his release deal? He must be WH controlled, and hence this investment isn't voluntary, right?
I've sold a lot of things and some real jerks might have bought them sometimes. So what? Is the check good is usually my bigger concern. I can be a jerk myself. Longtime ago I didn't like to sell to Republican's.
Also as interesting, Blackrock isn't an owner.
At least not directly, which front companies might they be behind that are invested in Twitter.
Yet
Notice on page 4 - 'Q Tetris Holding LLC'
Is this our buddy Q, referencing a game where you 'put the pieces together'?
Remember the video game QBert? A part of Trump tower looks like that game.
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/KF1K14/looking-up-at-the-trump-tower-in-manhattan-new-york-city-under-blue-KF1K14.jpg
Edit: Qbert game https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5e/Qbert.png
Holy bonk @!#?@!
Anons haven’t picked up on the Trump tower Qbert thing yet.
I speculated in a earlier post on this subject. Were they willing "investors" or were their finances conscripted to purchase it while providing a vail for acquiring Twitter in the first place?
EO 13818?
Sounds like it to me.
And EO 13848
Saudi Prince Alwaleed? Wasn't most his $ taken away from him as part of his release deal? He must be WH controlled, and hence this investment isn't voluntary, right?
that is the story that i prefer. it acually makes sense.
After looking through the list seems like theyre all playing some kind of game
Bandera Fund. I wonder if any reference to an ideological leader of ukrainian nazi movement Stepan Bandera
I've sold a lot of things and some real jerks might have bought them sometimes. So what? Is the check good is usually my bigger concern. I can be a jerk myself. Longtime ago I didn't like to sell to Republican's.