This clip/post is the NAIL IN THE COFFIN for Andrew Tate... N-G-M-I.
(twitter.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Anything it takes, to make him stop revealing truths. Better go listen to Candace Owens interviews with the Tate brothers before you swallow media narrative hook line and sinker. Edit: I can see that there is a lot of Tate interview material I have never heard. My bad.
In the video. He literally says he’s having sex with underage girls. how much more proof do you need for somebody to tell you that they literally abuse women, brainwash them, and have them do sexual acts on camera, and make money off of them. AND has sex with children 🤷♀️
Even if, these women were of age, (and they are not) he is still a disgusting garbage human being who preys on women who are vulnerable.
ANDREW TATE
All I’m doing is providing research that I’ve done myself. Think what you want to think. I will not be replying to anybody. Facts are facts.
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/16biw1Ti4f/andrew-tate-is-a-garbage-human-b/c
Here’s the breakdown of the video
0:10:36 The Official Charges
0:20:15 Is the Accusation About Tiktok Videos?
0:29:37 The Loverboy Method Explained
0:40:47 Why Didn't This Come Out Long Ago?
0:43:37 Messages From an Escaping Victim
0:54:04 Evidence for Threats of Violence
0:59:14 Andrew Tate Self-Snitching (Clear Proof of Lies)
01:09:35 What Criminal Lawyer Bruce Rivers Says
01:14:11 Witness Statements
01:19:49 EVIDENCE: Message Transcripts
01:24:25 Jeffrey Epstein vs Andrew Tate
01:32:13 Crimes Committed in 2022 - Detailed
01:40:55 When Women Deceive Men
01:43:01 Cardi B vs Andrew Tate
01:49:07 Was Tucker Carlson Neutral
02:05:15 THIS IS HUMAN TRAFFICKING
02:14:57 More Lies by Andrew Tate
02:22:37 Grooming a 15-year-old & More Self-Snitching
02:34:41 EVIDENCE: Message Transcripts Continued
02:53:19 Weakling David Wood Leaves
02:54:14 Romanian Law on Human Trafficking
02:57:12 Clear Proof Andrew is Lying
02:59:50 More Transcripts
03:04:08 Read the Indictment For Yourself
03:06:30 Super Chats
03:13:15 The Hypocrisy of Many Conservative
03:18:30 Left vs Right and "the Matrix"
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bj0aB5lP/a-brief-essay-showcasing-strong-/
Andrew Tate is a con artist
https://youtu.be/uLqCS0esFPE
Andrew Tate talks about how he enjoys scamming men and women out of their money, and brags about it.
https://youtu.be/WKibLhAGP1A
Here is one of his close friends: Vlad Obu, which may be short for something. Also goes by Joe Lampton. Reportedly he's a close confidant of Andrew Tate, and was even arrested last year along with him--human trafficking. Here's just a few examples of what he truly thinks, from a mole in his private group.
https://twitter.com/rox_emy/status/1663327779549507588
He's on Twitter as well, by the way. https://twitter.com/MrLottaHoes
Andrew Tate More from his own mouth on how he grooms underage girls using social media.
https://x.com/SalfordMe2023/status/1826176515169566934
I watched Tate originally on whatever podcast, and I saw an arrogant little shit that was getting worshipped on the podcast. I then came across the apostate prophet video of him, and the level of research those guys did is all I needed to see to make my judgment. He is a sex trafficker, and using the redpill community to hide his true intentions. The man is a con artist and a pedophile. Wolf in sheep's clothing. A good man would do nothing of what he is doing. Don't anchor to anyone on earth. Trust the Lord.
I’m so happy that you’ve seen the truth. There are so many whose eyes need to be opened. When Kandice Owens had him on her show, I knew that she was not a good person. She’s is also a sheep in wolf’s clothing - if you get my drift. She screams about the Jews, which she’s not wrong about, but then has this idiot on her show. Which totally invalidates what she says about the Jews. Almost like Alex Jones, who speaks the truth, but it’s so completely unhinged. You can’t share it with a normie!
Same Result in the end basically.
I have listened enough of her interview to reach the conclusion that she is a dangerous viper, one who is being hypocritical and untrustworthy, especially on the topic of human-trafficking and pedophilia.
On one hand, she attacks "the Jews" and Israel for being a pedophile ring.
On the other hand, she is running interference and sweeping all of the Tate's human trafficking and pedophile crimes underneath a rug, to the point she is intimidating and bullying pedophile victims, not to mention all of the lies she is cooking up to defend the Tates.
What could drive her to this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lpc_1_Hxg1c
This is a video that I have discovered and is quite interesting. It takes a deep-dive into the connections between Owens (and her very rich and aristocrat husband George Farmer) and Tate, information that I was not aware of until recently.
From the detective work and information presented in that video, I hypothesize that the Tates have very damning compromising material on Mr. Farmer (at the very least; would not be surprised if he has some compromising material on Ms. Owens too) and is using that material to blackmail Owens into becoming their PR lady. And I also am entertaining the hypothesis that Owens is a full accomplice and supporter to the Tates and their crimes (after all, I find it very unlikely for someone with a moral compass to remain "friends" with a vile person like Mr. Tate for many years (5+ years in Owens and Tate's case) after learning about his legally dubious activities).
Either way, I can not trust Ms. Owens to be truthful on anything if she is willing to lie and defend a criminal on something big like human-trafficking and pedophilia if they are an associate of her's.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyzXrZ6Spjk
This other video is from a duo of commentators (who tend to focus on male issues and being a role model for young men) who I come to respect. They provide additional video clips and information, but I want to focus on the comment they said in their comment's section (which I want to conclude this post with):