I disagree. The Trump-Biden debate was a setup. They were actually FAIR to Trump. They let sleepy Joe debate without his drug cocktail that makes him "coherent". They wanted him to falter, and be weak, and unelectable. The CNN panel immediately following the debate made it clear. They were united against him. They knew it could not possibly be stolen for him again.
For the debate, Kamala will have prepared answers or a prompter or an earpiece. Simple as that. I don't think they will be fair to Trump (as in most of his past debates). The mods will be biased, not based.
Kamala is not old and senile. They will absolutely attempt to steal the election in her name, 100%. They will make it appear that she is more popular than she is. They will unite completely and throw all of their resources into getting her elected, they have to at this point. To suddenly switch her with another candidate would be an impossible disaster for them at this point. It simply will not happen.
Quite a collection of points. I doubt there is a drug cocktail that authentically restores lost cognition. It would need to be capable of reconstructing nerve pathways, and would be worth a Nobel Prize. He was simply too far gone to save.
Kamala will try to cheat, but her recent performance indicates she cannot add 2 + 2 on the fly, even when the interlocutor is holding up 4 fingers. If she tries to lip-synch to a prompter, it will sound unnatural as hell. And she is so scatterbrained, I doubt she would have the good sense to avoid extemporaneous comments.
If Trump is clever (and he might be), the useful strategy might be a kind of Socratic dialogue that walks her off the plank. Or causes her to halt with the "Tilt!" sign flashing. People tend to underestimate Trump in accordance to their own conceptions of intellectual combat, and they forget that Trump's model of combat is not chess. It is boxing. I somewhat expect he will contrive a mental box that will cause Harris to lose her composure.
I disagree. The Trump-Biden debate was a setup. They were actually FAIR to Trump. They let sleepy Joe debate without his drug cocktail that makes him "coherent". They wanted him to falter, and be weak, and unelectable. The CNN panel immediately following the debate made it clear. They were united against him. They knew it could not possibly be stolen for him again. For the debate, Kamala will have prepared answers or a prompter or an earpiece. Simple as that. I don't think they will be fair to Trump (as in most of his past debates). The mods will be biased, not based. Kamala is not old and senile. They will absolutely attempt to steal the election in her name, 100%. They will make it appear that she is more popular than she is. They will unite completely and throw all of their resources into getting her elected, they have to at this point. To suddenly switch her with another candidate would be an impossible disaster for them at this point. It simply will not happen.
Logically thinking... well, you are correct. But many things from here on in might just defy all logic. We'll see.
Quite a collection of points. I doubt there is a drug cocktail that authentically restores lost cognition. It would need to be capable of reconstructing nerve pathways, and would be worth a Nobel Prize. He was simply too far gone to save.
Kamala will try to cheat, but her recent performance indicates she cannot add 2 + 2 on the fly, even when the interlocutor is holding up 4 fingers. If she tries to lip-synch to a prompter, it will sound unnatural as hell. And she is so scatterbrained, I doubt she would have the good sense to avoid extemporaneous comments.
If Trump is clever (and he might be), the useful strategy might be a kind of Socratic dialogue that walks her off the plank. Or causes her to halt with the "Tilt!" sign flashing. People tend to underestimate Trump in accordance to their own conceptions of intellectual combat, and they forget that Trump's model of combat is not chess. It is boxing. I somewhat expect he will contrive a mental box that will cause Harris to lose her composure.