I understand the Q proof. But I have to ask, what is it really proving?
What's the chance Hannity (or his staff) found the Q post and decided to do the "16 minutes 30 seconds" thing so as to tie into Q? The motive could be to have people talking about it, more views, renewed interest, etc.
I have seen many proofs where something ties back to something else... but it would have been easy for the person to coordinate with the Q post.
So, to me this is a Q proof that demonstrates that there are people aware of the Q posts.
What's the chance Hannity (or his staff) found the Q post and decided to do the "16 minutes 30 seconds" thing so as to tie into Q?
This wasn't out of the blue, though, Hannity suddenly announcing 16 minutes and 30 seconds. He was mocking Harris for doing an interview on CNN that lasted only that long.
I understand the Q proof. But I have to ask, what is it really proving?
What's the chance Hannity (or his staff) found the Q post and decided to do the "16 minutes 30 seconds" thing so as to tie into Q? The motive could be to have people talking about it, more views, renewed interest, etc.
I have seen many proofs where something ties back to something else... but it would have been easy for the person to coordinate with the Q post.
So, to me this is a Q proof that demonstrates that there are people aware of the Q posts.
You have the correct mindset.
I would agree. I give it "some" credence since he is sitting next to Trump, but easily coordinated.
This wasn't out of the blue, though, Hannity suddenly announcing 16 minutes and 30 seconds. He was mocking Harris for doing an interview on CNN that lasted only that long.
That's possible. But it is more plausible that that was partofthe script, and made to seem out of the blue.
You or I could have done that. Keep an eye on the clock andinterrupt yourself at the planned time.
Or the Patriots control him now like they control a lot of DS people