She did. She also did not answer if people were better off 4 years ago. That was one of the 1st questions. Her lack of response was likely enough for all the struggling Americans that MAY have been open minded to open their eyes and see She can't make life better for them.
Unfortunately it’s common, even with Trump, for politicians to not answer the specific question asked (trump was asked how he would remove the 11 or 21 million illegal immigrants and we got nothing). A candidate not answering only works if the opponent brings it up immediately. As soon as it was trumps turn he should have said, “you asked her if the economy is better off than 4 years ago; she ignored your question, because the answer is; it is not.”
She has been stealing his policy ideas. When she said he turned down 1500 border agents he should have asked her why she stopped funding for the wall. Trump needs to point out that the first time around Kamala and her friends held the majority and blocked most of his plans. They WANTED open borders.
In the case of his deportation plan, I can see where he wouldn't divulge too many details. Kinda like planning to go to war and laying your war plans out for the world to see - the healthcare issue - not so much. No reason we couldn't have details.
She didn't answer if she'd support abortions at 9,8, or even 7 months
Trump got cooked on abortion. I don't support abortion but the general voting women public does and he's getting crushed on it before, and tonight wasn't gonna help.
It's funny how different people can watch the same program and see two different things. I thought he nailed the abortion thing. Stuck with the Reagan exceptions while reassuring evangelicals he's on the side of protecting life. In reality it's killing a child. So she lost on that issue. His hammering of his success in getting the fedgov out of abortion after 52 years was skillful.
He has won two prior presidential elections with his same views on abortion, meaning women are supporting him who aren't all about wantonly fucking everything that moves and then killing any babies that result.
She did. She also did not answer if people were better off 4 years ago. That was one of the 1st questions. Her lack of response was likely enough for all the struggling Americans that MAY have been open minded to open their eyes and see She can't make life better for them.
Unfortunately it’s common, even with Trump, for politicians to not answer the specific question asked (trump was asked how he would remove the 11 or 21 million illegal immigrants and we got nothing). A candidate not answering only works if the opponent brings it up immediately. As soon as it was trumps turn he should have said, “you asked her if the economy is better off than 4 years ago; she ignored your question, because the answer is; it is not.”
He has a plan to deport ALL of them. Just like he has a healthcare plan that he didn’t need to explain. He played his cards close to the vest.
She has been stealing his policy ideas. When she said he turned down 1500 border agents he should have asked her why she stopped funding for the wall. Trump needs to point out that the first time around Kamala and her friends held the majority and blocked most of his plans. They WANTED open borders.
I'd like to hear about the deportation plan and esp. the "healthcare plan". What healthcare plan?
He touted that in 2016 also, and today we still got Foebamacare. Never heard one syllable about actually replacing it with something much much better.
In the case of his deportation plan, I can see where he wouldn't divulge too many details. Kinda like planning to go to war and laying your war plans out for the world to see - the healthcare issue - not so much. No reason we couldn't have details.
She didn't answer if she'd support abortions at 9,8, or even 7 months
Trump got cooked on abortion. I don't support abortion but the general voting women public does and he's getting crushed on it before, and tonight wasn't gonna help.
It's funny how different people can watch the same program and see two different things. I thought he nailed the abortion thing. Stuck with the Reagan exceptions while reassuring evangelicals he's on the side of protecting life. In reality it's killing a child. So she lost on that issue. His hammering of his success in getting the fedgov out of abortion after 52 years was skillful.
He has won two prior presidential elections with his same views on abortion, meaning women are supporting him who aren't all about wantonly fucking everything that moves and then killing any babies that result.