Thanks /u/I-am-Orlando
Sauce for both
https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1835340392436285554
https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1835346600559841465
He explains why redactions/delay here
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Go back to your liberal sites.
Follow blindly, sheep. Ask no questions and believe everything that you want to be true, without question. Lucky for you, other people will exercise their skepticism and require things to be substantiated so you don't have to. Dollars to donuts, you still watch Fox. Don't you?
Not that I need to answer but I quit Faux News after MeAgain Kelly did the debate.
I watch NO affiliate news.
I research.
Then you should forgive someone who wants sources a little beyond a screenshot if a document. At no point did I deny it's validity. I just require more information than a picture of an alleged document. I'm way past the fool me once part of the idiom. Taking things at face value, lest you forget, is how we found ourselves in this mess.
See comment below:
nothingberg 2 points 13 hours ago +2 / -0
It's a very real affidavit of a person who claims to be a witness to debate limitations that were discussed beforehand; and he made this affidavit before the debate even happened and sent them out to various parties before the debate happened.
It said that ABC was going to be able to fact check Trump, meaning they knew ahead of time which questions would be asked and would NOT be asked. Kamala made very specific restrictions on what could be asked and said they could not talk about her time as AG, about her bro in law; and about willie brown stuff I think.
The moderator admitted to going after Trump.
So there is that.
Precisely. More clues lend to more credibility. Very few things can and should be taken at face value. I really feel like I find myself making this case far too often in a place where everyone should demand every ounce of proof available.