Tucker Carlson was in Wisconsin a day or so ago in front of a live audience of thousands and interviewed two lifelong Democrats, who sound more like Republicans with conservative values than Lindsey Graham.
If you have any doubt that Trump had the military arrest G H W Bush and try him for treason, was found guilty and was then executed you should watch the below video starting around the 48-50-minute mark. RFK Jr does not say it out right but when you read between the lines, after Trump saw the JFK files and was begged by Pompeo to not release the truth to the public, Trump took action using his power over the military.
I'd implore you all to watch the entire live show but start at around the 48-50-minute mark to smell what I'm stepping in.
I watched from 48:00 to 58:00 and I heard RFK Jr say that according to Trump it was a personal plea from Mike Pompeo not to release anything.
He continues on to talk about the CIA and the U2 spyplane incident but I couldn't connect GHW Bush at all. Maybe if you could help with my line of thought then I could get there.
Same here. OP should maybe be more direct about how the connection is made to GHWB and the envelopes at the funeral because I saw nothing that even remotely makes any suggestion about them.
Are we just making the assumption that to protect the institution means GHWB and that since "all involved are dead" and GHWB is dead that it means he's referring to him and then are we to make another assumption leap to conclude the envelopes contained his confession?
This does not read as any sort of confirmation to me. Confirmation is saying it in plain english, naming names, leaving nothing up to assumptions. This instead looks like taking a vague statement and relating it an existing belief which is not confirmation.
That doesn't match the instant reactions. Makes no sense. Thank you for listening for us. This did sound a tad like click bate.
Former Presidents secretly arrested, secretly tried, secretly convicted, and secretly executed by the military at the order of a current President.
Consider this: What if it were Biden giving the order and it was Trump on the receiving end?
Does that sound like a Constitutionally valid action? Does that sound like a country you'd want to live in or give your life to defend? Does that sound like the actions of a patriotic Commander in Chief or a Military following lawful orders?
I never understood how these kind of Q interpretations got traction in the first place and if they were to be true it poses a terrifying scenario akin to 1984. If you said North Korea did this or China or Hillary Clinton I could believe it, but I'm supposed to believe that Trump would condone such things? Really?
You seem to have forgotten we're talking about treason and a global plot to destroy this country.
Yes, that sounds like a Constitutionally valid action.
When the political climate is as polarized as it is, and the country is on the verge of civil war, these types of things should probably be done in the open. The public needs to see all evidence for themselves, because Framus is right, they could do the exact same thing to Trump, and they could claim he's guilty of treason and a global plot to destroy the country, and they would tie it all to Russia or whomever they please. I'm sick of our government who is supposed to work for us doing things behind closed doors and in the dark while we the "peasants" are considered too dumb or too fragile to understand and are instead fed a constant diet of propaganda to keep us distracted.
I haven't forgotten but if everything is in secret how do you know who the baddies really are? Where is the proof of treason or is it someone's word against someone else?
Again, what if it's Biden giving the orders and Trump is on the receiving end? We may think it's one way or another but if everything is done in secret we would never know.
"Beware lest the State deem you a problem. You will be secretly disappeared and never heard from again". You would support that kind of Government?
...all threats foreign or domestic.
did you miss this?:
If the un-elected U.S. military can arrest and try a United States citizen we are in real trouble, don't you think?
Except for certain sheriffs and commissioners, police aren’t elected, either. The military can arrest people. And a president isn’t just a citizen. As commander-in-chief he’s a member of the military, too.
The civilian police are not a part of the military so why use them as an example? As for the M.P.s when is the last time you saw the Military Police pull some one over for speeding on a public roadway or arrest a civilian at a Walmart for shoplifting? I hope you see my point. The National Guard may be activated by a state during an emergency but they are still under the control of a civilian authority. They can detain in certain circumstances but not arrest (actually I see these as the same thing but that's for another time) because they are military.
Also, the U.S. President is 'just a citizen' and is NOT a part of the military. In the U.S. only a civilian can be Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.
because you complained about unelected people making arrests
your trolling is tiresome. Be gone
I'm trolling? LOL. You said "did you miss this?: the military arrest G H W Bush and try him for treason“
So I said: "If the un-elected U.S. military can arrest..." You had to know I was talking about the military, not civilian police because you brought up the military doing the arresting.
You started the dialogue between us here and it's not my fault you were mistaken. It happens and there's no need to be pissy about it.
Interesting, hope the Truth does come fully out!
The preamble of Tucker about your truth detectors was amazing. In fact, the whole thing was incredible. The Tucker tour is unlike anything I’ve ever seen.