I think Joe Rambo's stance is that both assassination attempts were staged by the white hats, i.e. fake blood and no bullets and crisis actors. At least that's what I remember.
But I can say for sure that it's nonsense because there were indeed bullets flying, and people got hurt and killed.
Similar to many people's view that the white hats are controlling things and making the dems destroy the country? That's the most nonsensical thing I've ever heard. My reply is always, if the white hats are in control of this nightmare then they are the ones responsible.
Well, not quite "making them do" but rather "letting them do" to do the whole Great Awakening thing.
Exposing them all for all to see.
But yes in principle I agree that they'd also be responsible for the damages that ensue.
Same problem I have with God to be honest. He can stop any bad things from happening any time but then why doesn't he? And if he doesn't and people are hurt or killed he's also responsible, no?
Communist revolutions, WW1, WW2, Cold War, 9/11, 2020 rigged election, human trafficking, hundreds of millions if not more perished.
Gengis Khan wiped out half of Europe and Asia under his rule, literally raped and pillaged along the way. Believers and non believers alike. Same with Communist China and Russia.
Surely, after millions of innocents dying and/or suffering is at least when he should step in right?
If you saw your son in the process of getting beat up by a violent gang and they're about to do some serious harm, and you have the power to neutralize said gang, and you decide "nah it's free will let them sort it out" would you not be responsible for the consequences of doing nothing when you could have done something about it?
That would be an (edit: white) pawn moving down the g file towards the (edit: black) pieces and I have no idea why someone would say that is “nearly always fatal.”
Edit: my bad, sick and tired as I wrote that^. Chessfag here not sure why g5 to g6 would be characterized as “nearly always fatal.” The chess generalizations are getting annoying to me
Same. I just racked my brain trying to make sense of g5-g6. I can't figure it no matter what stage of the game. Q at g6 with B at b5 is common if playing an unskilled player but this Rambo dude makes no sense here. He often doesn't anyway kek
4D thats too much power, shocking voltage, someone took the L. God help us all in Jesus name and maybe whoever the bichop sentenced to death be waving "bi den" from the other side.
So Trump had the assassin there while he was moving from G5 to G6. It was planned, by Trump? Not getting it? Either I'm dumb or it makes no sense.
You and me, both.
I think Joe Rambo's stance is that both assassination attempts were staged by the white hats, i.e. fake blood and no bullets and crisis actors. At least that's what I remember.
But I can say for sure that it's nonsense because there were indeed bullets flying, and people got hurt and killed.
Similar to many people's view that the white hats are controlling things and making the dems destroy the country? That's the most nonsensical thing I've ever heard. My reply is always, if the white hats are in control of this nightmare then they are the ones responsible.
Well, not quite "making them do" but rather "letting them do" to do the whole Great Awakening thing.
Exposing them all for all to see.
But yes in principle I agree that they'd also be responsible for the damages that ensue.
Same problem I have with God to be honest. He can stop any bad things from happening any time but then why doesn't he? And if he doesn't and people are hurt or killed he's also responsible, no?
Communist revolutions, WW1, WW2, Cold War, 9/11, 2020 rigged election, human trafficking, hundreds of millions if not more perished.
Gengis Khan wiped out half of Europe and Asia under his rule, literally raped and pillaged along the way. Believers and non believers alike. Same with Communist China and Russia.
Surely, after millions of innocents dying and/or suffering is at least when he should step in right?
What?! Why would God be responsible for what others do?
If you saw your son in the process of getting beat up by a violent gang and they're about to do some serious harm, and you have the power to neutralize said gang, and you decide "nah it's free will let them sort it out" would you not be responsible for the consequences of doing nothing when you could have done something about it?
"We are God's children and He will protect us"
Okay so when does he do so?
Oh god, and people listen to this guy, Joe Rambo?
Ehh he's hit and miss...
Like Ashlii Babbitt who was never killed?
What is G5 to G6 and why is it nearly always fatal
That would be an (edit: white) pawn moving down the g file towards the (edit: black) pieces and I have no idea why someone would say that is “nearly always fatal.”
Edit: my bad, sick and tired as I wrote that^. Chessfag here not sure why g5 to g6 would be characterized as “nearly always fatal.” The chess generalizations are getting annoying to me
I just googled that and this came up https://g6.ed.gov/
A new manner of writing for grants! Sick and tired of sick and tired!
Im a beginner but i think inter dimensionally and, it is possible that 7 hides 5 and 5 can hide in 6 but not entirely vice versa.
Same. I just racked my brain trying to make sense of g5-g6. I can't figure it no matter what stage of the game. Q at g6 with B at b5 is common if playing an unskilled player but this Rambo dude makes no sense here. He often doesn't anyway kek
https://nitter.poast.org/BrainStorm_Joe/status/1836385677048533311
4 Dementia-nal chess? Explains a lot about Potatus trajectory.
4D thats too much power, shocking voltage, someone took the L. God help us all in Jesus name and maybe whoever the bichop sentenced to death be waving "bi den" from the other side.