Nope. You get to prove that any of them are true. I've already pointed out several flaws in your reasoning. You may cite facts, but you do not draw legitimate conclusions. The main flaw in your outlook is collectivism.
OK, "six million": Are you claiming that every reference to six million Jews is entirely accurate even the ones that occurred before Hitler came to power?
If not then doesn't that cast doubt on the holocaust figure?
I do not have any hatred. You are quite wrong there.
Also, if you can find any of my supposed facts that are incorrect please point them out and tell me what they actually are so I can re-check them.
Nope. You get to prove that any of them are true. I've already pointed out several flaws in your reasoning. You may cite facts, but you do not draw legitimate conclusions. The main flaw in your outlook is collectivism.
OK, "six million": Are you claiming that every reference to six million Jews is entirely accurate even the ones that occurred before Hitler came to power?
If not then doesn't that cast doubt on the holocaust figure?
More complete list.
This leads to other questions like:
Just arguing the holocaust number is correct without explaining the others is just an act of faith that follows no logic.
You are quibbling over millions? You are sick, when the number is possibly much larger.
So, do you believe all the extant six million figures or not?
If you do, isn't is an unbelievable coincidence that it is always exactly the same number?
If not then how do you know which ones are right and which ones are wrong?
Your position is to believe something incredible without any clear evidence.