Do you remember when Q made numerous Biblical references and specifically mentioned to follow the bloodlines? The reason these are "Biblical Times" is because we are in the midst of an irregular, spiritual, psychological, information based, bloodline war where God wins in the end. The bloodlines engaged in this warfare are the interbred and intermarried fake Jewish Khazarian Mafia (Illuminati/Jesuit) bloodlines whom seek to exterminate the remaining Druze ethnic bloodlines (800,000 to 2,000,000 people) from Earth as they share the same scientifically proven DNA as Jesus Christ.
Speaking of Biblical times, this brings our attention to the intentionally lost book of Q (the Gospel of Q) which are the direct teachings of Jesus Christ believed to be one of the original gospels. The book Q consists of 6236 verses (6 + 2 + 3 + 6) = 17. This is very similar to the intentional exclusion of the Book of Enoch or the Gospel of Mary Magdalene from the Bible and the removal and reinstallation of the book of Revelation. The reason the Q gospel and many other books with hidden teachings were intentionally removed from the Bible is due to the constant Freemasonic Illuminati Jesuit (Vatican) editing, mistranslating, and restructuring of the Bible. This is to hide specific spiritual teachings relating to ascension, karmic debt, natural cures/remedies, reincarnation, the third eye (pineal gland), vibrational frequency, etc. where the Bible was censored from 777 (angel number) original books all the way down to 66 books (their favorite Luciferian number of course). Many people hid these sacred spiritual books to preserve for future generations since they were forbidden from the modern 1611 Edition King James Freemason Bible.
Go onto Duck Duck Go, and enter the pieces I stated. You’ll get plenty of articles to dive into Anon about the editing and books removed from the original Bible and the many many arguments of why. Though it was really to control the religious narrative of Creation, the Angels, and being Saved. Look up the Ge’ez Bible, the oldest complete Bible known. And read why it has 22 or 26 more books than the King James and it’s 800 years older. Including the Books of Enoch. You should probably dive into Billy Carson’s info on the Sumerian Tablets if you get this far. Because you’ll begin to realize the “Creation Story” is also larger than what they taught you in Sunday School.
I don't see anything about the first or second councils of Nicea editing the canon of scripture. That's why I'm asking you.
Really?! I just wiki’d it. Come on. 2nd Council of Nicaea. AD 787. The 1st Council was before that. Effort Anon, effort. 😉 Plenty of scholarly articles besides Wikipedia on both Councils.
I'm asking for a source on what alterations took place during the councils. As far as I can see, the first council had to do with Arianism and the second council had to do with Icons. I don't see anything at all regarding the canon of scripture in either of those councils.
Maybe you misspoke?
https://ps.edu/council-nicaea-biblical-canon/
https://textandcanon.org/the-council-of-nicea-and-the-biblical-canon/
If you can, please go to the documents of either council and show where either of them discussed the cannon of Scripture.
Maybe you meant the Council of Hippo? Are you sure you understand why they don't include the Book of Enoch?
The 1st & 2nd Council of Nicaea was very responsible for the books removed from the Bible becoming the Apocryphal books. They also heavily edited the Bible from scriptures possibly and most likely due to linguistic translations from Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Ge’ez, and even the mirrored stories out of the Sumerian Tablets. Billy Carson if 4Bidden Knowledge has an entire research book series and YouTube video series on these. The Dead Sea Scrolls also confirm the 2 most popular versions of the Bible (KJV and NIV), do not have all of the original books and in their original 100% written meanings And again this is due to linguistics and the agenda of man. Not because God or Christ intended these people to change the meanings of words or even remove entire books all for narrative control. Below is also a great video on linguistic changes and how the current/modern Bibles in certain places, especially around creation do not mean exactly what was originally written. Especially the idea of God being of 1. Turns out the original word Elohim is plural, not mono. Which in turn creates an entire different original narrative on God vs Gods. Is it what we choose, yes. But the context in current Bibles is per research, no longer modernly correct since we now have translated access to more complete and older, non-Vatican-controlled scriptural information.
It just may appear due to the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ge’ez Bible, that the Sumerians have been partially right/correct all along about some of the story of Human Creation. And this was all purposely hidden by the Roman Church/Vatican the last 1800+ years, so they alone could control the Christian religious narrative.
https://youtu.be/Qo7e2Rh6WpM?si=HjYZ_fbCQ26NisjA