Regarding John Kerry's statements: The scary part of this is that he really believes what he is saying.
Rough translation: "I want to protect the power structure we always had over public opinion... and we cannot implement our agenda (illegally) without it."
"To the people who are suggesting that there are voices who should be ignored because they're encouraging mistrust or skepticism of authority, or obstructing consensus: I'm not encouraging you to be skeptical of authority. I'm encouraging you to DEFY authority. That is the right word for this time.
To all those Snoops and Nosey Parkers sitting in their Homeland Security-funded “Centers of Excellence,” telling us day after day we must think as they say and vote as they say or else we’re traitorous Putin-loving fascists and enablers of “dangerous” disinformation:
Motherfucker, I’m an American. That shit does not work on me. And how can you impugn my patriotism, when you’re sitting in Klaus Schwab’s lap, apologizing for the First Amendment to a crowd of Europeans? Look in the mirror.
I’m not the problem. We’re not the problem.
You’re the problem.
YOU SUCK."
This last bit says it all. Motherfucker, I'm an American. That shit does not work on me.
[..]problem around building consensus surrounding any issue, it is really hard to govern today[..] the kind of referee we used to have is kind of eviscerated, and people self select where they go for their news and their information,and then you just get into a vicious cycle. [..] there is now a lot of discussion on how to curb these entities so you can have some consensus on facts. If people go to one source, and that source is sick and an agenda, and they are putting out this information our first amendment stand as a major block to be able to just hammer it out of existence. So, what we need is to win the ground, win the right to govern. Hopefully, winning enough votes you'be be able to implement change.
Chilling comment, indeed.
First, Kerry is in violation of his allegiance.
Second, even IF there was no first amendment, there real issue is with: people self select. That is their issue. Because, the one source being sick and having an agenda, goes for them as well.
Third, consensus politics yields the same result as consensus science. Bullshit, and it is not even science or politics.
Fourth, here you see the real agenda: the right to govern for its own sake, without the rooting of it in a well established moral soil.
Fifth, a government that no longer is rooting in the moral senses of the population, withers away, and probably will be violently overthrown.
His comment is the perfect example of the nihilist agenda of the WEF.
That this buffoon thinks the legacy media was some sort of "referee" is truly indiciative of their arrogance and I have nothing but contempt for these people. MSM has always been the propaganda arm of the demonrats. Now they're just throwing a tantrum because the playing field has been leveled.
Regarding John Kerry's statements: The scary part of this is that he really believes what he is saying.
Rough translation: "I want to protect the power structure we always had over public opinion... and we cannot implement our agenda (illegally) without it."
Our translation: "You are losing pal!"
You read it wrong. Like, absolutely the opposite and totally wrong.
He said it's a translation. And the translation seems to be correct to me
"To the people who are suggesting that there are voices who should be ignored because they're encouraging mistrust or skepticism of authority, or obstructing consensus: I'm not encouraging you to be skeptical of authority. I'm encouraging you to DEFY authority. That is the right word for this time.
To all those Snoops and Nosey Parkers sitting in their Homeland Security-funded “Centers of Excellence,” telling us day after day we must think as they say and vote as they say or else we’re traitorous Putin-loving fascists and enablers of “dangerous” disinformation:
Motherfucker, I’m an American. That shit does not work on me. And how can you impugn my patriotism, when you’re sitting in Klaus Schwab’s lap, apologizing for the First Amendment to a crowd of Europeans? Look in the mirror.
I’m not the problem. We’re not the problem.
You’re the problem.
YOU SUCK."
This last bit says it all. Motherfucker, I'm an American. That shit does not work on me.
1A = Freedom, 2A Guarantees It! WWG1WGA!
Kerry:
Chilling comment, indeed.
First, Kerry is in violation of his allegiance. Second, even IF there was no first amendment, there real issue is with: people self select. That is their issue. Because, the one source being sick and having an agenda, goes for them as well. Third, consensus politics yields the same result as consensus science. Bullshit, and it is not even science or politics. Fourth, here you see the real agenda: the right to govern for its own sake, without the rooting of it in a well established moral soil. Fifth, a government that no longer is rooting in the moral senses of the population, withers away, and probably will be violently overthrown.
His comment is the perfect example of the nihilist agenda of the WEF.
That this buffoon thinks the legacy media was some sort of "referee" is truly indiciative of their arrogance and I have nothing but contempt for these people. MSM has always been the propaganda arm of the demonrats. Now they're just throwing a tantrum because the playing field has been leveled.
Excellent speech. May I also recommend On Liberty by John Stewart mills?