Does the Vatican Own BlackRock? Amazing Deep Dig
(forbiddennews.substack.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
Something to ponder: Think back to when Christ was crucified. Who was responsible? Jews and Romans.
The Romans had the power, and the Jews raised such a ruckus that the Romans finally said ok bring him in, we will kill him for you.
What ended up happening next? The Romans went on a rampage, killing Jews and Christians both. The Christians who understood Christ's warnings in Matt. 24, fled, while the Jews were massacred along with the 2nd temple. Anyways, fast forward to the 300s, and now Rome adopts a bastardized form of Christianity for political reasons, to save their crumbling empire. They then proceed to dominate the faith and dictate it to the world, on pain of death. THEY make the doctrines and rituals. "Officially state-sanctioned religion". Marriage of church and state. They kill countless Christians and Jews in the process. This time, though, they're operating on their own. They have merged the spiritual and carnal powers into a superstate. They no longer need any Jews to tell them who to kill, they're quite capable of determining these matters for themselves! I ask, is it so hard to believe that this institution, which has lasted longer than any other institutuon on earth, isn't doing the same things today, allbeit in back-handed and subtle ways? Do you really think they would allow some pesky Jews to control them? A quick study into Papal Court Jews will show you that the opposite is true. They hired the Rothschilds to manage their money. Remind me again what the order of authority is for someone who is hired by someone else...
u/#MindBlown
I keep wondering if Trump is on one of those two sides, or on a third side we don’t know about yet, or something else.
It’s so discomforting, yet necessary, to not know that. Prayer up!
Big time. There's a claim in this article about the scriptures being written by the cabal in the 1600s, which I dispute because.
They are antithetical to the cabal
There is ample history going back through time of their existance
The holy Spirit within me says to
and there's another reason which I'm being told not to share. BUT even if this astronomical claim is true, it wouldn't change anybody's relationship to Christ. Paul's statements in Galatians 1:8-9 resonate on this. There's something even beyond the scriptures themselves and that's God Himself and His Son Jesus
edit- even AI knows that claim is false https://files.catbox.moe/inthmz.jpeg
Amen. I kept thinking about this Matthew verse 15:11 = What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.”
It makes me ponder the whole point of Christianity is for people to develop a rship with Jesus Christ, God, and I think that verse speaks what Jesus sees in us is our hearts, not buildings, and things made up/added by men. It is our heart He seeks, and that verse when we die some may not enter and Jesus would say "I do not know you".. I think because what He sees is our hearts.
So yeah, what you said =There's something even beyond the scriptures themselves and that's God Himself and His Son Jesus
I really like your theory.. totally makes sense. Please do share more if you think of anything else.. We really need to go all the way back in history to see these ruthless people never changed their nature, just their uniforms. All made perfect sense to me!! Thanks, Fren
I also remember Hillary sitting with the Cardinal in NY dinner where she and Trump roasted each other. What was it called again? And that Catholic cardinal/priest sat there with Hillary laughing.. uhm..he's sitting with a baby killer pro abortion person like they're old pals. and Hillary belongs to some secret sisterhood club.. tying back to the Freemasons, the Catholics.. all makes sense now. Their money laundering tunnels right infront of our eyes
“and now Rome adopts a bastardized form of Christianity for political reasons,“
Hope you aren’t talking about Catholicism. It’s literally the reason why you have a Bible. if you are indeed talking about the Catholic faith, I hope you’re ready to accept that your Bible cannot be trusted as the Catholic Church put the Bible together.
Ugh, this old tired arguement again.
https://www.bible.ca/cath-bible-origin.htm
https://carm.org/roman-catholicism/did-the-roman-catholic-church-give-us-our-bible/
https://www.chick.com/battle-cry/article?id=did-the-catholic-church-really-give-us-the-bible
King James, the Freemason?
Freemasons or the foot soldiers for the New World order and are helping Jews build the third temple where the antichrist will sit and declare himself God. From the the world court established in Jerusalem, the Noahhide laws will be enacted- the laws that will behead Catholics and Christians for “idolatry”.
You have a long way to go.
the Bible as a whole was not officially compiled until the late fourth century, illustrating that it was the Catholic Church who determined the canon—or list of books—of the Bible under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Indeed, the Bible is not a not a self-canonizing collection of books, as there is no table of contents included in any of the books.
Although the New Testament canon was not determined until the late 300s, books the Church deemed sacred were early on proclaimed at Mass, and read and preached about otherwise. Early Christian writings outnumbered the 27 books that would become the canon of the New Testament. The shepherds of the Church, by a process of spiritual discernment and investigation into the liturgical traditions of the Church spread throughout the world, had to draw clear lines of distinction between books that are truly inspired by God and originated in the apostolic period, and those which only claimed to have these qualities.
The process culminated in 382 as the Council of Rome, which was convened under the leadership of Pope Damasus, promulgated the 73-book scriptural canon. The biblical canon was reaffirmed by the regional councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397), and then definitively reaffirmed by the ecumenical Council of Florence in 1442.
Finally, the ecumenical Council of Trent solemnly defined this same canon in 1546, after it came under attack by the first Protestant leaders, including Martin Luther.
Did you read the links I posted on the subject?
edit- a fairly recent revelation has caused me to abandon the Protestant denoms also, and I can't speak to KJ much but regardless of Freemasonry or not, he was a critical figure in spreading the scriptures into the hands of the people, while the RCC was a primary agent of keeping them from them.
edit2 - furthermore thanks to a video someone posted here today I learned that Muslims have what they call an Imam, who is their "spiritual father". This is quite similar to how the Christian sects do things. I just found that very notable. I am, at this point, convinced that organized religion, in the way we have it at least, is utterly satanic. By the grace of Almighty God we still get spiritual guidance and spiritual food from it but man. The absolute state 💀