You have no fucking clue what you are talking about. None. I tried to be nice, but you opted to go full retard. Likely you are cerebrally impaired, and pretend to be something you are not. I suggest a helmet when you venture out (I assume you fall down a lot).
Sadly, your parents clearly failed you. Your lack of education and inability to comprehend is astounding, which makes your claims laughable. You wouldn't know the scientific method if it kicked you in your vagina.
I will not agree to disagree because you haven't presented anything to actually disagree with, other than your capacity for logical reasoning. On that we agree, you have none.
In epidemiological studies, using the 'general population' as a baseline has always been extremely useful, and this is especially true in studies looking at incidence rates of diseases or conditions where a large, generalized control group provides a normative baseline.
The background population must match the study group in relevant demographics and characteristics as closely as possible, except for the variable being studied. This ensures that any differences observed can be attributed solely to the variable in question rather than confounding factors. (In this case, kid/vaxx.)
Nice cut and paste. You cant garner a % using the "general population", seeing as proportionality requires denomination. You cant say the "gen pop" is the denominator, considering you have no idea what that number is. Its fucking dumb. Shocker, I know. Additionally, no one has a clue what the true % of injectees is. No one. So, nice try but, no. It doesnt work. Go back to study hall.
You have no fucking clue what you are talking about. None. I tried to be nice, but you opted to go full retard. Likely you are cerebrally impaired, and pretend to be something you are not. I suggest a helmet when you venture out (I assume you fall down a lot).
Sadly, your parents clearly failed you. Your lack of education and inability to comprehend is astounding, which makes your claims laughable. You wouldn't know the scientific method if it kicked you in your vagina.
I will not agree to disagree because you haven't presented anything to actually disagree with, other than your capacity for logical reasoning. On that we agree, you have none.
Ok, in crayon...
In epidemiological studies, using the 'general population' as a baseline has always been extremely useful, and this is especially true in studies looking at incidence rates of diseases or conditions where a large, generalized control group provides a normative baseline.
The background population must match the study group in relevant demographics and characteristics as closely as possible, except for the variable being studied. This ensures that any differences observed can be attributed solely to the variable in question rather than confounding factors. (In this case, kid/vaxx.)
Nice cut and paste. You cant garner a % using the "general population", seeing as proportionality requires denomination. You cant say the "gen pop" is the denominator, considering you have no idea what that number is. Its fucking dumb. Shocker, I know. Additionally, no one has a clue what the true % of injectees is. No one. So, nice try but, no. It doesnt work. Go back to study hall.
Good grief. When the numerator is ZERO, it makes no difference what the denominator is.
Lol. Ur done
I'm glad you got that off your chest. The folks in the control group would be proud.