184
posted ago by PowderRoomPolitics ago by PowderRoomPolitics +184 / -0

Archive this Georgia Straight link before it's gone: https://www.straight.com/article-338645/vancouver/us-haarp-program-can-alter-weather-and-disrupt-communications

HAARP was funded in 1993 by DARPA, the Air Force, the Navy, and University of Alaska Fairbanks. The work was done by APTI, part of Arco. Today it has 360 transmitters and is still operated by UAF on anyone's behalf on a pay-to-play basis.

Nick Begich and Jeane Manning met in 1994 and had both accumulated huge swaths of documentation of HAARP dangers. With help of whistleblower activist Clare Zickuhr (formerly an Arco accountant), they published Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology in 1995 and released a video version in 1996. They already knew of the Vietnam rain tests, Skyfire, and Stormfury, but found HAARP the worst of all the weather mods.

And we've been warning people about the HAARP in the heavens for about 25 years ourselves.

That is, ever since their data was further mainstreamed by prophet Hal Lindsey in Apocalypse Code in 1997 ("A HAARP from Hell"), who compares it to Russian ionospheric plasma research.

The Russian research appears to have created warmer Soviet winters at the expense of creating the Miami snow of 1977 (the only time in history). But it was abruptly destroyed by an overload leading to an explosion in 1981 in its home city of Gomel. However, we know Soviet local research continued there because it took another bigger explosion to stop it, in the slightly more famous nearby city of Chernobyl (Wormwood). Sabotage anyone?

In 2004-2005, seven major hurricanes hit Florida in about 16 months, including Katrina, possibly the worst ever. In 2005 they ran out of hurricane names and had to start using Greek letters: the year of the 27 named storms. For the next ten years, zero major hurricanes hit Florida. We watched it in realtime. In 2016, an election year, five hurricanes affected Florida, including Matthew. In 2020, an election year, there were 30 named storms! In 2024, an election year, there have been three hurricanes in Florida so far: Debby, Helene, Milton. Helene's northern flooding is unprecedented, and Milton (though it died down, thanks to prayer) still produced dozens of east-coast tornadoes with unprecedented damage from that overlooked threat. How many coincidences?

We figured out this connection during Wilma 2005, actually. The Weather Channel was so proud of how the airmen worked so hard to drop dry ice to "weaken" the storm. So naturally hubby and I asked each other, if they know how to weaken the storm don't they know how to strengthen storms too? Obviously! Since then we haven't trusted a thing the government says about this. Shortly after that, the news proudly said the government admits performing "geoengineering": and we nodded, see, they are claiming responsibility for it all, backhandedly as ever. Gotta admit, however, the anons tying this into the MSM climate change bilgewater is brilliant timing and savoir faire!

How far back does it go? Well, TIL that the technology was patented (4,686,605) on August 11, 1987, as "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region of the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere", by Bernard Eastlund (MIT) when employed by Arco: he calls it an "ionosphere heater". However, Eastlund seems to take the John Galt role in this history, because his three patents (one classified) were only issued to Arco right after H-Bomb inventor Edward Teller, on behalf of Star Wars (SDI), came to inspect the experiments and Eastlund was "sort of ushered out" (his words) about two weeks later. Eastlund admits that he remains the inventor yet Arco had full rights to build: and his warnings, published in Omni in March 1988 (which also tied it emphatically to Tesla, we'll need to dig out that issue), went unheeded until HAARP was actually built. [Apparently Tesla would've built it himself if J.P. Morgan had not bailed on funding him!] With HAARP operational, that's when Zickuhr noticed the Arco milspec for DARPA was identical to the Eastlund patents and connected the dots.

The entire "ozone hole" myth was just a cover story to deflect from the fact that the government has been frying holes in the ionosphere willy-nilly. Eastlund said he discovered how to lift the ionosphere and move it and manipulate it, by accelerating its electrons: he recognized this could do things like rerouting the jet stream. The levels reached in 2007 by the 180-antenna array were tremendous, many times "1.21 gigawatts"; they are not specifically deleterious to any small area but one concern is that their reflections overall are known to create generic DNA stresses, leading to reproductive defects.

Another problem is that it affects migratory senses in animals: that explains all the flocks falling out of the sky at the same time, doesn't it? It even explains the mystery untraceable hums that are heard occasionally at various locations. Popular Science tried to claim the power is "minuscule compared with the power of a lightning flash", but now that we're up to claims of 100 gigawatts and we have the helpful lightning comparison figure from Doc Brown, we know that's no longer true of the current HAARP strength.

The government attempted to get ahead of the story by conducting a Joint Electromagnetic Inferference study for 3 years, right after Arco bought up the patents. This is also deceptively called Hazard of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance (HERO). There was an official presentation by Charles Quisenberry to MILCOM (September 30 and October 1, 1990) called "Joint Electromagnetic Interference (JEMI) Joint Test Force (JTF)", and blessings on you if you find it. (Remember what "Milcom" means in the Bible? Same as Moloch.) Quisenberry is cited by a Rand study by G. Parnell et al. in March 1991.

Quisenberry is notable for going on record later as to the actual dangers to aircraft. The Straight attributes a quote to JEMI, but it appears to be Quisenberry's summary to a small outlet called the Los Angeles Reader that reported, "Quisenberry says preliminary JEMI findings are that combinations of US weapons transmitting radio waves at certain frequencies can bring down an aircraft by putting it into an uncommanded turn or dive or by turning off its fuel supply."

Quisenberry blamed radio transmission technology for the "Black Hawk down" phenomenon and then later for the 1996 TWA 800 crash. The latter is behind a paywall at The New York Review of Books (pull quote: "Colonel Quisenberry reported that electromagnetic interference was a possible cause of the F111s' problems").

It appears that Arco's early experimentation somehow led to "a series of crashes linked to electrical interference" (Straight) summarized in the missing Quisenberry report and the Parnell sanitization, and Quisenberry semi-officially admitted this danger, which Alaskan pilots believed was due to the Fairbanks HAARP research. But this 1990 warning by Quisenberry also went unheeded and the research plowed ahead. The Alaska legislature (also the European parliament) investigated but had no official adverse conclusions.

Folks, HAARP is our equivalent of CERN except that it tinkers with us rather than with contained atom-splitting.

If we don't solve this ourselves by fighting for exposure and accountability for the ongoing UAF ionosphere experiments, only Jesus can sort out the radioactive damage involved!

The Straight reports, in part:

Manning later learned that the U.S. air force—at the Wright-Patterson air base in Dayton, Ohio—was pursuing Tesla technology for military applications. But it was an article on Tesla in the March 1988 issue of Omni magazine that tipped her off about the construction of a Tesla-inspired transmitter in Alaska. From a site located about halfway between Anchorage and Fairbanks, at a place called Gakona, a series of experiments dubbed the High Altitude Auroral Research Project was designed to beam millions of watts of energy into Earth’s highly charged ionosphere. HAARP’s inventor, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist named Bernard Eastlund, was excited about the possibilities. “You can virtually lift part of the atmosphere,” Eastlund told Omni. “You can make it move, do things to it.”

Manning didn’t like the sound of this. Neither did Omni. “Because the upper atmosphere is extremely sensitive to small changes in its composition,” the magazine warned, “merely testing an Eastlund device could cause irreversible damage.” A month later, an article in Physics and Society by Richard Williams increased her concern. Williams, a Harvard-trained physicist working at Princeton University, dubbed the experiments “irresponsible acts of global vandalism”. In his article, Williams warned that HAARP “might become a serious threat to the Earth’s atmosphere. With experiments on this scale, irreparable damage could be done in a short time.” Williams was particularly worried that using HAARP to alter the temperature of the ionosphere could interfere with the chemical reactions that produce the ozone protecting Earth from ultraviolet radiation.

Manning was interested in free energy, not death rays, but as a reporter for the Kelowna Daily News, she decided to check it out. A source she refused to divulge sent her a stack of documentation including two Eastlund patents for HAARP (a third patent was deemed classified). Manning next called Clare Zickuhr in Alaska. The former Atlantic Richfield Company accountant had blown the whistle on his company’s project, then formed No HAARP, an ad hoc group opposed to the project under development by the energy giant and the U.S. military. Zickuhr sent Manning military specifications relating to HAARP. “The wording was so similar to the Eastlund patents,” she said, “my intuition said ”˜This is bad news.’ ”

Manning’s secret source continued to feed her official documentation—and urged her to pursue the HAARP story. “I didn’t feel it was my job to do that,” Manning recalled. “I specialized in free energy.” She did, however, talk with a reporter from the Anchorage Daily News who was frustrated because his editor wouldn’t even look at a story that questioned the activities of ARCO, one of the state’s big employers. Manning asked her own managing editor to contact one of the Thomson newspaper chain’s “big guns” in Ottawa about looking into ARCO’s activities, but nothing came of her request.

In 1994, HAARP earned the top slot on the U.S. Project Censored’s list of the 10 most underreported news stories of the year. By then, Manning had moved to Vancouver, co-authored two books on new energy—The Granite Man and the Butterfly and Suppressed Inventions—and collected a mountainous stack of HAARP documents. The latest addition was an article by an Alaskan researcher and medical doctor in the Fall 1994 issue of Nexus magazine. Nick Begich claimed that the project could generate magnetic fields strong enough to lead salmon and caribou astray, disturb the weather, and disrupt communications over much of the planet. Other HAARP hazards, Begich warned, could be even more dire.

As an MD and independent researcher specializing in electro-medicine, Begich knew that weak electric currents can help regenerate bones and effect other cures, but he was also worried about the harmful effects of high-energy electromagnetic fields emitted by power lines, radars, and other devices. His article warned that HAARP could soon be subjecting his fellow Alaskans, Yukoners, and their northern British Columbian neighbours to unpredictable effects from the highest levels of electromagnetic radiation ever transmitted on Earth.

Manning called Begich to thank him for writing the Nexus article, and he asked her to keep in touch. When Begich came through Seattle in September 1994, Manning met him at SeaTac airport. Each of them was carrying a stack of documents. Back issues of Geophysical Quarterly, technical memoranda, HAARP-related patents, conference proceedings, interview transcripts, and correspondence would soon grow to a stack more than a metre high. “It might as well be a book,” Manning recalled telling Begich. “Would you like to collaborate?”

In early 1995, Begich took time off work and they spread their HAARP-related files across six metres of carpet in his Anchorage study. The resulting book has become a dog-eared bible for the anti-HAARP movement, a definitive text that unveils a project almost as secretive and potentially risky as the first atomic bomb. With almost 25,000 copies sold of two printings since its 1995 release, Angels Don’t Play This HAARP has sold from Germany to the Kootenays, is being translated into Greek, and is due for release in Japan in August—and it’s the biggest-selling Alaska-published book in that state’s history.

Commercial radio stations commonly broadcast in all directions at 50,000 watts; no one can predict exactly what will happen as scheduled HAARP tests begin radiating two, four, or 10 billion watts of power. But previous electromagnetic experiments in the ionosphere have been accompanied by a displaced jet stream and erratic weather often enough for some people to rule out coincidence. Some critics caution that HAARP’s powerfully focused beam could burn a hole in Earth’s electromagnetic shielding. As every Trekkie knows, if that force field ruptures, solar radiation will come pouring into Spaceship Earth, zapping all life-forms pinned in its roving glare.

Manning didn’t think this risk was worth taking just so “the big boys could play with their big toys”. Without the ionosphere’s electrical shielding, her research told her, our sun would fry us with gamma radiation, X rays, and shorter wavelengths of ultraviolet light. “We think that the holes in the ozone layer letting in some UV rays is bad,” Manning told the Straight. “Wait’ll we’ve got cosmic rays coming through at killing wavelengths.”