I just found another site that has Marg married to a Robert Stewart. His father was Sir John. But there's still no indication Marg had a Stewart child I can find.
This isn’t a surprise. Most people alive today are probably descended from many important historical figures. This is especially true for historical figures that are known to have many children, or whose children were known to have many children. Go back ten generations (about 250 years) and everyone has at most 1024 ancestors. Ten more generations and it’s over a million. A thousand years, a trillion ancestors, but at this point there’s definitely huge amounts of repeating. With the exception of bloodlines known to have died off, and isolated groups who stayed strictly separate from others for hundreds of years, most people alive today are likely descended from everyone who was alive on their continent of origin that long ago, and possibly even more depending on the extent of communication and relations with other groups.
and Isabella Margaret was not married to Sir John Stewart, but married Walter Stewart, who died within a year of the marriage - without having any children.
*rolls eyes
Have you broke out in hives yet?
The eye roll must be a cry for an epi-pen. 😂
So Trump is one sixteen-trillionth part Muhammad? That's two thousand times less share in Muhammad than one person's share in the whole earth.
about 10 minutes of research... deboonked (edit: maybe not).
Isabella Margaret married Walter Stewart, who died within a year of the marriage - without having any children.
Isabella had 3 children with her first husband who was Sir William Fenton.
EDIT: GENi has her married to Robert Stewart and that they had a child names John... so much for the interwebs.
and none were named John Stewart?
I just found another site that has Marg married to a Robert Stewart. His father was Sir John. But there's still no indication Marg had a Stewart child I can find.
You mean Rod Stewart. Wake up, Maggie.
:D
I'd believe Epstein is more likely to be his descendant
Lol would be utterly hilarious if true.
this is where i'm at
Well, I quit reading at Joan of Acre. Keke She never had children!
Joan of Acre is not Joan of Arc...
Joan of Acre had 8 kids.
this list is still probably a pile of bullshit.
Wonder how many kids Joan of Hector had? Keke
don't quit your day job... :D
lmao
Desperation.
This isn’t a surprise. Most people alive today are probably descended from many important historical figures. This is especially true for historical figures that are known to have many children, or whose children were known to have many children. Go back ten generations (about 250 years) and everyone has at most 1024 ancestors. Ten more generations and it’s over a million. A thousand years, a trillion ancestors, but at this point there’s definitely huge amounts of repeating. With the exception of bloodlines known to have died off, and isolated groups who stayed strictly separate from others for hundreds of years, most people alive today are likely descended from everyone who was alive on their continent of origin that long ago, and possibly even more depending on the extent of communication and relations with other groups.
Looks fake and gay.
I see Stuarts in the line. That is a family name in the 300 if I am not mistaken.
Stewart... not Stuart.
and Isabella Margaret was not married to Sir John Stewart, but married Walter Stewart, who died within a year of the marriage - without having any children.
Discord, seems about right.
I wouldn't care either way but it's dumb
No one cares…
Couldn't we all be traced back to someone?