I don't know why folks attach themselves to much to sauceless stuff. I don't think the intention of the Q operation was to turn millions into hopium addicts where facts, data, reasoning and critical thinking are put on the back seat to "things that make me feel good".
Maybe this, maybe that, maybe, maybe, maybe. The whole 'secret information/massive news!/non-evidence-based narratives' thing seems to have taken on a life of its own and simply become alt media replacement for the tabloid industry.
BTW, a bit of digging on this turns up our favorite "super inside information I'm with Space Force" Jan Halper interview from last month that say when SHE talked with Brunson in July, "he was under an NDA".
So she says. Trust me, sis? Maybe so he said? Trust me bro.
In the absence of concrete evidence, I'll wait to I set off the fireworks...
See also "Loy Brunson joins..... Charlie Ward".
Er, no thanks.
Wild prediction: we are going to see a LOT of this pseudo-conspiracy theory guff just wash out the door as DJT actually cleans up the govt, restores America and executes the plan concretely over the next 4 years. They have run rabid for 4+ years, particularly since Q stopped posting, surviving off the movement inspired by Q. I predict they are going to run out of fuel soon as the real work and real purpose of the Q movement unfolds.
Can’t wait for that. My sister and her husband says Q is practically not real. All is a psyop operation. Yes they voted President Trump but still saying I am crazy. Say that all Q says is not happening.
Well, perhaps they are not half wrong. History will tell. it is very clear that Q was a psyop. But it was a powerful, truth motivated psyop, to wake up millions and trigger a change in awareness in the wider population.
I think it is possible that many of the things that some people expect as a result of Q might not happen in the way they expect.
I would say that Q is about waking up. Learning about the reality of the world we live in, and learning to realize that we've been programmed and learning to unprogram ourselves. That also means, not adhering to our own interpretation of Q. Also, to distinguish between Q and anons. Adrenochrome? That's not Q. That's anon. (there may well be verious levels of truth to different aspects of the anon theories around adrenochrome, but will we ever know? I don't know.
The reports of police officer reactions to the Weiner laptop are the most intense. But whether this level of underbelly will be fully exposed, I do not know.
So I think it is OK to termper one's interpretations and expectations around Q, and to adopt a stance of rational reasonableness. There are somethings about Q we can be certain of: it's tremendous impact on awakening, and the triggering of exposure of many things we never really knew about. If you emphasize this aspect, perhaps you sister and husband can recognize that Q is real.
In other words, make a mental distinction between:
Things we know for sure about Q: it's impact, the proofs, the benefits of the approaches Q encouraged
Things we do not know for sure about Q: how much was disinformation, how much was actual information, what the full purpose of the Q operation was, how it will all play out, etc.
Being clear and frank about what we do know and what we do not know, by drawing a distinction between what we know, what we believe and conjecture, we are not being disloyal to Q. Quite the opposite. That's being very Q ish.
The corrupt cabal utilized massive psyops and media-based brainwashing for many decades to lead populations into a state of trance and delusion, while robbing and murdering us all the while, but the Q operation was a psyop to snap us out of this trance, liberate our capacity to think properly, freely, for ourselves, while inspiring us to dig and find the truth about things.
For me, this is the essence of Q, and all the other stuff is simply part of the methodology. From Big Mike to Face Masks, to Gunatanamo trials, to JFK jr, etc, there is a LOT of stuff in the Awakening sphere that did NOT directly come from Q. To me, all that stuff is expendable. I can believe or not believe, without any major impact on the benefits of the Q operation. (personally, I think that actually a lot of the belief aspects are detrimental because they go against the kind of mental freedom that Q was attempting to instil. But that's me....)
That is meaningful to some people, but not to others. Myself, a very strong believer in the Q operation, treat such 'proofs' as the checkmate 57-43 thing will little importance. Some are absolutely convinced that its what they think it is. I adopt a arms length skepticism, precisely because I have a LOT of experience with beliefs, emotions and how they can impact on freedom of thought.
To me, such proofs are the least important aspects of the Q operation, and by and large, negligible. During the operation itself, they had a very important function: to expose and reinforce the validity of Q itself as an operation. After 2021, I think with close to 5000 Q drops, 365 days in a year, 24 hours in a day, you are definitely going to get crossover and coincidences.
I don't think they are helpful. Why? Because they are unnecessary to validate Q. And, we do NOT have Q around to correct or check any mistaken takes.
Learn from the Q operation in the period of Q. That should be enough to go on. Some things might role out that show an amazing connection between drops and current events, but without Q directing us, we have to apply 5X the discernment, critical thinking, reasoning, evidence, and even skepticism. Otherwise, it is far too easy to fall in to a pseudo-religious stance that reinforces one's conclusions and beliefs by their own power.
If logic were to prevail, we would call this Q an coup de ta, and they are overthrowing the government... logic is out the window when it comes to this stuff. Technically that would also make trump and unelected dictator if you think about it... so nothing wrong with faith.
I didn't see any source on the link. Just a trust me bro situation.
I don't know why folks attach themselves to much to sauceless stuff. I don't think the intention of the Q operation was to turn millions into hopium addicts where facts, data, reasoning and critical thinking are put on the back seat to "things that make me feel good".
Maybe this, maybe that, maybe, maybe, maybe. The whole 'secret information/massive news!/non-evidence-based narratives' thing seems to have taken on a life of its own and simply become alt media replacement for the tabloid industry.
BTW, a bit of digging on this turns up our favorite "super inside information I'm with Space Force" Jan Halper interview from last month that say when SHE talked with Brunson in July, "he was under an NDA".
https://goldenageofgaia.com/2024/11/11/dr-jan-halper-hayes-on-elijah-streams-october-31-2024/
So she says. Trust me, sis? Maybe so he said? Trust me bro.
In the absence of concrete evidence, I'll wait to I set off the fireworks...
See also "Loy Brunson joins..... Charlie Ward".
Er, no thanks.
Wild prediction: we are going to see a LOT of this pseudo-conspiracy theory guff just wash out the door as DJT actually cleans up the govt, restores America and executes the plan concretely over the next 4 years. They have run rabid for 4+ years, particularly since Q stopped posting, surviving off the movement inspired by Q. I predict they are going to run out of fuel soon as the real work and real purpose of the Q movement unfolds.
Can’t wait for that. My sister and her husband says Q is practically not real. All is a psyop operation. Yes they voted President Trump but still saying I am crazy. Say that all Q says is not happening.
Well, perhaps they are not half wrong. History will tell. it is very clear that Q was a psyop. But it was a powerful, truth motivated psyop, to wake up millions and trigger a change in awareness in the wider population. I think it is possible that many of the things that some people expect as a result of Q might not happen in the way they expect. I would say that Q is about waking up. Learning about the reality of the world we live in, and learning to realize that we've been programmed and learning to unprogram ourselves. That also means, not adhering to our own interpretation of Q. Also, to distinguish between Q and anons. Adrenochrome? That's not Q. That's anon. (there may well be verious levels of truth to different aspects of the anon theories around adrenochrome, but will we ever know? I don't know.
The reports of police officer reactions to the Weiner laptop are the most intense. But whether this level of underbelly will be fully exposed, I do not know.
So I think it is OK to termper one's interpretations and expectations around Q, and to adopt a stance of rational reasonableness. There are somethings about Q we can be certain of: it's tremendous impact on awakening, and the triggering of exposure of many things we never really knew about. If you emphasize this aspect, perhaps you sister and husband can recognize that Q is real.
In other words, make a mental distinction between:
Things we know for sure about Q: it's impact, the proofs, the benefits of the approaches Q encouraged
Things we do not know for sure about Q: how much was disinformation, how much was actual information, what the full purpose of the Q operation was, how it will all play out, etc.
Being clear and frank about what we do know and what we do not know, by drawing a distinction between what we know, what we believe and conjecture, we are not being disloyal to Q. Quite the opposite. That's being very Q ish.
The corrupt cabal utilized massive psyops and media-based brainwashing for many decades to lead populations into a state of trance and delusion, while robbing and murdering us all the while, but the Q operation was a psyop to snap us out of this trance, liberate our capacity to think properly, freely, for ourselves, while inspiring us to dig and find the truth about things.
For me, this is the essence of Q, and all the other stuff is simply part of the methodology. From Big Mike to Face Masks, to Gunatanamo trials, to JFK jr, etc, there is a LOT of stuff in the Awakening sphere that did NOT directly come from Q. To me, all that stuff is expendable. I can believe or not believe, without any major impact on the benefits of the Q operation. (personally, I think that actually a lot of the belief aspects are detrimental because they go against the kind of mental freedom that Q was attempting to instil. But that's me....)
How many coincidences before they say, well ok.
The checkmate and 57-43 one the other day was crazy.
That is meaningful to some people, but not to others. Myself, a very strong believer in the Q operation, treat such 'proofs' as the checkmate 57-43 thing will little importance. Some are absolutely convinced that its what they think it is. I adopt a arms length skepticism, precisely because I have a LOT of experience with beliefs, emotions and how they can impact on freedom of thought.
To me, such proofs are the least important aspects of the Q operation, and by and large, negligible. During the operation itself, they had a very important function: to expose and reinforce the validity of Q itself as an operation. After 2021, I think with close to 5000 Q drops, 365 days in a year, 24 hours in a day, you are definitely going to get crossover and coincidences.
I don't think they are helpful. Why? Because they are unnecessary to validate Q. And, we do NOT have Q around to correct or check any mistaken takes.
Learn from the Q operation in the period of Q. That should be enough to go on. Some things might role out that show an amazing connection between drops and current events, but without Q directing us, we have to apply 5X the discernment, critical thinking, reasoning, evidence, and even skepticism. Otherwise, it is far too easy to fall in to a pseudo-religious stance that reinforces one's conclusions and beliefs by their own power.
imo.
If logic were to prevail, we would call this Q an coup de ta, and they are overthrowing the government... logic is out the window when it comes to this stuff. Technically that would also make trump and unelected dictator if you think about it... so nothing wrong with faith.
????
????
????
????