Over the years I have learned a lot about the SSCI. I am not the biggest fan of Sundance, but his research and understanding of our nation's intelligence community and how it affects everything is second to none.
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) created the systems that permit intelligence weaponization. The SSCI is the organizational institution that supports the Fourth Branch of Government, the intelligence branch. Keep in mind, the SSCI previously created a bipartisan “Restrict Act,” to deal with what they deemed dangerous information on the internet (under auspices of TikTok ban). SSCI Chairman Mark Warner is the current enabler of the continued weaponized intel operations.
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, SSCI, is the epicenter of the larger intelligence apparatus that controls government. It was/is the SSCI who helped to create the weaponized system we call the Fourth Branch of Government. The SSCI is the institutional origin where the outcomes of the FISA courts, domestic surveillance, and downstream consequences of the Patriot Act are supported and facilitated.
The chair (Warner) and vice-chair (Rubio) of the committee are also members of the Gang of Eight, intelligence oversight group. It is laughable to see Senator Mark Warner decry the possibility of national security leaks and compromises within the classified document issue. Warner himself was the most consequential leaker during the Trump-Russia investigation (Wolfe leak of FISA application), and the SSCI facilitated everything that happened in the Mueller investigation.
However, at the mid-point of the interview Bartiromo asks the SSCI Chairman about the committee refusal to provide Senators Grassley and Johnson with documents and transcripts from testimony previously given to the SSCI in their Russia investigation.
While explaining the reason for the refusal to share transcripts, Senator Rubio shares that all prior testimony to the committee was provided with the expressed agreement that none of the witness testimony would be shared with anyone else. A remarkably self-serving construct with the deliberate outcome of allowing strategic leaks and narrative assembly without sunlight on the actual questioning.
In this interview Ratcliffe outlines the scale and scope of the abuses as well as what they mean in the context of corrupt and illegal DOJ and FBI activity.
I just pulled out a few highlights. If anyone wants to truly understand the internal machinations of the SSCI and how they play a HUGE role in the weaponization of the US Government through weaponizing the Intelligence Agencies against the President and the American People, I would recommend starting here.
Thanks. Additionally I just fully read this. I think Sundance has a good understanding of how government works, and I find his information very educational.
It would be amazing if during Trumps first 100 days a convention of states was call with the sole item for consideration being the repeal of the 17th amendment to return selection of senators back to state legislators.
All other elected federal corruption is dependent on a corrupt and ineffective Senate. If we correct the problems with the Senate and reconnect the representation within the chamber to the state-level legislative bodies, we will then see immediate change. However, there would be ZERO institutional allies in this effort.
I would put the SSCI at the head of the corruption in the Senate. It's one of the reasons I feel strongly that the SSCI needs a MAGA leader, if that is even possible. The same RINOs that just elected Thune would never put a MAGA in charge of the SSCI.
I wonder if VP Vance could step in as Leader of the Senate and appoint a MAGA Leader for SSCI?
Do we really trust SCOUTS to prevent a runaway convention? My concern is that there will be too many traitors, paid for with Soros type funds, that will destroy the intent of the constitution.
I hope I am wrong on that if a convention happens. I had thought it was a good idea until an old gentleman delegate pointed out to me that SCOTUS has not been the friend of limited government since at least when Roe v Wade happened.
We have some great justices & if this Brunson case ends up removing justices who failed their duties to uphold the constitution and also if Trump replaces them with ultra Constitutionalist picks, then I see a convention of states being a no brainer.
The worst possible thing that could happen with Cornyn would be him taking over as SSCI.
Ask yourself, which is a more important, having ally at senate leadership, or having non-neocon at SSCI.
Take out biggest targets first, and isolate smaller targets.
Over the years I have learned a lot about the SSCI. I am not the biggest fan of Sundance, but his research and understanding of our nation's intelligence community and how it affects everything is second to none.
Sunday Talks – Senator Mark Warner Says SSCI Bill to Block All Presidents from Fourth Branch Classified Intelligence Close to Completion
Sunday Talks, SSCI Chair Warner and Vice-Chair Rubio Give Their Perspectives on Classified Document Issues and Control Operations
Remarkable, and Revealing, Interview With SSCI Chairman Marco Rubio…
John Ratcliffe Explains Why Corrupt Senators on SSCI Would Never Allow His Nomination – And Why a Senate Impeachment Trial is A Risk…
I just pulled out a few highlights. If anyone wants to truly understand the internal machinations of the SSCI and how they play a HUGE role in the weaponization of the US Government through weaponizing the Intelligence Agencies against the President and the American People, I would recommend starting here.
Thanks. Additionally I just fully read this. I think Sundance has a good understanding of how government works, and I find his information very educational.
It would be amazing if during Trumps first 100 days a convention of states was call with the sole item for consideration being the repeal of the 17th amendment to return selection of senators back to state legislators.
Thanks, fren.
This is a good summation in many ways.
I would put the SSCI at the head of the corruption in the Senate. It's one of the reasons I feel strongly that the SSCI needs a MAGA leader, if that is even possible. The same RINOs that just elected Thune would never put a MAGA in charge of the SSCI.
I wonder if VP Vance could step in as Leader of the Senate and appoint a MAGA Leader for SSCI?
Do we really trust SCOUTS to prevent a runaway convention? My concern is that there will be too many traitors, paid for with Soros type funds, that will destroy the intent of the constitution.
I hope I am wrong on that if a convention happens. I had thought it was a good idea until an old gentleman delegate pointed out to me that SCOTUS has not been the friend of limited government since at least when Roe v Wade happened.
We have some great justices & if this Brunson case ends up removing justices who failed their duties to uphold the constitution and also if Trump replaces them with ultra Constitutionalist picks, then I see a convention of states being a no brainer.