Climate-related would be deaths where the cause of death is directly or indirectly attributable to a feature or aspect of the climate. i.e. a hurricane, a storm, a drought, etc, etc.
Proximity (in direct contact with) has nothing to do with causality. Most humans die in direct contact with oxygen, but these are not 'oxygen-related deaths'.
If I were a commie making up statistics to fit an agenda, a car wreck fatality could be defined as an "oxygen related death" if the wreck occurred during fog, rain, or snow, or due to ice on the road.
You see comrade, all of those environmental factors are a result of the effects of barometric pressure- which of course is oxygen related...also, without oxygen, there would have been no water, snow or ice...
...And furthermore, gas powered car engines also rely on oxygen to run. Had it not been for evil corporations abusing oxygen by wasting it from burning it in internal combustion (car) engines, those fatalities would never have happened...
And, Snopes, Farcebook, and CNN fact checkers would all agree with me.
Your initial comment needed more context, It was a bit ambiguous, because you started out with questioning what defines a climate related death and then proposing a reasoning that all death is "climate-related".
I'm assuming you aren't a communist, so at this juncture, I can only interpret your comment as a foray into sarcasm, from "what.... to right?". In which case, it makes more sense.
Almost a satirical criticism of the way that Marxism and political satanism twists language and subverts it to their malignant agenda, as opposed to lifting up language as an instrument for truth and freedom.
Climate-related would be deaths where the cause of death is directly or indirectly attributable to a feature or aspect of the climate. i.e. a hurricane, a storm, a drought, etc, etc.
Proximity (in direct contact with) has nothing to do with causality. Most humans die in direct contact with oxygen, but these are not 'oxygen-related deaths'.
If I were a commie making up statistics to fit an agenda, a car wreck fatality could be defined as an "oxygen related death" if the wreck occurred during fog, rain, or snow, or due to ice on the road.
And, Snopes, Farcebook, and CNN fact checkers would all agree with me.
Ah, ok.
Your initial comment needed more context, It was a bit ambiguous, because you started out with questioning what defines a climate related death and then proposing a reasoning that all death is "climate-related".
I'm assuming you aren't a communist, so at this juncture, I can only interpret your comment as a foray into sarcasm, from "what.... to right?". In which case, it makes more sense.
Almost a satirical criticism of the way that Marxism and political satanism twists language and subverts it to their malignant agenda, as opposed to lifting up language as an instrument for truth and freedom.
Point taken.
Dihydrogen monoxide related deaths are a major problem though!