Cleaning up the whole place may simply be technically difficult, lots of code that has presumably been put there piece by piece over a long time and now you have to figure how it all connects and affects other pieces before taking something out so that it keeps on working. And they may keep on finding surprises. It was not, after all, designed or done by them, makes cleaning it all more difficult.
Just because MAGA have huge followings doesn't mean shadowbans aren't in place. We aren't advocating for just our speech to be free.
There are still search bans, algorithmic bans and "tie" bans which limits your reach to people you have ties to. There are also reply bans. Ever seen a notification on a tweet that says there are replies, click it and none show up? That's a reply ban.
Maybe he should remove the functions to shadow ban, which are still in place at Twitter.
Cleaning up the whole place may simply be technically difficult, lots of code that has presumably been put there piece by piece over a long time and now you have to figure how it all connects and affects other pieces before taking something out so that it keeps on working. And they may keep on finding surprises. It was not, after all, designed or done by them, makes cleaning it all more difficult.
A bowl of spaghetti enters the chat
Especially if the offending code is not labeled obviously where you can just do a search for "ShadowBan==Yes".
deploy some ai to analyze the code
I don't see that. Many MAGA have huge followings.
Just because MAGA have huge followings doesn't mean shadowbans aren't in place. We aren't advocating for just our speech to be free.
There are still search bans, algorithmic bans and "tie" bans which limits your reach to people you have ties to. There are also reply bans. Ever seen a notification on a tweet that says there are replies, click it and none show up? That's a reply ban.