I wonder how opinions would change if the masses discovered or were told it was the pharma industry that killed him and planted distractions (shell casings w/inscriptions) to keep him from flipping on them.
This is a solid theory, so WHAT IF the reason they have been refusing so many claims is because they have documented proof these are vaccine related injuries and their stance is the person volunteered to participate in the experiment?
The only thing I wonder about is the /pol/ classic "what did he know, bros?". This reeks of a hit to me.
Outside of that, I am not surprised that we arent seeing a massive sweeping for the guy. Whether we like it or not, the Left is very good at sleuthing and doxxing people - better than the Right is (and this is by virtue of the Left being largely feminine - anyone who knows, knows that femininity is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy better at research and uncovering secrets than masculinity is).
And a CEO of a mega corporation, of an industry that is broken as deeply as health care in the United States is - all while they are making money hand over first through denying due coverage to patients who dont have the means to legally force the company to comply with the policy (and make no mistake, this absolutely happens - more than you would care to admit) - isnt going to garner a tremendous amount of sympathy from the Feminine Left.
I am a tad bit shocked that the Right is going so hard into defending the guy and his status - like, cmon guys. We dont have to defend people who are making generational wealth overseeing a fucked up industry. Stop defending CEOs of broken industries, and start just focusing on whether or not this guy was trying to maybe do better by it - and was killed for trying so.
You arent going to get an ounce of sympathy from literally anybody playing the "THIS IS WRONG, YOU SHOULDNT CONDONE VIOLENCE OF ANY KIND" card. When shit is broken, people shoot. Dont have to defend it, just ask: was this guy killed for trying to make it better?
At best, he was trying to be a good guy and was targeted on a hit because he was going to say something.
At worst, he was a CEO of a company that made a great deal of money doing broken and sometimes actually evil things, and deserves no sympathy. Just because the Left is celebrating doesnt mean we should be doing the exact opposite to compensate.
I wonder how opinions would change if the masses discovered or were told it was the pharma industry that killed him and planted distractions (shell casings w/inscriptions) to keep him from flipping on them.
This is a solid theory, so WHAT IF the reason they have been refusing so many claims is because they have documented proof these are vaccine related injuries and their stance is the person volunteered to participate in the experiment?
Message to future whistle blowers?
The only thing I wonder about is the /pol/ classic "what did he know, bros?". This reeks of a hit to me.
Outside of that, I am not surprised that we arent seeing a massive sweeping for the guy. Whether we like it or not, the Left is very good at sleuthing and doxxing people - better than the Right is (and this is by virtue of the Left being largely feminine - anyone who knows, knows that femininity is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy better at research and uncovering secrets than masculinity is).
And a CEO of a mega corporation, of an industry that is broken as deeply as health care in the United States is - all while they are making money hand over first through denying due coverage to patients who dont have the means to legally force the company to comply with the policy (and make no mistake, this absolutely happens - more than you would care to admit) - isnt going to garner a tremendous amount of sympathy from the Feminine Left.
I am a tad bit shocked that the Right is going so hard into defending the guy and his status - like, cmon guys. We dont have to defend people who are making generational wealth overseeing a fucked up industry. Stop defending CEOs of broken industries, and start just focusing on whether or not this guy was trying to maybe do better by it - and was killed for trying so.
You arent going to get an ounce of sympathy from literally anybody playing the "THIS IS WRONG, YOU SHOULDNT CONDONE VIOLENCE OF ANY KIND" card. When shit is broken, people shoot. Dont have to defend it, just ask: was this guy killed for trying to make it better?
What?
TL;DU
At best, he was trying to be a good guy and was targeted on a hit because he was going to say something.
At worst, he was a CEO of a company that made a great deal of money doing broken and sometimes actually evil things, and deserves no sympathy. Just because the Left is celebrating doesnt mean we should be doing the exact opposite to compensate.
Worthwhile theory.