How about just stopping the support instead of interjecting an idea that would acclimate us to the idea of a North American Union? This is the same shit a lot of us have been fighting for well over a decade. Remember the Amero coin or the highway from Canada through Mexico? I sure hope he isn't serious.
Right now, he might be just floating the ideas just to see how people react, like always with any proposals. Ultimately its all about if majority of citizens agree to an idea or not. Same thing happened with plandemic, people accepted the idea (through movies, media fear porn, etc) and it was executed when majority of people expressed the possibility.
I've heard about this idea of greater US (US + Mexico + Canada + UK + AU & NZ) coming under single administration couple of years ago in the conspiracy channels. So, I am not surprised its coming into light now.
The problem is that just because someone can convince the majority to go along with an idea, doesn't mean it's what is right for America. Now, I'm not saying Trump doesn't have an alternative plan or what he's doing is pimping a NAU. But the idea of the NAU is not something I feel is good for America and seeding that idea in the minds of Americans is a negative, IMO. I hope there's another agenda in play here.
What would it mean for Canada and Mexico to become states? I'm just not sure of the process both would be open boards and a steady flow of people into the USA, I can't wrap my head around it?
If Mexico became a state the crime would cleaned up quickly. Mexico gets a lot of sunshine and has beautiful beaches and climate. The rich people in America would be pouring money into it and making it into their own oasis, as has been done to many parts of Florida. The government would be pressured into taking down the cartels. The rich and middle class would be moving into Mexico in large numbers to take advantage of the low col and cheap property. Even the poor would be migrating to Mexico for the new opportunity. It would essentially be the closest thing to a new frontier for America since the annexing of Hawaii.
In comparison to Canada or Greenland, it's a far better location to obtain.
same with Cuba. With all the money we've spent taking care of their people who couldn't or wouldn't tolerate the communist govt there any longer, the price Cuba ought to pay is to lose its sovereignty and become a U.S. state.
He is simply restating the globalists' plan. Do you really think the hundreds of billions given to Mexico and Canada went to the needs of the people? No, the funds were used to fill up the globalists' coffers.
I can see patriot forces in Canada agreeing to bring their 10 provinces into a combined republic with the USA, but with Mexico there are too many reasons for both sides to say no.
Language, history (Mexican-American War), crime, attitudes toward socialism and welfare... Mexico and the USA are just too different and Mexico would be a burden to the U.S. Plus we'd have to deal with generations of Mexican 'freedom fighters'.
How about just stopping the support instead of interjecting an idea that would acclimate us to the idea of a North American Union? This is the same shit a lot of us have been fighting for well over a decade. Remember the Amero coin or the highway from Canada through Mexico? I sure hope he isn't serious.
Right now, he might be just floating the ideas just to see how people react, like always with any proposals. Ultimately its all about if majority of citizens agree to an idea or not. Same thing happened with plandemic, people accepted the idea (through movies, media fear porn, etc) and it was executed when majority of people expressed the possibility.
I've heard about this idea of greater US (US + Mexico + Canada + UK + AU & NZ) coming under single administration couple of years ago in the conspiracy channels. So, I am not surprised its coming into light now.
The problem is that just because someone can convince the majority to go along with an idea, doesn't mean it's what is right for America. Now, I'm not saying Trump doesn't have an alternative plan or what he's doing is pimping a NAU. But the idea of the NAU is not something I feel is good for America and seeding that idea in the minds of Americans is a negative, IMO. I hope there's another agenda in play here.
I do trust he has a winning plan with this conversation. My guess the floated idea is a move on the board.
Wasn't this the goal of the Trilateral Commission, to join Canada, US, and Mexico into on sphere?
What would it mean for Canada and Mexico to become states? I'm just not sure of the process both would be open boards and a steady flow of people into the USA, I can't wrap my head around it?
If Mexico became a state the crime would cleaned up quickly. Mexico gets a lot of sunshine and has beautiful beaches and climate. The rich people in America would be pouring money into it and making it into their own oasis, as has been done to many parts of Florida. The government would be pressured into taking down the cartels. The rich and middle class would be moving into Mexico in large numbers to take advantage of the low col and cheap property. Even the poor would be migrating to Mexico for the new opportunity. It would essentially be the closest thing to a new frontier for America since the annexing of Hawaii.
In comparison to Canada or Greenland, it's a far better location to obtain.
Zones is a step towards globalization plan
same with Cuba. With all the money we've spent taking care of their people who couldn't or wouldn't tolerate the communist govt there any longer, the price Cuba ought to pay is to lose its sovereignty and become a U.S. state.
Trolling or seriousness in jest?
He is simply restating the globalists' plan. Do you really think the hundreds of billions given to Mexico and Canada went to the needs of the people? No, the funds were used to fill up the globalists' coffers.
I can see patriot forces in Canada agreeing to bring their 10 provinces into a combined republic with the USA, but with Mexico there are too many reasons for both sides to say no.
Language, history (Mexican-American War), crime, attitudes toward socialism and welfare... Mexico and the USA are just too different and Mexico would be a burden to the U.S. Plus we'd have to deal with generations of Mexican 'freedom fighters'.
twstalker - https://twstalker.com/bennyjohnson/status/1865788981570384294
.."Mexico will pay for it."