Yeah...no. It's a spin which I find unlikely. If this were true, why then give in, compromise and give them a 3rd bill which adds back in some of the things which Trump knows America doesn't want?
Why negotiate at all if this were truly a strategy? Trump would force THEM to choose a path. We're talking about the man who wrote the Art of the Deal. No, whatever this was, Trump wanted a deal, and he was forced to accept a compromise that was less than ideal. Now, the morning after defeat, people are trying to spin this as a victory.
Don't get me wrong. I like Trump. I believe in him. But I don't believe the white hats control everything. This was a loss. That sometimes happens in war. It's not the end of the world. And now we know who is truly on the side of MAGA in a crunch, and who is instead loyal to the globalist's cause.
Next time, we need to do better. A lot better. And Johnson needs to be primaried out of office for not having a spine.
How many times has Johnson spoken to Trump at Mar a Lago? You ever see McConnel sitting there with Trump? Or any other RINO. Why was he invited to the suite at the Army Navy Game? Why was he included in that photo eating McDonalds with Trumps closest public facing advisors? Why did Trump push for Johnson to be Speaker?
I think we need to take a step away from the narrative and see this clear eyed. Joes argument has merit.
Whether or not Johnson turns out to be a sleeper agent, I don't know.
But on the face of it, Joe's argument makes no sense. A deeper psyop is always possible, but it's not credible as he describes it. There was no reason for Trump to have to concede to a 3rd, compromise bill if Joe's argument had merit.
What would the people be shown by this? It's business as usual and it has been for many many many decades or even longer. Ho-hum.
The fact is, Johnson is a POS. I for one said it from the day he took the chair and I'm not alone. Nothing new here. If this kind of crap was going to make people suddenly wake up and pay attention they would have done it with Paul Ryan, and they certainly would have with Nancy Pelosi at the helm. How about four years of giveaways to Ukraine, Big Pharma, the MIC, Ecuador (WTF?), Pakistan gender studies, college loan bailouts (or attempts to), and on and on. If people don't see it by now they won't so what is being gained by another screw job to we the people?
Yeah...no. It's a spin which I find unlikely. If this were true, why then give in, compromise and give them a 3rd bill which adds back in some of the things which Trump knows America doesn't want?
Why negotiate at all if this were truly a strategy? Trump would force THEM to choose a path. We're talking about the man who wrote the Art of the Deal. No, whatever this was, Trump wanted a deal, and he was forced to accept a compromise that was less than ideal. Now, the morning after defeat, people are trying to spin this as a victory.
Don't get me wrong. I like Trump. I believe in him. But I don't believe the white hats control everything. This was a loss. That sometimes happens in war. It's not the end of the world. And now we know who is truly on the side of MAGA in a crunch, and who is instead loyal to the globalist's cause.
Next time, we need to do better. A lot better. And Johnson needs to be primaried out of office for not having a spine.
How many times has Johnson spoken to Trump at Mar a Lago? You ever see McConnel sitting there with Trump? Or any other RINO. Why was he invited to the suite at the Army Navy Game? Why was he included in that photo eating McDonalds with Trumps closest public facing advisors? Why did Trump push for Johnson to be Speaker?
I think we need to take a step away from the narrative and see this clear eyed. Joes argument has merit.
That said I trust nobody but Trump.
Whether or not Johnson turns out to be a sleeper agent, I don't know.
But on the face of it, Joe's argument makes no sense. A deeper psyop is always possible, but it's not credible as he describes it. There was no reason for Trump to have to concede to a 3rd, compromise bill if Joe's argument had merit.
How is that a white hat loss when the main goal is to not tell people but show them? That photo speaks volumes.
What would the people be shown by this? It's business as usual and it has been for many many many decades or even longer. Ho-hum.
The fact is, Johnson is a POS. I for one said it from the day he took the chair and I'm not alone. Nothing new here. If this kind of crap was going to make people suddenly wake up and pay attention they would have done it with Paul Ryan, and they certainly would have with Nancy Pelosi at the helm. How about four years of giveaways to Ukraine, Big Pharma, the MIC, Ecuador (WTF?), Pakistan gender studies, college loan bailouts (or attempts to), and on and on. If people don't see it by now they won't so what is being gained by another screw job to we the people?
And IMHO one photo doesn't mean sh!t.