This is a good post but communism was actually first put into practice by the pilgrims in the early 1600s. After death and suffering and realizing the failure of the system they reverse course and prospered.

https://www.heritage.org/markets-and-finance/commentary/pilgrims-beat-communism-free-market

Recalling the story of the Pilgrims is a Thanksgiving tradition, but do you know the real story behind their triumph over hunger and poverty at Plymouth Colony nearly four centuries ago? Their salvation stemmed not so much from the charitable gestures of local Indians, but from their courageous decision to embrace the free-market principle of private property ownership a century and a half before Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations.

Writing in his diary of the dire economic straits and self-destructive behavior that consumed his fellow Puritans shortly after their arrival, Governor William Bradford painted a picture of destitute settlers selling their clothes and bed coverings for food while others "became servants to the Indians," cutting wood and fetching water in exchange for "a capful of corn." The most desperate among them starved, with Bradford recounting how one settler, in gathering shellfish along the shore, "was so weak … he stuck fast in the mud and was found dead in the place."

The colony's leaders identified the source of their problem as a particularly vile form of what Bradford called "communism." Property in Plymouth Colony, he observed, was communally owned and cultivated. This system ("taking away of property and bringing [it] into a commonwealth") bred "confusion and discontent" and "retarded much employment that would have been to [the settlers'] benefit and comfort."

Brink of Extermination

The most able and fit young men in Plymouth thought it an "injustice" that they were paid the same as those "not able to do a quarter the other could." Women, meanwhile, viewed the communal chores they were required to perform for others as a form of "slavery." On the brink of extermination, the Colony's leaders changed course and allotted a parcel of land to each settler, hoping the private ownership of farmland would encourage self-sufficiency and lead to the cultivation of more corn and other foodstuffs.

As Adam Smith would have predicted, this new system worked famously. "This had very good success," Bradford reported, "for it made all hands very industrious." In fact, "much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been" and productivity increased. "Women," for example, "went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn."

The famine that nearly wiped out the Pilgrims in 1623 gave way to a period of agricultural abundance that enabled the Massachusetts settlers to set down permanent roots in the New World, prosper, and play an indispensable role in the ultimate success of the American experiment.

A profoundly religious man, Bradford saw the hand of God in the Pilgrims' economic recovery. Their success, he observed, "may well evince the vanity of that conceit...that the taking away of property... would make [men] happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God." Bradford surmised, "God in his wisdom saw another course fitter for them."

I would bet it's been used many many times in the past. I've always assumed the ancient Egyptians had a system like this....

This does not surprise me at all!

Great post! I was waiting for someone to post info on this. Marx was funded by the Jesuits as well.

Looks like a concentration camp setup…. Very strange.

Moar:

The Government established by them in Paraguay was essentially monarchical. It could not have been otherwise under the principles of their constitution. Under the false name of a Christian republic, it was, to all intents and purposes, a theocratic State, so constructed as to free it from all European influences except such as emanated from their superior at Rome. All the intercourse they had with the Church and the pope was through him, and whatsoever commands he gave were uninquiringly obeyed by them, without stopping to investigate or concerning themselves in the least to know whether the Church and the pope approved or disapproved them. In order to impress the natives with the idea of their independence and of their superiority over the monastic orders and the Church ecclesiastics, they practiced the most artful means to persuade them to hold no intercourse with either Spaniards or Portuguese, upon the ground that they could not do so without encountering the example of their vices and immoralities. The unsuspecting Indians were easily seduced by acts of kindness, and the result was that, in the course of a brief period, they succeeded in establishing a number of what were called Reductions — or, more properly speaking, villages — with multitudes of Indians assembled about them; the whole aggregating, in the end, several hundred thousand. These constituted the Jesuit State, and were all, by the mere ceremony of baptism, brought under Jesuit dominion. At each Reduction the natives were allowed to select a secular magistracy, with limited and unimportant powers over such temporal affairs as could be iutrusted to them without impairing the theocratic feature of the Government. But in order to provide against the possi- bility of permitting even these few temporal affairs from being conducted independently of them, they adopted the precaution of providing that, before any important decisions were carried iuto effect, they should obtain their sanction — as " spiritual shepherds." There never was anywhere a more thorough and complete blending of Church and State together.

---Thompson, 1894, (pp. 173-174), "Footprints of the Jesuits"

And also https://greatawakening.win/p/19Ax2bxgVN/x/c/4eRUFv0UhJw?d=50

But...they brought it to Russia AND China.

Oh boy oh goodly gosh! Moar

Leopold Senghor of Senegal, the inventor of the hideous term "Negritude," the inspirator of the Franz Fanon operation, a friend of Franz-Josef Strauss, ac­cording to his personal confession, was converted to Catholicism by none other than Pierre Teilhard de Chardin himself! Both Bani-Sadr and Pol Pot, the Islamic revolutionary and the chief of the Khmer Rouge respectively, were educated at Jesuit Jacques Soustelle's Ecole Pratique des Etudes Rautes at the Sorbonne, which to this day remains under the joint control of the old synarchist crown of France and the Solvay Institute­ Louvain University emanations of the Jesuit-controlled Belgian monarchy. The list could go on to include the happily aborted "Michel Pablo" period of the Algerian revolution---an early attempt to launch "Islamic fun­damentalism" years before Ayatollah Khomeini's rev­olution.

A more elucidating point can be made about the case of Latin American movements; that continent being the universally acknowledged hotbed of the Jesuit order's "Liberation Theology." Modern Jacobinism begins at the very top with the theology of Karl Rahner, who enforces the principle of cultural relativism in theology-asserting the necessity of theological respect for such culturally relative values as polygamy, homosexuality, and ritual scrifice, provided they are accepted in one's traditional tribal "value system."

From there, the theological principle of cultural relativism is taken up by the grand theologian of "Liberation," Hans Kung of Tiibingen University, and is promoted into the field deployments of the Society of Jesus in the ghettos, the favellas and the latifundios of Latin America. The technique is faithfully replicated by British intelligence in various distinct insurgency-coun­terinsurgency and destabilization projects.

The British, since at least 1688, have been crude vulgarizers of the Jesuit technique. This is the reason why the popular imagination, in colonial or formerly colonial nations, identifies the transparent and crude British with the principle of "divide-and-rule," while the more sophisticated and elusive Jesuits are identified with the abstraction "hypocrisy."

Before the 1964 General Congregation of the Jesuit order elected Father Pedro Arrupe as the Father Gen­ eral, the overtly "leftist" projects of the Society were being run by the Society's "front" organization, the Maryknoll Fathers. After 1964, the Jesuits started open­ ly espousing the "leftist" posture as well as their tra­ ditional "rightist" facade.

The first Jesuits were crypto‑Jews. The Millennium Report May 11, 202

https://themillenniumreport.com/2020/05/the-first-jesuits-were-crypto%E2%80%91jews/

The first Jesuits were crypto‑Jews. Ignatius Loyola himself was a crypto‑Jew of the Occult Cabala. A crypto‑Jew is a Jew who converts to another religion and outwardly embraces the new religion, while secretly maintaining Jewish practices. As John Torell explains: “In 1491 San Ignacio de Loyola was born in the Basque province of Guipuzcoa, Spain. His parents were Marranos and at the time of his birth the family was very wealthy. As a young man he became a member of the Jewish Illuminati order in Spain. As a cover for his crypto Jewish activities, he became very active as a Roman Catholic. On May 20, 1521 Ignatius (as he was now called) was wounded in a battle, and became a semi‑cripple. Unable to succeed in the military and political arena, he started a quest for holiness and eventually ended up in Paris where he studied for the priesthood. In 1539 he had moved to Rome where he founded the “JESUIT ORDER,” which was to become the most vile, bloody and persecuting order in the Roman Catholic Church. In 1540, the current Pope Paul III approved the order. At Loyola’s death in 1556 there were more than 1000 members in the Jesuit order, located in a number of nations. “Ignatius of Loyola’s secretary, Polanco, was of Jewish descent and was the only person present at Loyola’s deathbed. James Lainez, who succeeded Loyola as the second Jesuit General, was also of Jewish descent. Jews were attracted to the Jesuit order and joined in large numbers. Lacunza was no exception. He was a Jew, which explains why he introduced the eschatological teaching of a return to the Jewish animal sacrifices during the Millennium. (In a book titled The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty published in 1812, 11 years after the death of its author, Jesuit Emanuel de Lacunza who, wrote under the fictitious pen name of a purportedly converted Jew, Rabbi Juan Josaphat Ben Ezra, in order to conceal his identity and to make his writings more palatable to the Protestant readers. He promoted the writings of sixteenth century Jesuit priest Francisco Ribera, developing a futuristic perspective which restricted the prophetic fulfillments in the Book of Revelation to the end of the world). Lacunza also wrote that during a millennium after the tribulation the Jewish animal sacrifices would be reinstated along with the Eucharist (the mass) of the Catholic Church. Lacunza has followed after Jewish fables and replaced the commandments of God with the commandments of men. That doctrine gives the Jews primacy in God’s plan and relegates Christians to a prophetic parenthetical to be supplanted by the Jews during the thousand year earthly reign of Christ.

Nice try, Diddy.

if the Catholics were the original communist, then why did the Judeo- Freemasons declare war on Catholic civilization after the French revolution?

There is definitely a blueprint to destabilizing western civilization and the color revolution script has been followed since 1776. However, the Catholic Church is not the perpetuator of it; It is the victim of it and we have been the only ones that are really stood up to communism and any significant way.