Not Sure IF this has been introduced here. I have noticed a Couple of Postings on Truth Social, About a potential Trump Card. Trump Refusing the Inauguration would introduce the Military - as they are sworn to uphold the Constitution. Maybe why there is a Jan 19th Rally? Will research more into it. Sounds Plausible? We are running out of time, for A LOT of things we were told could/would happen -
Comments (12)
sorted by:
I think the miltary is not operating in the open. They are doing mostly covert operations.
I am not sure we will get mass public confirmation about this.
Well, unless we are switching from a Corporation to a Republic, and not telling anyone? The down ballot votes for 24 were switched, as well as countless other elections. 2020 Congress Certified a fraudulent election. At this point, there is really not a valid Government? I understand about covert, but IF it is really the only way, and Transparency will prevail I believe we will have to see them?
I believe Trump is going to upset people on both sides of the political spectrum. It seems he is navigating a path between two extremes—neither wanting the extreme left to dominate nor the extreme right to prevail.
I don’t think he’ll publicly target figures like Obama or Hillary.
It seems he’s aiming to protect the institution to some degree, even while challenging certain power structures. For example, I suspect behind the scenes, he may have diminished the influence of elites like the Rothschilds, allowing them to quietly step back rather than creating public chaos.
Consider how many people on this board express violent sentiments, like calls for "hanging" individuals. Trump doesn’t appear to support that mindset. I think it’s because of the precedent it would set for the future. Instead, his focus seems to be on reforming the system and increasing transparency for the public.
I’m skeptical about the possibility of mass public arrests. In my view, Trump will avoid that route to prevent setting a dangerous legal precedent for future leaders.
This could explain the phrase, "The end is not for everyone." Some people may desire harsh, visible punishments for those they perceive as bad actors, but I don’t think Trump will pursue that approach publicly. Instead, his actions seem more calculated and focused on long-term stability.
Reminds me of Kim Clement's prophecy from 2008.
Sounds Plausible - Original was March- Moved to January. DJT won, but the Down Ballot showed Cheating.
What do you mean by “refusing the inauguration”?
Good Question..Maybe that is what He will explain on the 19TH? We are nearing Uncharted territory - No President ever had the Military behind them being Inaugurated - No one has ever Refused an Inauguration - No one has ever held a Rally the Day before in D.C. - That list can go on, and on..
Rally on the 19th ? missed that somehow.
Jan 19th MIGHT be the real swearing in of the President of the Republic, not the 20th which would be the swearing in of the President of the United States of America which is a totally bankrupt corporation.
i saw a rumor posted here that Trump would decline to take office, revealing diagnosis of cognitive impairment, definitely a swipe at Biden's legacy. This would leave him available to campaign for congressional candidates full time, also revealing no cognitive impairment - other than acting as though he is the president. If kennedy or gabbard got installed as vp, foreign countries would have a clean slate to deal with, a chance to prove their worthiness.
OP can you link one of the TS posts for context? I’m looking now…
I don't understand. If Trump can't be inaugurated for any reason, Vance would assume the role. And then Johnson if Vance was also unable. They would continue as acting president until such time as Trump took the oath of office, voluntarily resigned, or was forced out by impeachment or the 25th Amendment.
How does the military become involved in this scenario?