Nobody has produced the covid molecule for examination. Period. Only what has been produced in the human bodies through vaccine. A doctor in Idaho can only find antibodies in vaxxed people.
My understanding is that with all we know about the virus now, it has so many things about that we're not known in 2019 that you simply couldn't take a virus so some CRISPR stuff and get COVID.
There are components of HIV stitched into COViD too and they are in a configuration where they are effective. This was discovered early on by Indian researchers. They called it "fortuitious" that the HIV protein sections were in a working configuration. This was tongue in cheek, they had discovered that features of HiV had been added to this bioweapon.
I remember this being a giant concern early on. In fact, I think a Noble Prize winner said this was a smoking gun, but then he walked it back when other scientists pointed that coronviruses have furin cleavage sites and this does happen in nature.
And since then as more and more scientists studied SARSCOV2 we found an FCS by itself it not enough to infect humans.
Scientists call the ability to infect and cause disease "pathogenesis."
We now know that multiple elements are needed.
An FCS (this was known before 2019)
The length of the loops of the spike on the FCS (NOT known in 2019 and I believe unique to SARS-COV-2.)
Another feature upstream and separate from the FCS that affects glycosylation which how carbohydrates bond to proteins (NOT known in 2019.)
This study demonstrates that in addition to the furin cleavage site (FCS), both the length/composition of the exterior loop and glycosylation of the QTQTN motif are necessary for efficient SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Disruption of any of these three elements reduces SARS-CoV-2 replication, alters entry pathway utilization, and attenuates in vivo disease. Together, the work highlights the complexity of spike activation beyond just the presence of an FCS
There is no spike protein, because there is no virus.
This is like debating how long the horn is on a unicorn. First, you have to prove that a unicorn even exists.
Same with any virus.
No lab ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has any sample of SARS-CoV-2 ... because it does not exist.
Virology turns out to be a scam fake science.
ALL virologists who think they are studying a virus use the same process to do so.
That process CREATES "artifacts" (pieces of material/debris).
An electron microscope is the ONLY type of microscope used to study this.
No human can SEE DIRECTLY anything in/from an electron microscope.
They use a process to produce photos from the electron microscope.
Those photos are what virologists use to claim to "see" this or that.
But what they are actually looking at in those photos is the debris from the PROCESS that was used to end up with those photos.
It is called the "cytopathic effect." It is the end result of this process, which is a FRAUDULENT process.
ALL the so-called "research" that people point to to "prove" this or that about the genome, or the spike protein, or anything else related to the "virus" ... is done IN SILICO -- which means a computer program, and NOT a real world test lab with a real virus sample, because ...
NO LABORATORY IN THE WORLD HAS ANY SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2.
Anybody can create a computer program, and can create it to arrive at per-determined conclusions if they want, and they can run all sorts of simulations.
That MIGHT, in some cases, provide a good starting point for real research, but at some point, they have to take it into the real world (a lab) and test something REAL that exists in reality, and not just a theoretical computer model.
NOBODY HAS EVER TESTED SARS-CoV-2 in the REAL world, because NOBODY HAS A SAMPLE OF IT.
End of debate.
All these lab leak stories are limited hangouts to divert from the truth.
What's the best evidence SARS-COV-2 was man made?
The genetic sequence was patented ----- way before the pandemic or mRNA.
Nobody has produced the covid molecule for examination. Period. Only what has been produced in the human bodies through vaccine. A doctor in Idaho can only find antibodies in vaxxed people.
IIRC they did Massively Parallel Sequencing
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7310664/
IIRC this can give you identifiable markers.
You might be referring to what user lostmyeffingpassword referred to
Please see his comment and my reply
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AKFgLqYG/x/c/4ZJ1aa7GiIy
Is this what you meant?
The furin cleavage site.
In silico = computer simulation.
Never done with a real SARS-CoV-2 virus, because NOBODY has a sample of that virus.
No lab anywhere in the world.
Therefore, ALL the supposed "studies" have been done "in silico," which means via computer simulation, not in the real world.
We now know that is not enough.
Please see my answer here
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AKFgLqYG/x/c/4ZJ1aep1sud
Here is the patent, it was made in Pirbright in the UK. Filed in 2015 and accepted in 2018.
https://app.filen.io/#/d/9d6638a3-e1b8-4df4-b18a-649d6aec50f9%23c8jp22cWueo36RiS9B8S1EehozVMx8U1
This is not the virus that causes COVID-19. This is not SARS-COV-2.
This not a bat virus like SARS-COV-2.
This is a bird flu.
It's a "strain of avian coronavirus previously known as infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is the only coronavirus that infects chickens."
"IBV belongs to the Coronaviridae family, genus Gammacoronavirus "
SARS-COV-2 is not a gammacoronavirus. It is a betacoronavirus
Evidence of CRISPR manipulation
What's the evidence?
My understanding is that with all we know about the virus now, it has so many things about that we're not known in 2019 that you simply couldn't take a virus so some CRISPR stuff and get COVID.
I'd have to look it up. but I believe there are artefacts in the genetic code if it has been manipulated by CRISPR and they are present in COVID
Here is an article giving the principle of CRISPR and bioweapons anyway:
https://www.americansecurityproject.org/crispr-is-making-bioweapons-more-accessible/
There are components of HIV stitched into COViD too and they are in a configuration where they are effective. This was discovered early on by Indian researchers. They called it "fortuitious" that the HIV protein sections were in a working configuration. This was tongue in cheek, they had discovered that features of HiV had been added to this bioweapon.
edit. here we are: https://sundayguardianlive.com/news/fauci-described-indian-research-man-made-covid-outlandish
It's so damning, Fauci had to address it.
Please stop with your "concerns". I think you know this stuff already.
The insertion of a furin cleavage site at the S1 S2 junction.
This was done in a computer simulation, right?
Never done with any actual virus, because NOBODY has a sample of the actual virus.
I remember this being a giant concern early on. In fact, I think a Noble Prize winner said this was a smoking gun, but then he walked it back when other scientists pointed that coronviruses have furin cleavage sites and this does happen in nature.
And since then as more and more scientists studied SARSCOV2 we found an FCS by itself it not enough to infect humans.
Scientists call the ability to infect and cause disease "pathogenesis."
We now know that multiple elements are needed.
An FCS (this was known before 2019)
The length of the loops of the spike on the FCS (NOT known in 2019 and I believe unique to SARS-COV-2.)
Another feature upstream and separate from the FCS that affects glycosylation which how carbohydrates bond to proteins (NOT known in 2019.)
https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2205690119
Essentially this means putting a FCS into another virus is not enough
There is no spike protein, because there is no virus.
This is like debating how long the horn is on a unicorn. First, you have to prove that a unicorn even exists.
Same with any virus.
No lab ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has any sample of SARS-CoV-2 ... because it does not exist.
Virology turns out to be a scam fake science.
ALL virologists who think they are studying a virus use the same process to do so.
That process CREATES "artifacts" (pieces of material/debris).
An electron microscope is the ONLY type of microscope used to study this.
No human can SEE DIRECTLY anything in/from an electron microscope.
They use a process to produce photos from the electron microscope.
Those photos are what virologists use to claim to "see" this or that.
But what they are actually looking at in those photos is the debris from the PROCESS that was used to end up with those photos.
It is called the "cytopathic effect." It is the end result of this process, which is a FRAUDULENT process.
ALL the so-called "research" that people point to to "prove" this or that about the genome, or the spike protein, or anything else related to the "virus" ... is done IN SILICO -- which means a computer program, and NOT a real world test lab with a real virus sample, because ...
NO LABORATORY IN THE WORLD HAS ANY SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2.
Anybody can create a computer program, and can create it to arrive at per-determined conclusions if they want, and they can run all sorts of simulations.
That MIGHT, in some cases, provide a good starting point for real research, but at some point, they have to take it into the real world (a lab) and test something REAL that exists in reality, and not just a theoretical computer model.
NOBODY HAS EVER TESTED SARS-CoV-2 in the REAL world, because NOBODY HAS A SAMPLE OF IT.
End of debate.
All these lab leak stories are limited hangouts to divert from the truth.
I like this. Swing for the fences