Wait, why are we repairing private infrastructure? Are we rebuilding private homes too? If someone wants to live in a place that requires them to build a bridge, that's fine, but that is on them.
Completely agree, but maybe Trump has the evidence that the event was caused / engineered by the previous administration and if that was not done maybe it would not have been as great of a flood event that resulted in such extensive damage?
Lots of homes on private roads with bridges built long ago and no road maintainance agreements or reserves/insurance on bridges and road damage beyond regular stuff
Again, that is their choice. Just because people don't have a plan or live beyond their means doesn't mean we should just bail them out. That's how we end up with the welfare state and social security. It is all bad.
Wait, why are we repairing private infrastructure? Are we rebuilding private homes too? If someone wants to live in a place that requires them to build a bridge, that's fine, but that is on them.
Completely agree, but maybe Trump has the evidence that the event was caused / engineered by the previous administration and if that was not done maybe it would not have been as great of a flood event that resulted in such extensive damage?
Maybe, but if that was the case, then I would think the government has an obligation to rebuild their homes as well.
Lots of homes on private roads with bridges built long ago and no road maintainance agreements or reserves/insurance on bridges and road damage beyond regular stuff
Again, that is their choice. Just because people don't have a plan or live beyond their means doesn't mean we should just bail them out. That's how we end up with the welfare state and social security. It is all bad.
and seized gold will be distributed to good people!