What I learnt is USA didn't fuck up by inviting Russia, they did it ON PURPOSE TO ALWAYS HAVE RUSSIA AS ENEMY. Every hero needs an enemy, so Russia became the scapegoat. THEY NEVER WANTED WORLD PEACE - No money in that, and no reasons or coverups for money laundry without Wars.
They planned the Ukraine Russia War since WW2 I believe. They wanted RUSSIA UKRAINE to become WW3 but that plan failed, thanks to Q, White Hats, President Trump and their hard work, courage, and perseverance, and under God's protection.
Yup. They violated NATO's terms and have been poking the bear almost since Day 1. Fortunately, Russia didn't retaliate as western warmongers expected it to.
NATO was incorporated to defend against the USSR. I question why NATO wasn't dissolved when the USSR disintegrated - grift?, greed? MIC?
Soviet premier Joseph Stalin chose to test Western resolve by implementing a blockade against West Berlin, which was then under joint U.S., British, and French control but surrounded by Soviet-controlled East Germany. This Berlin Crisis brought the United States and the Soviet Union to the brink of conflict, although a massive airlift to resupply the city for the duration of the blockade helped to prevent an outright confrontation. .
The only reason to add Ukraine to NATO was to incite Russia to war. It would be the same if China put military assets in Alberta or Iran in Coahuila, Mexico. The USA would be pissed.
Well, to be honest, NATO was formed to protect European nations from the Soviet Union after WWII. So under its original mission, that would have been stupid.
This was not an oopsie, hindsight is 20/20 kind of thing. It was deliberate in order to bring about the exact opposite outcomes this post mentions. There's more profit for the cabal in conflict than in peace.
Putin ASKED to join NATO when Clinton was president and Clinton told him no. That has NEVER made sense to me unless it was merely keeping a locked in enemy
ChatGPT continues "In hindsight, trying harder to integrate Russia in the 2000s might have been worth the risk—because the alternative (Cold War 2.0, Ukraine war, NATO-Russia hostility) has been disastrous."
What I learnt is USA didn't fuck up by inviting Russia, they did it ON PURPOSE TO ALWAYS HAVE RUSSIA AS ENEMY. Every hero needs an enemy, so Russia became the scapegoat. THEY NEVER WANTED WORLD PEACE - No money in that, and no reasons or coverups for money laundry without Wars.
They planned the Ukraine Russia War since WW2 I believe. They wanted RUSSIA UKRAINE to become WW3 but that plan failed, thanks to Q, White Hats, President Trump and their hard work, courage, and perseverance, and under God's protection.
Yup. They violated NATO's terms and have been poking the bear almost since Day 1. Fortunately, Russia didn't retaliate as western warmongers expected it to.
Yes.
NATO was incorporated to defend against the USSR. I question why NATO wasn't dissolved when the USSR disintegrated - grift?, greed? MIC?
The only reason to add Ukraine to NATO was to incite Russia to war. It would be the same if China put military assets in Alberta or Iran in Coahuila, Mexico. The USA would be pissed.
Well, to be honest, NATO was formed to protect European nations from the Soviet Union after WWII. So under its original mission, that would have been stupid.
After the Communist Block and USSR disintegrated, NATO should have celebrated that it worked itself out of a job!
^^^ EXACTLY ^^^
The Soviet Union is gone ----- so should NATO go.
No, when the Soviet Union fell, NATO should have been abandoned, just like its sister organization, SEATO in the Pacific.
What would be NATOs mission?
Exactly. See my comment elsewhere in this thread.
This was not an oopsie, hindsight is 20/20 kind of thing. It was deliberate in order to bring about the exact opposite outcomes this post mentions. There's more profit for the cabal in conflict than in peace.
We have no need for nato.
Fuk them,we should withdraw.
Putin ASKED to join NATO when Clinton was president and Clinton told him no. That has NEVER made sense to me unless it was merely keeping a locked in enemy
There is no money in this solution.
NATO way past its sell-by date.....
But maybe if we're nice, Russia will let us join BRICS.
We have No-Name to thank for that, neocon bastard
ChatGPT continues "In hindsight, trying harder to integrate Russia in the 2000s might have been worth the risk—because the alternative (Cold War 2.0, Ukraine war, NATO-Russia hostility) has been disastrous."