The cabal - less like a snake, more like a hydra with a 'woman' steering it. Mystery Babylon
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
This is why it's futile to find 'the head of the snake', because there are multiple heads. What you need to do is find the woman.
Inspired by https://greatawakening.win/p/19Adl7BWRm/zelensky-is-now-meeting-with-t/
A couple things I shall submit for your consideration:
https://www.endtime.com/mystery-babylon-who-is-it/
https://www.chick.com/Information/article?id=Who-Is-The-Woman-Who-Rides-The-Beast-In-Revelation-17
Many will indeed ask, "but what about the Jews?!", to which I say time will tell. Consider the historical relationship between the Israelites (not limited to the tribe of Judah) and the dominant super-states of the times. Ancient Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome...were they ever running the show? Or were they always the subjects of the state? Many claim the Jews killed Christ, but who really killed him? The same entity that then turned on those Jews and destroyed the temple some 30 years later, that's who. "But they control the Vatican bank!" Do they really? Or have they merely been hired to manage it? Are they truly the global controllers, or are they just the front-facing employees of a much larger system? Israel has only been a state for ~80 years yet I'm supposed to believe that some loose group of Jews have been ruining the earth for the last 2,000 years without a headquarters or any real structure? Yet the Catholic church has been around almost that entire time, pulling global strings subtly and overtly "in the name of God!"
I don't doubt that the Messiah-rejecting Jews are now tools in satan's hands, but there is absolutely no way in hell they are the top dogs. They don't have the numbers or the institution to pull that off for that long and as far as I know, they haven't been in any sort of powerful position until the 1800s bankers, and that limited to a few select families. I maintain that those families were, are, and will not be allowed to advance beyond, hired hands and proxies.
The cabal is outlined in the Bible. All you have to do is fill in the colors.
Part 2
The Scythians received tribute from all of those groups. I'm not sure if they took tribute from all of those groups for all of that time (I don't think they did), but they are a component of this that is hidden from history. The Scythians are perhaps better known as the Tartarians (so named in 1200ish by Genghis Khan, the leader of the Scythians at the time). Scythia is also called Magog. The leader of the Mogogians/Scythians was Gog at the time (I think).
The Scythians ruled the world (Europe and Asia at least) for the better part of 3,000 - 5,000 years (as Tribute). When the other powers got uppity, and didn't pay their taxes (tribute), the Scythians put them in their place; see Genghis Khan as one example of the workings of the Scythian's tax collection system (even worse than the IRS). See Attila the Hun for another, e.g..
I'm not saying the Scythians are "the head of the snake," nor did the Scythians control the entirety of Europe/Asia for the whole time (though they did at some times), but like I said, the Scythians, and especially the Royal Scythians, are a very important component of this that is completely erased from history.
Another tidbit: all the current ruling families of Europe/Northern Asia are explicitly stated descendants of the Royal Scythians; a subgroup of Caucasians (where the word comes from) noted throughout history with blonde/red hair and blue/green eyes. The name for this genetic group of Royal Scythians is the Aryan Race (I shit you not).
Israel has only been a state for a little while, but the people who created that "new" state are the same group of people who have controlled all of the Western World for all that time. They have been controlling all of the world through economics and belief. They have been the power behind the throne for at least two millennia. The "State of Israel" is not the power. It's the group (people) that controls that power, associated with Israel, and they've been around for a VERY long time.
It's very important to remember though, it's not "the Jews." It is the TOP LEVEL of the Jews. Just like it isn't the "Americans," it's Rockefeller et al who sit at the TOP LEVEL of America (through economic control, and propaganda/psyops). The controlling group is not "The Jews," it's what I call, the Jewish Trust.
That group does indeed, without doubt (in my mind) control everything. EVERYTHING. They controlled Rome from the early days. They controlled the Church (indeed they created the FORMAL SYSTEM ) from the very beginning of the Church at 325 AD). They controlled all of the Kings and Queens of all of Europe from the fall of Rome (eastern Roman Empire). All of those Kings of Europe were all explicitly stated at descendants of the Royal Scythians, allowed to be in power by the Roman Church, and controlled all of Europe and Asia ultimately by The Jewish Trust, both through economic control and by their belief systems.
After the "fall of Rome" (a gross misnomer, but I'll go with it) they immediately set up shop in Venice. From Venice, the Jewish Trust ruled the world (though they are a distributed network).
That doesn't mean there isn't another, even powerful, and more insidious power, one that controls the Jewish Trust. On the contrary, I think there is. Who is that power? You don't want me to tell you who I think it is. The cognitive dissonance is too great.
Pfff, you might as well tell me. I'm too far gone already 😁
Black Nobility? Descendants of the Roman senators regrouping and forming the Venician banking systems? This was a great post https://greatawakening.win/p/1995Lj03kO/does-the-vatican-own-blackrock--/c/
I promise you, you are not that far gone. Not enough that the cognitive dissonance won't harm you. And if you would have no problem with it, others would. It's too much. The programming is too powerful, too pervasive.
Either I would just say it ("It's ____"), in which case people would hate me, and everything I say afterwards will be ignored, or I give all the evidence for it, and make a convincing argument, and THEN people will hate me, or it will hurt them. Seriously, some programming is just too powerful. They're only a few who could see that evidence, and they already know or suspect.
DM me
I think you should tell. You went too far to stop now.
This is wrong. Tartarians and Mongolians are descendants of Scythians. A long time ago some tribal asians interbred with Aryans and their descendats became the Tartarians and Mongolians.
Scythians were white and one of the original Indo-Europeans (Aryans, Yamnaya, or whatever you want to call them) that went out and conquered the world.
Scythians were free horse nomads who the Romans wrote were older than the Egyptian civilization. Many of us on this board unknowingly are direct descendants of Scythians, they're genes have since spread out all over from Ireland to the other end of Asia and beyond.
They did not have a writing system or settle in cities. What kept them in tact and strong was they had a culture of not accepting luxuries, only living with what was needed. They created a strong culture that lasted for thousands of years, not like the pitiful shit you see today in Europe.
I would not go to say they ruled anywhere since they were always on the move but they conquered what they wanted when they wanted. Greeks and Romans had quite a reverence for them. Some Greek men coming of age would join them in their travels for a time. Their horse archers were second to none, they were entwined with the horse, and they were very difficult to defeat.
Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 2 - The Scythians and Their Kin | Asha Logos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1OVwuCdkK4
Implying Scythians are the Jews or the ones hiding in the shadows is disgraceful.
I often link Asha Logos as a starting point for people interested in this investigation. The problem is, Asha Logos gets a lot of things wrong. They miss too much of the evidence. Most importantly, they know almost nothing about the Royal Scythians.
The primary way of hiding history has been through the creative use of separation. For example, all the pyramids or other megalithic architecture are all virtually identical. They have similar architectural styles, the same dimensions, the same glyphs, same pictures or pictograms; they are written in stone telling the same stories, etc. and yet they are all proclaimed by official history to be completely different, having nothing to do with each other. History won't even consider that they are connected, because it doesn't comply with "the story."
The same thing is done through cultures.
The Romans, for example, were multicultural. ALL Empires have cultural and genetic diversity. Scythia was an Empire. Of course they had genetic and cultural diversity. The Roman Empire was a dot, a spec, compared to the Scythian Empire, both by landmass and population. Both China and India were tributaries of Scythia for example, at least for some of the time (maybe most of the time). The Scythian Empire was MASSIVE, and existed for millennia. Why do you think that all these smaller areas were fundamentally separated when there is so much evidence, including explicit statements to the contrary? Specifically, there are numerous statements that state that Mongolia was all part of the same Scythian Empire.
History uses the facts of their differences of those areas, or "kingdoms" (Khanates), to provide evidence of their separation, ignoring the Empire that ruled over them (an Empire rules over a Kingdom; Emperor > King). History has lost an essential component of the "Empire" part of that region. The most important piece of that history, and the piece that links it all together and makes it an Empire, is their system of government, ruled by the Royal Scythians; a single ruling family, noted by their Blue/Green eyes, and Blond/Red hair (and other genetic components). Genghis Khan for example, had green eyes and red hair. Reading the stuff from really old (13th to 18th centuries) states that the reason Genghis Khan was able to rule was because of his red hair and green eyes. It was essential to have those genetic markers for people to accept them. Indeed, there is a fair bit of evidence that suggests that Genghis Khan wasn’t even of mixed race, but was pure Caucasian.
To think that the Tartarians were genetically Mongolians exclusively is ludicrous. Of course some of them were. Genghis Khan may have been. But the EMPIRE was much bigger than Mongolia. Their ruling class was almost certainly not Mongolian. The Kingdom of Mongolia may have been primarily of the genetic class as we think of them. It may be that the ruling family may have been mixed. But the Rulers of the Mongolian Khanate were of the same family as ruled all the other Khanates, because they had to be. It was the only way they could possibly rule.
Importantly (incredibly importantly) they are the same family that rules Europe today through the Merovingians (the Merovingian was given the right to rule by the Church because he stated he was a Royal Scythian). Primogeniture, as it is traditional in Europe now, wasn’t a thing in Scythia according to my research. On the contrary, the Emperor (or even a King) was only allowed to lead if he or she was strong enough. It was both a meritocracy AND a nobility, all in the same family.
Book after book about the Kingdom of Mongolia (a part of the Empire), suggest that Genghis, and his entire family, were part of these Royal Scythians, and the only way that Genghis could possibly claim leadership was because he had both the genetic proof and the merit. Of course you have to read the books written before the late 19th century to learn anything about this, right about the time that Rockefeller/Rothschild were rewriting history.
SOME Of the Scythians were nomadic. But they had cities, roads, infrastructure, trading networks, etc. They built the entire Silk Road and Amber Road ffs. As an example of a city, Samarkand is one of theirs, built at least 1000 BC, but they had numerous cities and towns. The Scythians are attributed with inventing chariots, the wheel, gunpowder, iron (they started the iron age), and several other things I don’t remember off the top of my head, but were huge with regards to technology. The idea that that huge Empire didn't have infrastructure is beyond ludicrous. Did they create the smithies to invent steel while on horse back? Their "nomadic" culture was because it made them so effective warriors, both internally and externally, and likely because of their origins. But to think that in their expansion that they didn't expand culturally or in infrastructure is at odds with the evidence. Some part of that culture was as mobile cavalry and the camp followers and mobile housing to support them. They won battle after battle because they could move so quickly. That was a component of life for sure for some, but that doesn't mean it was their only component, nor does it mean that everyone was a nomad, any more than everyone in America is an infantry.
The Scythians were huge in their technical impact, and get barely a whisper in official history. Most people don’t even know the name “Scythia,” much less that they are the Tartarians or the Khazarians. Remember, the Scythian Empire was multicultural. Almost all of that history is just gone. You have to dig deep to find it, but it’s there.
Bullshit. They have been rewritten out of history. Samarkand for example, has a ton of writing. There is a ton of writing about Scythia. The nomadic section of Scythia (probably mostly the warrior caste) probably didn’t do much writing, but all the border towns (trading hubs on the Black Sea e.g.) almost certainly had a ton of writing. Maybe they didn't write a lot about their internal history as an Empire, or maybe it was destroyed or stolen. Who knows. But they weren't incapable of writing.
The Scythians ruled most of the world for three to five millennia. They had many components to their Empire. If you separate out parts of it in our "official history," then you only hear a part of it, and lose the whole picture to "history." You have to dig to see more. When you do, that “more” is amazing.
Haha, what? They were the richest Empire that ever existed. They took tribute from everyone. Those “nomads” had gold horse bridles, and bronze boarding. Their HORSES were made of gold. The Tartarians were called the Golden Horde ffs, because of all their gold and bronze armor. They were rich as fuck. My god, 20th century (Rockefeller) history has been so convoluted. Read a book written prior to the mid 19th century. Please.
I’m not just saying these things, speaking out of my ass. I’ve written hundreds of pages on this topic, with hundreds of references; archeological, genetic, historical account, personal account, etc., etc. I don't fuck around. I intend to include that writing as part of my larger report. I hope I include it soon.
First, I barely mentioned the link to the Scythians (here). I’ve barely even begun to talk about what their connections are, even though there are many. Second, The truth is whatever it is. The truth is WHATEVER it is. Third, the Scythians are the Khazarians, and the Khazarians are intimately connected to the Jews (specifically a group of higher up Jews married into the Royal Scythians of Khazar in the 7th century AD). The only question is (not really a question, but takes a bit to show), are the Khazarians the Ashkenazim?
Again, the truth is whatever it is. There are some very interesting connections there. To suggest that talking about those connections is "disgraceful" is itself disgraceful. We mustn’t be afraid to look where the evidence leads, no matter where that is.
Relevant
https://communities.win/c/Funny/p/19AdzEZ4LZ/conspiracies-/c
Also you're mixing false info with real info together. Its not worth arguing with this this kind of retardation.
Jews are the way jews are not because of religious or anti-religious reasons. Its because they are born weak men with low self-esteem. Others are born with a much more majestic nature but not a jew at heart. These are people whose identity revolves around screaming theyre being conquered, playing the victim while turning on you, twisting words and stories so you dont know what to believe anymore. If these were rightful rulers and conquers, they would be more open, more direct, show more power. But this is not the jewish way.
Incidentally women also use a similar strategy with men whether consciously or subconscioisly. It is neither good nor bad, it is the nature of women. The nature of men though is different and adopting this strategy is unnatural for men, it breeds weakness and death.
I strongly suspect you are in fact a jew.
A Scythian that was nomadic and joins a city is no longer a Scythian. The lifestyle that tempers the genes of his and his descendants changes completely. It just takes a few generations of living in a city and his history, culture, and genes are so completely different. While his ancestors hunted proudly for their food and ruled the lands they roamed, he is now basically an office worker or begger scounging for measly earnings to buy bread and shelter. If you don't understand this then you are hopeless. If you do understand this then you are twisting history with lies.
I keep it simple; there are those who follow nd are influenced by the true God, the Father of Jesus Christ and those who follow God's adversary the Devil and who reject God's Son Jesus Christ. The name of those false gods vary from.place to place and through time. But the influence doesn't. Same devil. SAME GOD and Father of THE Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Every man and woman gets to choose. The choices made are obvious to those with eyes to see.
Yeah. This is how there can be genuine believers in Christ within the Catholic, Orthodox, and all the other sects that were born of them and why God said "come out of her, my people..." I used to not realize that fact and it caused me to be very harsh and incorrect in my approach, but God had mercy on me and set me straight!
I often wondered how the USA would sever ties with the final empire. We are witnessing that in the news today!
Revelations 7:9
This calls for a mind with wisdom: the seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman is seated;
Seven mountains == Seven hills of Rome
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_hills_of_Rome
Read the whole chapter for full context.
I wish people would stop talking about the "catholic church." There is such a thing, because catholic means universal. There has been a catholic and apostolic church since the time of Jesus. It still exists. It is the Orthodox church. The Roman Catholic Church was the creation that appeared after the schism of 1054. So, the Roman Catholic Church is about 1000 years younger than Orthodoxy. The pope is actually the Bishop of Rome, one among hundreds of other Orthdox bishops. He was given a higher degree of importance since that Bishopric was very old, as was the Bishopric of Jerusalem and a couple of others. No bishop is any higher than any other Bishop, but there were the five Patriarchs from just about that same time. THEY are the highest clergy. Not any bishop.
Universal church is a claim they make. But then they believe they are the embodiment. My Bible calls it the Church of Christ. The Body of Christ, the Church of Grace, and by other descriptions. It's never been an ecclesiastical body run by secular minds. And God definitely doesn't care about traditions that men imposed on His people.
The EO came out of the RCC, not the other way around. Before the schism they were one, yes; however Rome was spread too thin to be able to stay connected with the east and there arose disputes about some dogmas that led to them breaking off. If you examine both church's dogmas, you will find them to be quite similar. The Bible is clear---the final beast is Rome, and so its final iteration is also a Roman institution, not a Russian one.
It is going to take Jesus Himself to slay that beast, and one day, He will!