Exactly! The whole lab origins disclosure is a limited hangout. Let out some truth -- the virus wasn't natural -- in order to keep a much more important secret -- viruses don't exist. The latter can't be let out, because it is the biggest weapon of fear generation and control in ruler wanna be's toolbox.
You're either referring to what may be called viruses but they are phages. Or you're referring to CPEs in cell cultures, which are claimed to be viruses, but are material being ejected from a dying cell. In neither case is what's depicted a virus.
There is a conceptual problem here. On the one hand, you claim there are no such things as a virus. On the other hand, you seem to have very specific criteria for what is not a virus. How can you have exclusion criteria for something that does not exist? Not a persuasive epistemological position.
You keep saying it, I’ll keep upvoting. The scammers don’t care where you think it comes from as long as you think it is real.
Ha ha, so true!
Exactly! The whole lab origins disclosure is a limited hangout. Let out some truth -- the virus wasn't natural -- in order to keep a much more important secret -- viruses don't exist. The latter can't be let out, because it is the biggest weapon of fear generation and control in ruler wanna be's toolbox.
Funny that we have a profusion of scanning electron microscope photographs of viruses. "Don't regard that photo of a zebra. There are no zebras!"
You're either referring to what may be called viruses but they are phages. Or you're referring to CPEs in cell cultures, which are claimed to be viruses, but are material being ejected from a dying cell. In neither case is what's depicted a virus.
There is a conceptual problem here. On the one hand, you claim there are no such things as a virus. On the other hand, you seem to have very specific criteria for what is not a virus. How can you have exclusion criteria for something that does not exist? Not a persuasive epistemological position.