Seriously, I need some help understanding the idea behind what people are calling comms.
Because, to me, comms are supposed to be clear messages. As in "This is what I'm trying to communicate to you." They have a purpose. Like "here is what it means" and "here is what you do with it".
That would suggest that the message that is being communicated is clear.
What I see being called comms, to me, just appears like some loose association.
What is the purpose of this comm here? Who is it for? If it's for us, what exactly are we supposed to do with it?
Because this type of thing strikes me more as just some passtime or game where people just come up with some association to the "comm" and build a story around it.
If that's not what this is, then what are we supposed to do with this comm? What purpose does it serve, practically speaking?
Around here, a Rorschach Blot is considered a "comm." You get to read into it whatever you most want to see. You are right to be skeptical. The Shannon Criterion for message communication is that it reduces uncertainty. It totally fails with all these "comms." So, the present purpose is bias confirmation. And if you don't quite see it, the chorus derides or down-votes you to enforce group conformity.
Stick around and watch. Rorschach blots abound. And everybody praises the Emperor's clothes. If something was "obvious" it wouldn't be "missing." I don't buy the bullshit. It is a group head-fake because the proponents are on a bias confirmation high. Or, as I like to put it, hopium and dopium are very close together.
The pity is that it obscures real items of interest by the confusion and finger-pointing. More hard-headedness and less credulity would clear the air.
Steganography is comms, but it's not clear communication. It is made up of secret, hidden, or coded messages intended for those with the knowledge to recognize and interpret them. That's what many Q comms have been. Trump regularly communicates this way.
Through Q comms, known Luciferian symbolism, the Podesta art collection, victim reports, incredible research by the anons over the years, and more, we have learned of the rape, torture, trafficking, and murder and cannibalism of children by very powerful, connected Luciferian cult sickos. We have learned of this cult's love of hiding in plain sight. Some of them are so beloved and admired that no one would ever believe they engage in such horrors.
We have heard the rumors that horrific crimes go on in very prominent places. We can observe Trump's very serious tone in this interview, note his personal takeover of the Kennedy Center (an odd choice for a president with seemingly much bigger problems), and his pointed references to unused underground rooms and unusual hidden entrances to them.
Those familiar with similar past comms can reasonably believe he might have been conveying that the Kennedy Center has been the site of atrocities and that he will be correcting that. Is that a correct interpretation? Time will tell.
You're very welcome. It's all in the finger pointing and head nodding. When timed correctly, it's like putting on glasses for the very first time for a half blind person.
Ok. What's the comm, then?
Seriously, I need some help understanding the idea behind what people are calling comms.
Because, to me, comms are supposed to be clear messages. As in "This is what I'm trying to communicate to you." They have a purpose. Like "here is what it means" and "here is what you do with it".
That would suggest that the message that is being communicated is clear.
What I see being called comms, to me, just appears like some loose association.
What is the purpose of this comm here? Who is it for? If it's for us, what exactly are we supposed to do with it?
Because this type of thing strikes me more as just some passtime or game where people just come up with some association to the "comm" and build a story around it.
If that's not what this is, then what are we supposed to do with this comm? What purpose does it serve, practically speaking?
Around here, a Rorschach Blot is considered a "comm." You get to read into it whatever you most want to see. You are right to be skeptical. The Shannon Criterion for message communication is that it reduces uncertainty. It totally fails with all these "comms." So, the present purpose is bias confirmation. And if you don't quite see it, the chorus derides or down-votes you to enforce group conformity.
Sometimes I feel like I'm missing some glaringly obvious thing everyone else claims to be seeing so clearly.
It's so frustrating.
Stick around and watch. Rorschach blots abound. And everybody praises the Emperor's clothes. If something was "obvious" it wouldn't be "missing." I don't buy the bullshit. It is a group head-fake because the proponents are on a bias confirmation high. Or, as I like to put it, hopium and dopium are very close together.
The pity is that it obscures real items of interest by the confusion and finger-pointing. More hard-headedness and less credulity would clear the air.
Thanks for your take on it. I know how hard it is to go against group think.
Steganography is comms, but it's not clear communication. It is made up of secret, hidden, or coded messages intended for those with the knowledge to recognize and interpret them. That's what many Q comms have been. Trump regularly communicates this way.
Through Q comms, known Luciferian symbolism, the Podesta art collection, victim reports, incredible research by the anons over the years, and more, we have learned of the rape, torture, trafficking, and murder and cannibalism of children by very powerful, connected Luciferian cult sickos. We have learned of this cult's love of hiding in plain sight. Some of them are so beloved and admired that no one would ever believe they engage in such horrors.
We have heard the rumors that horrific crimes go on in very prominent places. We can observe Trump's very serious tone in this interview, note his personal takeover of the Kennedy Center (an odd choice for a president with seemingly much bigger problems), and his pointed references to unused underground rooms and unusual hidden entrances to them.
Those familiar with similar past comms can reasonably believe he might have been conveying that the Kennedy Center has been the site of atrocities and that he will be correcting that. Is that a correct interpretation? Time will tell.
Sometimes it takes time to see it.
u/#silvia u/#mikeyep
Right. That's very helpful. Thanks.
You're very welcome. It's all in the finger pointing and head nodding. When timed correctly, it's like putting on glasses for the very first time for a half blind person.
Oh, I missed the timing completely! That brings it all together!