sauce: In what document and page number is this mentioned?
Although, I concur with the idea, and based on the idea that man is the embodiment of rights, the only person capable of performing acts at rights, the issue is that these meme's are floating about, without substantiation.
I don't have that answer, however I did discuss it with my lawyer who was aware of it. He said the corruption is so bad that they don't care and will jail you anyway. Shocker.
Yes, as said: it is a logical principle. But claiming someone said something based on a meme is in my view rather flimsy, would you agree?
Because, indeed, if it has substance, than it would support something else: Total tax protest based in international law. It means: no mo money ....
In the Netherlands people have sent about 10.000 letters to the tax office, considering suspending any cooperation. I would bet, if this can be pulled off in effective deeds, than change will roll in harder.
That said, I think that many people still try to save what they think they have. ....
It was not a real, honest set of trials. It was a kangaroo court.
There were 3 countries acting as judges: USA, UK, USSR.
Most of the court rules were ultimately determined to be consistent with USSR rules.
Anything based on English common law would have meant they couldn't just do whatever they wanted, so they went with the nasty USSR rules for the kangaroo court.
There was no need for ANY EVIDENCE to be presented in order to find someone guilty of a crime.
Torture to obtain a confession was considered acceptable and valid testimony.
In this meme (I don't know if it is real or fake), notice it is saying that "international law" supercedes ANY government's laws. That is one world government stuff, and should be absolutely REJECTED.
However ...
It is interesting to note that it says that a citizen is prohibited from engaging in combat. It says "on the part of the aggressor," but who "the aggressor" is, is in the eye of the beholder. The greater principle is that combat should be engaged in by military, and not citizens ambushing military.
I'm not necessarily saying I agree with that, but it is what the meme is saying.
This puts certain aspects of history into a different (non-mainstream) view.
For example, in WW2, Germany is always considered the villain for "invading" Belgium and the Netherlands -- cuz muh desire to "take over the world."
Well, yes they did, but that is not the full story.
What is ALWAYS left out of that discussion is the fact that Belgium and Netherlands were publicly declared to be neutral in the war (would not get involved), but were secretly helping the UK by allowing them to stash weapons in Belgium/Netherlands for a suprise attack against Germany from a "neutral" territory.
Germany figured this out and beat them to the punch by invading.
While there, they followed the rules of war, but the locals (including many jews who had left Germany for these areas, including Anne Frank's father and their family) were civilians who were attacking Germans who were there to keep the peace (they were not at war with these countries, but were occupying to prevent UK/France from invading Germany).
The local citizens who ambushed the Germans were called "partisans."
Here is a short clip of former German soldiers speaking to a young Dutch woman who claimed her great-uncles had been abducted wrongfully by the Germans and never came back. They ask questions and find out that the men were partisans and that is why they were arrested (and probably sent to a prison for crimes). She had no idea, and doesn't seem to really understand it.
They also explain that they were at war because the USSR (led by jews) was planning on invading Germany and eventually all of Europe. That is what the war was about from THEIR perspective -- something nobody ever mentions.
The Nuremberg trials are only for jews. Notice how if you replace human in human rights with jew rights, it all makes sense as to why western countries vieniemently defend "isreal" but we do it to Arab countries or Asian countries and the world is rather silent. Just saying that the post world way 2 trials are nonsense. The thing is you can only be human if your a Jew and the rest of the world is just goyium or people less than human. Therefore human rights don't apply
so all anyone has ever needed to do is disagree with the functions of a government. Its genocide! Its a war crime. Its a crime against humanity. Thanks for the tip!
sauce: In what document and page number is this mentioned?
Although, I concur with the idea, and based on the idea that man is the embodiment of rights, the only person capable of performing acts at rights, the issue is that these meme's are floating about, without substantiation.
I don't have that answer, however I did discuss it with my lawyer who was aware of it. He said the corruption is so bad that they don't care and will jail you anyway. Shocker.
Yes, as said: it is a logical principle. But claiming someone said something based on a meme is in my view rather flimsy, would you agree?
Because, indeed, if it has substance, than it would support something else: Total tax protest based in international law. It means: no mo money ....
In the Netherlands people have sent about 10.000 letters to the tax office, considering suspending any cooperation. I would bet, if this can be pulled off in effective deeds, than change will roll in harder.
That said, I think that many people still try to save what they think they have. ....
Be careful with anything Nuremberg.
It was not a real, honest set of trials. It was a kangaroo court.
There were 3 countries acting as judges: USA, UK, USSR.
Most of the court rules were ultimately determined to be consistent with USSR rules.
Anything based on English common law would have meant they couldn't just do whatever they wanted, so they went with the nasty USSR rules for the kangaroo court.
There was no need for ANY EVIDENCE to be presented in order to find someone guilty of a crime.
Torture to obtain a confession was considered acceptable and valid testimony.
In this meme (I don't know if it is real or fake), notice it is saying that "international law" supercedes ANY government's laws. That is one world government stuff, and should be absolutely REJECTED.
However ...
It is interesting to note that it says that a citizen is prohibited from engaging in combat. It says "on the part of the aggressor," but who "the aggressor" is, is in the eye of the beholder. The greater principle is that combat should be engaged in by military, and not citizens ambushing military.
I'm not necessarily saying I agree with that, but it is what the meme is saying.
This puts certain aspects of history into a different (non-mainstream) view.
For example, in WW2, Germany is always considered the villain for "invading" Belgium and the Netherlands -- cuz muh desire to "take over the world."
Well, yes they did, but that is not the full story.
What is ALWAYS left out of that discussion is the fact that Belgium and Netherlands were publicly declared to be neutral in the war (would not get involved), but were secretly helping the UK by allowing them to stash weapons in Belgium/Netherlands for a suprise attack against Germany from a "neutral" territory.
Germany figured this out and beat them to the punch by invading.
While there, they followed the rules of war, but the locals (including many jews who had left Germany for these areas, including Anne Frank's father and their family) were civilians who were attacking Germans who were there to keep the peace (they were not at war with these countries, but were occupying to prevent UK/France from invading Germany).
The local citizens who ambushed the Germans were called "partisans."
Here is a short clip of former German soldiers speaking to a young Dutch woman who claimed her great-uncles had been abducted wrongfully by the Germans and never came back. They ask questions and find out that the men were partisans and that is why they were arrested (and probably sent to a prison for crimes). She had no idea, and doesn't seem to really understand it.
They also explain that they were at war because the USSR (led by jews) was planning on invading Germany and eventually all of Europe. That is what the war was about from THEIR perspective -- something nobody ever mentions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PJkNZ30WV0
Just about everything taught in our history books about this era is the opposite of the truth.
The Nuremberg trials are only for jews. Notice how if you replace human in human rights with jew rights, it all makes sense as to why western countries vieniemently defend "isreal" but we do it to Arab countries or Asian countries and the world is rather silent. Just saying that the post world way 2 trials are nonsense. The thing is you can only be human if your a Jew and the rest of the world is just goyium or people less than human. Therefore human rights don't apply
They consider themselves human and we are human "beings" something like, but ultimately less than, human.
If you look up in Black's Law Dictionary the term "human being," it says: see Monster.
How really affective was the Nuremberg trials?
Show trials is all
So I can just mail this in to the IRS this year instead of my usual tax form?
Let us know how it goes!
LOL.
As stated, not financial advice. Do you, boo. 🤣
Along with some news clippings of CIA coups, a picture of Zelensky and a few other spicy tidbits.
I wouldn't want to be accused of being a war criminal for funding these activities.
so all anyone has ever needed to do is disagree with the functions of a government. Its genocide! Its a war crime. Its a crime against humanity. Thanks for the tip!