So the annual flu season is really the annual "toxin season?"
I've tried to be open to the 'no viruses' idea, but I've seen SO MANY viruses blow through the family one after another based on how close they got to the originally infected person.
So the annual flu season is really the annual "toxin season?"
More accurately, probably the annual "detox" season.
But I can't PROVE it because guess what?
There is no MONEY in any narrative other than Big Pharma selling you drugs.
So, nobody will research other explanations.
Let me ask you a question: Do YOU actually KNOW how a virologist claims to PROVE that a virues exists, and that said virus is transmissable, and that said virus makes other people sick?
If you knew the answer(s), you would understand why the "no virus exists" people say what they do.
Maybe you would disagree with their reasoning or conclusion, but at least you would UNDERSTAND their position.
But you don't know, so you don't understand, as is the case for most people, even here on GAW.
That lack of understanding means you will not be able to figure how WHY the mainstream narrative is a lie -- and you won't know what to do about it.
Too many people, even here on GAW, are just too damn lazy.
"X-Ray Imaging of a Single Virus in 3D" Keith A. Nugent
ARC Centre of Excellence for Advanced Molecular Imaging, Department of Physics, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
March 2, 2015• Physics 8, 19
"An x-ray laser has imaged the three-dimensional structure of the mimivirus by combining hundreds of measurements on single virus particles.
"The authors used the giant mimivirus as their target—a simpler case than that of a small biomolecule. The mimivirus is one of the largest known viruses—about half a micrometer in diameter. First isolated in 1992 from amoebae growing in a water tower, it is thought to be the cause of certain forms of pneumonia."
Actually the vaccine only works pre-exposure or immediately post exposure if the virus hasn't reached the nervous system yet. The rabies vaccine stops it from ever infecting you - it does nothing visible because it stops you from ever getting it. No "lessens the symptoms" or "reduces the spread" like you may have heard froom other vaccines that don't actually work to stop infection entirely - in fact those sorts of claims required changing teh definition of what a vaccine even is just to call them vaccines.
If you get even one actual rabies symptom you're effectively dead already its the most lethal virus ever known to man with only a small handful of people having survived actual symptomatic rabies. Literally, last I looked the total number of survivors in all of history was around 10 people and all in the last few decades since "the milwaukee protocol" was discovered.
Survivors are put in a coma and cooled as much as possible without killing them, reducing brain swelling in the hopes of survival. Rabies causes the brain to swell eventually causing death. Survivors of the protocol almost certainly have brain damage, but they survive which is infinitely higher odds than the 0% survival rate of untreated rabies.
Medications are used to cause coma and increase survivability in a cold state, but nothing is actually administered to fight rabies itself at that point - the body has to fight it off using nature's immune system.
You don't want rabies - if you are even possibly at risk of exposure get the vaccine first, not after exposure because post exposure has worked but it has also failed. Pre-exposure vaccination definitely stops infection statistically speaking. Meanwhile, the Protocol is a better than 0.0000% chance at survival but its still not good odds.
So the annual flu season is really the annual "toxin season?"
I've tried to be open to the 'no viruses' idea, but I've seen SO MANY viruses blow through the family one after another based on how close they got to the originally infected person.
So it's all toxins.
Huh.
More accurately, probably the annual "detox" season.
But I can't PROVE it because guess what?
There is no MONEY in any narrative other than Big Pharma selling you drugs.
So, nobody will research other explanations.
Let me ask you a question: Do YOU actually KNOW how a virologist claims to PROVE that a virues exists, and that said virus is transmissable, and that said virus makes other people sick?
If you knew the answer(s), you would understand why the "no virus exists" people say what they do.
Maybe you would disagree with their reasoning or conclusion, but at least you would UNDERSTAND their position.
But you don't know, so you don't understand, as is the case for most people, even here on GAW.
That lack of understanding means you will not be able to figure how WHY the mainstream narrative is a lie -- and you won't know what to do about it.
Too many people, even here on GAW, are just too damn lazy.
"Too many people, even here on GAW, are just too damn lazy."
Look in the mirror.
"Polio" started happening in 1948."
FDR was stricken with polio in 1921. He died in 1945.
"But I can't PROVE it because guess what?'"
So certain about what you have no competence yourself to "PROVE," are you?
Start here:
https://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/19
"X-Ray Imaging of a Single Virus in 3D" Keith A. Nugent
ARC Centre of Excellence for Advanced Molecular Imaging, Department of Physics, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia March 2, 2015• Physics 8, 19
"An x-ray laser has imaged the three-dimensional structure of the mimivirus by combining hundreds of measurements on single virus particles.
"The authors used the giant mimivirus as their target—a simpler case than that of a small biomolecule. The mimivirus is one of the largest known viruses—about half a micrometer in diameter. First isolated in 1992 from amoebae growing in a water tower, it is thought to be the cause of certain forms of pneumonia."
One word: rabies. No one survived rabies until a vaccine was invented.
Actually the vaccine only works pre-exposure or immediately post exposure if the virus hasn't reached the nervous system yet. The rabies vaccine stops it from ever infecting you - it does nothing visible because it stops you from ever getting it. No "lessens the symptoms" or "reduces the spread" like you may have heard froom other vaccines that don't actually work to stop infection entirely - in fact those sorts of claims required changing teh definition of what a vaccine even is just to call them vaccines.
If you get even one actual rabies symptom you're effectively dead already its the most lethal virus ever known to man with only a small handful of people having survived actual symptomatic rabies. Literally, last I looked the total number of survivors in all of history was around 10 people and all in the last few decades since "the milwaukee protocol" was discovered.
Survivors are put in a coma and cooled as much as possible without killing them, reducing brain swelling in the hopes of survival. Rabies causes the brain to swell eventually causing death. Survivors of the protocol almost certainly have brain damage, but they survive which is infinitely higher odds than the 0% survival rate of untreated rabies.
Medications are used to cause coma and increase survivability in a cold state, but nothing is actually administered to fight rabies itself at that point - the body has to fight it off using nature's immune system.
You don't want rabies - if you are even possibly at risk of exposure get the vaccine first, not after exposure because post exposure has worked but it has also failed. Pre-exposure vaccination definitely stops infection statistically speaking. Meanwhile, the Protocol is a better than 0.0000% chance at survival but its still not good odds.