Are you kidding me? Where have you been? Obviously not on this board!
Plenty has been shown, thousands of pieces of evidence has come out!
Video proof, audio proof, witnesses, election workers, etc. Over 5,000 people came forward and signed affidavits that they had proof of election fraud. So much proof, but the corrupt DOJ, AG and FBI at the time would not investigate because they were involved in it.
Looky here, you get your rebuttal talking points from headlines from NPR without following up with these debunked "claims" you are making LOL. try harder. The first one is interesting, if more votes were found, regardless of the candidate what does that indicate? THAT the election count is inaccurate and therefore uncertifiable. How about that. hmmm
What has been debunked? 2000 mules has not been debunked.
Also, there was no debunking all of the multi-day-long hearings in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada that were televised with whistleblowers standing in line to share what they witnessed, either.
OK, so ONE of the 2,000 'mules' turns out to be a regular guy dropping off his family's ballots, 'eh? So one solitary person - Mark Andrews, a voter from Georgia was falsely depicted illegally voting in “2,000 Mules" according to the article. So what? The law says you may only drop off your own ballot and one other family member ONLY. He clearly dropped off more than that, which would have appeared to most observers as someone who was breaking the law.
But... What about the other 1,999? What about the 5,000 + affidavits from whistle blowers? What about all the rest. Surely, you haven't seen all of it like the rest of us here or you wouldn't even be asking this.
Are you kidding me? Where have you been? Obviously not on this board!
Plenty has been shown, thousands of pieces of evidence has come out!
Video proof, audio proof, witnesses, election workers, etc. Over 5,000 people came forward and signed affidavits that they had proof of election fraud. So much proof, but the corrupt DOJ, AG and FBI at the time would not investigate because they were involved in it.
A lot of that stuff has been debunked. I hope you don’t consider 2000 mules as evidence.
No it hasnt. The news has "said" its denbunked
Looky here, you get your rebuttal talking points from headlines from NPR without following up with these debunked "claims" you are making LOL. try harder. The first one is interesting, if more votes were found, regardless of the candidate what does that indicate? THAT the election count is inaccurate and therefore uncertifiable. How about that. hmmm
Yoire cherry picking a few cases in a ocean of real voter fraud
What has been debunked? 2000 mules has not been debunked.
Also, there was no debunking all of the multi-day-long hearings in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada that were televised with whistleblowers standing in line to share what they witnessed, either.
OK, so ONE of the 2,000 'mules' turns out to be a regular guy dropping off his family's ballots, 'eh? So one solitary person - Mark Andrews, a voter from Georgia was falsely depicted illegally voting in “2,000 Mules" according to the article. So what? The law says you may only drop off your own ballot and one other family member ONLY. He clearly dropped off more than that, which would have appeared to most observers as someone who was breaking the law.
But... What about the other 1,999? What about the 5,000 + affidavits from whistle blowers? What about all the rest. Surely, you haven't seen all of it like the rest of us here or you wouldn't even be asking this.
u/Tesla4517 Sorry, you are VERY WRONG!