I was going to wait until morning to report this for final results, but I think it is important to show a 1am snapshot of the results and point this out.
Wisconsin had 3 important votes on the ticket the race for an open Supreme Court seat, the Superintendent of Schools and a state referendum on solidifying voter ID laws, which it already had but Democrats had figured out a loophole that the state legislators were trying to close.
The numbers between these three races do not add up and point to voter fraud and more corruption from the Wisconsin Election Commission. Kenosha county is already being sued for not calibrating their tabulation machines. Milwaukee ran out of paper ballots and switched to easily manipulated digital voting etc.
But look at the raw numbers and tell me if you can explain what I am seeing.
Supreme Court Race
Susan Crawford: 1,284, 744 votes 55.1% @95% of the votes tabulated
Brad Schimel: 1,046,105 votes 44.9% @95% of the votes tabulated
Total votes: 2,330,849
Superintendent Race:
Jill Underly: 1,132,937 votes 52.9% @ 95% of votes tabulated
Brittany Kinser: 1,007,072 votes 47.1% @ 95% of votes tabulated
Total votes: 2,140,009
Referendum on voter ID:
Yes: 1,411,163 votes 62.7% @95% of votes tabulated
No: 884, 838 votes 37.3% @ 95% votes tabulated and this number has gone down in the last hour from over 900k
Total votes: 2,252,001
Right off the bat I should never see a reporting number decrease, so I call foul ball on that alone but there are 100k - 200k discrepancies of vote totals between these three races all on the same ballot.
Earlier tonight I saw 240k vote difference between the superintendent race vs Supreme court showing 240 k more votes for Crawford than what the superintendent was showing and similar numbers for the referendum.
At one point it showed 200k more votes total between supreme court race and referendum vote. it still shows 90k discrepancies.
I've been watching the numbers all night and if you can explain how 240k more people voted for Susan Crawford than the referendum and the superintendent race, I'd like to know. and explain to me how the reporting numbers have actually decreased by 100k since midnight in some catagories, I'd like to know that too.
The Wisconsin Election Commission is so deeply corrupt I would like to see the death penalty handed out for messing with our elections.
The RNC needs to send in their legal team and Trump needs to send in an army of FEDs.
great analysis of Wisc. election. Wisconsin needs a D.O.G.E. examination (as do many states)
It's called ... cheating.
Someone on X posted this-
Brenda Bethke @bethke_brenda · Wisconsin here. The reason Crawford won is because of the Students here on VISA'S our Governor doesn't seem to think it's illegal to let them vote. They all were in the Palestine protests. I wish they would get deported. Tony Evers is a Demon Rat POS. WE HAVE TRIED to recall him.
I am sick about this. I live in NE WI and for the first time ever I had to wait 40 minutes to vote. I felt good because I was hearing about massive turnouts everywhere. The clerk told me that this was the busiest they ever remember even in a presidential election. This is always good for us usually. I feel like I did after Biden won.
That's a bad feeling fren But remember after Biden we go Trump back,
Another X post-
David Clements @theprofsrecord “45,000+ votes to be counted overnight, Green Bay has a power outage. Suddenly, Madison is not gonna have votes counted for a couple of days. Déjà vu.”
From @mzbraribo
The GOP has no answer for machine driven fraud and mail-in ballots.
Here is your preview for the 2026 midterms.
Can DOGE audit elections?
Great analysis. Thank you,
Then certify nothing until it's uncovered.
GAW has discussed WEC (Wisconsin Election Commission) before.
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=WEC&community=GreatAwakening
These were particular, as they tie in CISA (which I believe could be examined by DOGE, no?)
Does DHS Have Constitutional Authority To Influence The Conduct Of Elections In The States Through CISA? Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley Cites CISA To Support Drop Boxes In ¶243 (Page 16) Of Dissenting Opinion In Teigen Vs WEC. (CISA NCSWIC Was Mentioned In Q Post 4951.)
Interestingly, ¶199 Of The Wisconsin Supreme Court Ruling On Teigen Vs WEC Mentions That The WEC August 2020 Memo Was Influenced By The Cybersecurity And Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). This Is The Same Agency Where NCSWIC Is Mentioned In Q Post 4951.
And yet.......it continues.
Yep. They continue to do it. Why wouldn't they?
Wisconsin might be made an example of. Dems control NOTHING and Trump holds all the cards. Election arrests need to start somewhere, so why not Wisconsin?
Discrepancy is common place in all elections.
That’s why voter id and paper ballots are the only way to fix it- our elections are made fun of all around the world