Open borders does not make a melting pot, it makes the chaos described above.
To make a melting pot of humanity you have to have ingredients that wish to join with other ingredients in the pot. That emphatically does NOT include people who show up waving the flag of their nation of origin.
The Melting Pot was solely just a narrative seed being planted into the masses to begin manipulating the public into accepting their replacements.
There is nothing wrong with true assimilation...it's just rarely ever done. There are people that have good intentions, and want to assimilate into their new homes...but the masses do the exact opposite. They keep every single thing with them, that they left behind....the good and the bad.
This is why you see little China, little Italy, little Mexico, etc.... you get the point i'm getting across. It's literally "them" creating a city within the city and has nothing to do with real assimilating.
You give an inch over the many years blindly, then you get the TX Muslim city being built next to your home where Sharia Law is king.
It's a hard redpill for some to take, and no, it has zero racist ties to it, just Truth and facts.
The Constitution was written with variations of Christianity in mind. The framers didn't take into account that one day we might be mass-importing people from a religion that taught, "Kill or subjugate all unbelievers unless they submit." If that had occurred to them, the Constitution's framers might have added a clause that excluded protection for the practice of murderous cults that called themselves a religion.
You can go by what they wrote, or by what you think they meant. Others may read minds differently though. And the framers cant be asked what they really meant when they wrote something that seems misleading, or like misinformation.
what i meant was that from the perspective of someone that wants a homogenous ethnographic OR religious group, the constitution is a roadblock. They say the constitution is the soul of America.
The melting pot was when people were still coming here by ship and airplane and properly registering themselves. Now we have walking biological weapons freely coming across our border, subhumans that have no value of life. We have dots that bathe in and eat cow dung coming here by the thousands being handed great jobs that should go to Americans first.
You're not wrong, and I do understand the difference.
My point was that the current additions do not blend with (assimilate to) the existing culture. When that is fixed (by locking out illegals, and screening new legal applicants) we can have our melting pot back.
I disagree.
Open borders does not make a melting pot, it makes the chaos described above.
To make a melting pot of humanity you have to have ingredients that wish to join with other ingredients in the pot. That emphatically does NOT include people who show up waving the flag of their nation of origin.
The Melting Pot was solely just a narrative seed being planted into the masses to begin manipulating the public into accepting their replacements.
There is nothing wrong with true assimilation...it's just rarely ever done. There are people that have good intentions, and want to assimilate into their new homes...but the masses do the exact opposite. They keep every single thing with them, that they left behind....the good and the bad.
This is why you see little China, little Italy, little Mexico, etc.... you get the point i'm getting across. It's literally "them" creating a city within the city and has nothing to do with real assimilating.
You give an inch over the many years blindly, then you get the TX Muslim city being built next to your home where Sharia Law is king.
It's a hard redpill for some to take, and no, it has zero racist ties to it, just Truth and facts.
constitutional rights get in the way. freedom of speech, freedom to practice religion, etc.. Was the constitution all a mistake? I dont think so
The Constitution was written with variations of Christianity in mind. The framers didn't take into account that one day we might be mass-importing people from a religion that taught, "Kill or subjugate all unbelievers unless they submit." If that had occurred to them, the Constitution's framers might have added a clause that excluded protection for the practice of murderous cults that called themselves a religion.
Two "religions" teach (more like demand) that, whether we're called infidel or goyim.
You can go by what they wrote, or by what you think they meant. Others may read minds differently though. And the framers cant be asked what they really meant when they wrote something that seems misleading, or like misinformation.
Can you elaborate on your comment?
what i meant was that from the perspective of someone that wants a homogenous ethnographic OR religious group, the constitution is a roadblock. They say the constitution is the soul of America.
You are right, and wrong. Scratching the surface. There are still limitations to these freedoms.
Read more into "freedom to practice religion" in the constitution, then understand Sharia Law. There is a major conflict here.
i.e. - freedom of speech - you can't say bomb on an airplane without repercussions now can you?
The melting pot was when people were still coming here by ship and airplane and properly registering themselves. Now we have walking biological weapons freely coming across our border, subhumans that have no value of life. We have dots that bathe in and eat cow dung coming here by the thousands being handed great jobs that should go to Americans first.
You're not wrong, and I do understand the difference.
My point was that the current additions do not blend with (assimilate to) the existing culture. When that is fixed (by locking out illegals, and screening new legal applicants) we can have our melting pot back.