...chilling...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Source linked in the image says something quite different: examining VAERS reports of death post-vaccination, "For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day." In other words, 3/4 kids who died following vaccination had more than one vaccine administered on the day they were vaccinated. It does not claim what the image claims. The report actually begins by claiming that vaccines are extremely safe but adverse events occur on rare occasions.
" "For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day." "
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001268
• Additive or synergistic toxicity may occur following multivalent vaccination.
• Infant deaths post-vaccination are often misclassified as SIDS or suffocation in bed.
• Of all reported SIDS cases post-vaccination, 75 % occurred within 7 days (p < 0.00001).
Every one of those claims is different from the one in the image.
"Every one of those claims is different from the one in the image."
...why is this important...
...what is the bottom line...
The importance is the clarity and accuracy of the message. Is the claim in the image even present in the source material?
lol. good one. misinfo is necessary
This does bring up an interesting question.
If it is two or more vaccines that 79.4% of SIDS cases had, then it is true that 79.4% of SIDS cases did have one vaccine on the same day. It’s just not a fully accurate representation of the situation, but it’s also not false.
However, a few things occur from that. If vaccines aren’t actually safe or beneficial, which is a possibility, then it’s inaccurate in a positive direction.
It’s totally possible to look at this meme as a troll, which opens up a conversation into some very important issues we haven’t been able to discuss. If someone is good at that approach, and if vaccines aren’t safe, that aspect could open up some good avenues of discussion - “talking past the sale”, as it were.
Not saying trolling is right or wrong, but a certain Papi Trumo does it all the time, and it does seem to work.
Two threads with lots of info on this:
If they’re intentionally murdering us, is the bigger issue that a meme should say “two” vaccines instead of “one” to be fully accurate, or that they’re definitely murdering us and lying about it, and we need to figure out how to get ground-level eyes looking at this in earnest to figure out precisely what’s going on and get the word out? Why aren’t they telling us about these correlations?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BH6Prr1nvJY&t=140
Frustrating that someone downvoted you, Lawjic. I just made a similar post to yours.
The fastest way to lose a debate is to overstate one's argument. I'm sorry if people don't like hat Lawjic is saying, but he/she is absolutely correct. The statement made in the image and the linked data are incongruent.
Agreed, these deaths are only being reported to VAERS because they had a vaccine close to death. This isn't looking at ALL sids deaths as the image claims.