My first experience with X and Grok. Ho lee shit it's worse than bad. They're literally showing us what their future technocracy government will be like. You thought automated Customer Service was bad over the phone? Wait til it's like that for EVERYTHING π
(media.greatawakening.win)
Trust That Ai Knows π©Hitsπͺ
I heard a Dr describe what coming AI medicine will be like. AI will hear your symptoms and prescribe a series of prescriptions in conjunction with big pharma. Imagine this scenario trying to get help with an ailment.
βDear customer, your LDL cholesterol is 101. Statin prescription and three others have been sent to your pharmacy. Your account has been charged $300 dollars.β
Your self driving car βsir, I am unable to take you on a Sunday drive because your account has been disabled due to posts made on twitterβ. Please correct that with positive posts about your current president, Alexandria Nina Pinta and Santamaria Cortez.β
China is already like that. The WeChat phone app is ubiquitous and tracks everything.
Literal hellscape.
This is complete and utter bullshit. I'm literally being punished for being active on the platform and getting NO help in engagement. The only way to get engagement is to fuckin cluck around like a dumb chicken repeating the stupid shit they want you to talk about. YOU WILL NOT GROW BY SPEAKING YOUR MIND. You must conform or die into obscurity.
Anybody have any tips to actually get your account up on this new AI powered fucking goddamn bullshit sr for the language piss off if ur sensitive?
and yes i'm already shadowbanned https://files.catbox.moe/wu7ltz.jpeg
I would not be surprised to learn that lefty software people that worked for twitter put millions of lines of code into the algorithm with hard-coded filters to block thousands of specific people.
I don't know what it is, but every piece of SW I've ever had to touch that was previously developed by left leaning developers has always been the worst pile of steaming poo spaghetti code. They can't write simple code to do a simple task. Half the time when they see my code, I've been told it's all wrong. Does it work? - yes. Is it simple? - yes. What's wrong with it? - long philosophical argument about coding styles, cross functional platforms, don't like it, etc, - but not one word of why.
I write A + B = C. Done
They write a half dozen or more cross linked functions and subroutines that check the scope of each variable, bit shift the numbers to drop unwanted significant digits (because you have to have a check for that), maybe convert types because the function that is allowed to do the addition only accepts a specific type like a string that requires it's own conversion to actually perform the addition, etc. And if you think you're going to get away with writing A + B = C, think again - they've already written algorithms to scrub the code looking for code like that outside of their approved function to perform that task.
You might thing I'm joking. I wish I was. It wasn't specifically A + b = C, because that would be too obvious, but it was enough other relatively simple tasks to drive a guy mad.
"I don't know what it is, but every piece of SW I've ever had to touch that was previously developed by left leaning developers has always been the worst pile of steaming poo spaghetti code. They can't write simple code to do a simple task."
We affectionately referred to this as, "running around the house ten times to get through the front door."
The nice thing about object oriented code is you can define the house, define the door, define the path around the house, inherit the path distance and loop counts from the requirements class, and implement an Interface to execute the run function, run loop counter, and run complete event, door handing functions & events, and house entered definitions & events.
Otherwise, how are going to know if you actually went through the front door without a task complete event from the interface that was observed by 3 other unrelated threads?
Try posting memes for awhile.
Ty, will try that π
Hi fren.
Cool it please!
It's early on a Saturday morning and not too many people are on the forum right now.
I don't think he's referring to this post but to something else.
I've been heated about another issue on here
u/PeasantPower is right,
I read that comment too fast when I was on the way out of the door.
You are only talking to what amounts to a tape recorder. Sometimes you can have fun outing it as such. For example, I get robocalls hawking new Medicare benefits. "Do you have any other medical problems?" "Yes, I am decapitated." "Okay, we can get you started with one of our representatives." My favorite is when they ask whether I "have Medicare Part A or B?" I answer, "No, but I have a PENIS. Do you want to talk about THAT?" Remarkably, that terminates the call. Very reliably. Doesn't stop the calls, unfortunately. It doesn't help that the robot hands you off to a boiler-room in Delhi. "Hello, my name is Robert, and I am from Bafflegabincorporated." "Say what?" "Bfflgbncrprtd." And then if you string one of them out, they will curse at you. Pretty remarkable customer satisfaction strategy.
But the major platforms are just in it for their convenience, not for the customer's satisfaction. What can better say "We don't give a fuck about you," than when they demonstrate it from their behavior. They make it impossible to connect with any human being. I call this "anti-communication": the policy and practice of preventing communication. In my effort to circumvent an unproductive phone tree robot, I will call just about any other phone number on record for a given organization, simply in order to connect with a PERSON. And when I do, I ask them to connect me with the department I need to talk to. This is atrocious customer service, and I hope that this will become a competitive discriminator. "Give us a call. We have a human operator who speaks English clearly." Do you think that would sell?
AI is nothing but a tool.
Claude Helps me write.
Don't be a Luddite or Amish