Jordan Sather's advice to his younger self on how to navigate the Great Awakening
(jordansather.substack.com)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
I like Sather. Early on I thought he was just another Opp. Over the years I've listened he changed my mind. I think he has a pretty good rationale about his subjects and I would encourage people to follow him.
I appreciate his skepticism. He has pulled me out of several rabbit holes.
He has grown. Ego was a bit of an issue, but maturity ages well. I followed his first podcasts. Interesting mind.
Good article 💯
Careful with Sather. I'm pretty sure he is a shill or at best a paytriot. I don't have any specific sauce ATM but I remember that he had some bad blood a while back with some of the people who were telling the truth very early on and are now proven. It's very likely that he is a deep cover Zionist.
I don't get that vibe from him at all. I'd point out that he's exposed a bunch of infiltrators such as Charlie Ward and Simon Parks.
Good sticky decision.
We are an anon movement. We value information more than celebrity.
I don't get the need to elevate and place influencers on a pedestal, as if their celebrity gives an extra umph to whatever information they're supposed to be bringing to the table.
I already discount this guy as a fruitcake because he treats UFO's like he's been on a visit to the mothership.
My problem is that now, I and all other anons are now tainted as fruitcakes by association -- because he's on a pedestal as an authority figure in the movement (because he's pinned at the top of GAW) and voila -- we're all now alien mothership visitors by association.
The post is geared towards newcomers in the great awakening. Frankly, if I were originally introduced to Q by being exposed to Jordan Sather, I would have immediately left having no desire to learn anything from a "UFO's are real" grifter.
Jordan Sather is among the least "fruitcakey" influencers out there.
If your hot take from my post is that I'm angry, that's on you and your inability to comprehend words.
I categorically reject any named person who attempts to set themselves up as an influencer in the Q movement. If your name isn't Trump, nobody cares.
If you can't fathom why, then here's a little help: Jerome Corsi, Jack Posobiec, Alex Jones and associates, Ron Watkins, NeonRevolt, SerialBrain2.
There's no reason to suffer influencers in the Q movement, who build their little followings to eventually lead astray. Again, this is an anon movement.
If Jordan Sather cared to influence Q followers, he could have posted the data anonymously and, if the data was good, would have been widely seen and recommended.
If people won't participate trying to liberate the world unless they get paid, or demand to have their names revered, then who gives a shit what they have to say?
There's no reason to trust Jordan Sather, that he's actually not a sleeper Mossad agent ready to make us all appear like fools once he's firmly established himself as a leader in the Q movement -- if his information is good then discuss the good information. If the information is being used to promote Jordan Sather (which it is) then that's a different story. The damage would be in the potential that he could pull a Ron Watkins like Ron did on HBO.
Your approach would leave the Great Awakening rudderless. Leadership is key. You may call them "influencers" but that's the role they play. Like it or not, that's how humans work. It's up to us to discern good leaders, but your blanket approach would stall the movement as surely as infiltrators.
The point remains that you don't know Sather's work well enough to stand in judgement of it with any credibility. I don't particularly TRUST anybody, but Sather is among those whom I've found the least reason to distrust.
Not a Sather follower / fan, but still good advice for the newly repilled and the black pilled too.
#10 I hard not to do.