Starting in the 1980's I labored for ten years in "cube-ville" and enjoyed Mr. Adams' "Dilbert" musings.
Him saying "I (Uncle_Fester) won" is a hollow victory.
Taken further, he is acknowledging what the future holds. A greater proportion of the populace will be pure bloods. It was a genetic event as significant as the evolution of Homo Sapiens 300,000 years ago.
Covid-19 was not just a bio-weapon. It was an intelligence test.
Intelligence has absolutely nothing to do with compliance.
You could have an IQ of 200 and be easily pressured into compliance or an IQ of 80 and be an ornery fuck who never complies with anything on principle.
Please let's stop confusing "smart" with all other virtues and vices.
Not sure this is true. There was plenty of information available for those willing to inform themselves. The intelligent course was to do that, not believe what the nice people on TV or the "experts" had to say. I have some otherwise very intelligent capable friends who failed the test - even with me informing them. Maybe not so intelligent, after all.
Exactly. And I would even take it a step further; There were plenty of unknowns. It was always retarded to take a vaccine with so many unknowns. Take with that that RNA-virusses mutate very very quickly (vaccine can not be effective) and if it could even impart any immunity, that immunity would need to be in the airways and not anywhere else (vaccine would be ineffective).
We knew all this from March 2020 onward. It was enough to at least wait it out when it came to the vaccine. Soon after enough information was available to know that the quality control on mRNA is difficult and large-scale production would result in mRNA chains of unknown length. We knew about DNA-contamination. We expected transcription of the mRNA into the DNA (how else does human DNA have large quantities of DNA of viral origin in it?).
Etc.
He could have known it all had he postponed knee-jerk judgment and actually looked at the information and heard from experts who did not just push the narrative.
There is infinite information on everything, available from an unprocessessible amount of sources.
The question isn't about availability, it's about trust and correctly judging which sources of information to trust.
Trusting those institutions which were created to safeguard information integrity isn't a sign of low intelligence, but more like a lack of experience with having your trust broken
Starting in the 1980's I labored for ten years in "cube-ville" and enjoyed Mr. Adams' "Dilbert" musings.
Him saying "I (Uncle_Fester) won" is a hollow victory.
Taken further, he is acknowledging what the future holds. A greater proportion of the populace will be pure bloods. It was a genetic event as significant as the evolution of Homo Sapiens 300,000 years ago.
Covid-19 was not just a bio-weapon. It was an intelligence test.
Intelligence has absolutely nothing to do with compliance.
You could have an IQ of 200 and be easily pressured into compliance or an IQ of 80 and be an ornery fuck who never complies with anything on principle.
Please let's stop confusing "smart" with all other virtues and vices.
THANK YOU for this concise & TRUE statement👌
Not sure this is true. There was plenty of information available for those willing to inform themselves. The intelligent course was to do that, not believe what the nice people on TV or the "experts" had to say. I have some otherwise very intelligent capable friends who failed the test - even with me informing them. Maybe not so intelligent, after all.
Exactly. And I would even take it a step further; There were plenty of unknowns. It was always retarded to take a vaccine with so many unknowns. Take with that that RNA-virusses mutate very very quickly (vaccine can not be effective) and if it could even impart any immunity, that immunity would need to be in the airways and not anywhere else (vaccine would be ineffective).
We knew all this from March 2020 onward. It was enough to at least wait it out when it came to the vaccine. Soon after enough information was available to know that the quality control on mRNA is difficult and large-scale production would result in mRNA chains of unknown length. We knew about DNA-contamination. We expected transcription of the mRNA into the DNA (how else does human DNA have large quantities of DNA of viral origin in it?).
Etc.
He could have known it all had he postponed knee-jerk judgment and actually looked at the information and heard from experts who did not just push the narrative.
There is infinite information on everything, available from an unprocessessible amount of sources.
The question isn't about availability, it's about trust and correctly judging which sources of information to trust.
Trusting those institutions which were created to safeguard information integrity isn't a sign of low intelligence, but more like a lack of experience with having your trust broken
True. I have friend at work,whose dumb as hell,and didn't take the vax.
How about “compliance” test?
The IQ is a measure of how well you can take IQ tests --- that's it.
And your ability to take IQ tests absolutely correlates with your ability to perform different cognitively difficult tasks.
Your ability to take IQ tests absolutely correlates with your ability to take IQ tests.
Elon said as much. About a month ago Elon posted ‘it was a test’.