Now, now. There are huge swaths of land in red areas yet the vast majority of liberals live in big cities. Austin Texas comes to mind. Texas always has a hard time not electing liberals because of those dense liberal concentrations. Yea, I agree there is whole scale vote cheating going on, but also dense population centers need to be looked at, too.
Sure, but that blue dot has way more population than a huge chunk of the surrounding red sea. I’ll echo the first guy in that I’m perfectly willing to believe there’s some fraud and/or system gaming going on—vote miscounting, gerrymandering, illegal voting, some combination of all of those—but nonetheless, the map doesn’t really represent red voters vastly outnumbering blue voters, even though it might look like it does.
Agreed. But it does lead to the hypothesis that liberalism is an urban mental disorder. And it reminds me of the arguments that Jefferson used to have between the agricultural and the city life. Though I'm a city kid and defend the existence and purpose of cities, I think there is a lot to say for the agricultural life, as it involves the necessity of important virtues.
Yep. But PDJT is going to expose all of those hole and if any one is boring holes in that dike he's gonna arrest them and they get an all expense paid vacation to Gitmo, with hemp rope included as a bonus.
Nobody other than a small percentage of hardcore progressives ever votes left. No one wants their BS. Whatever resources progressives acquire are invested in corrupting the local vote which eventually- when polluted enough- has National effects
Now, now. There are huge swaths of land in red areas yet the vast majority of liberals live in big cities. Austin Texas comes to mind. Texas always has a hard time not electing liberals because of those dense liberal concentrations. Yea, I agree there is whole scale vote cheating going on, but also dense population centers need to be looked at, too.
I second this. You can't really compare one to the other because one map is based on area and the other is based on population. Low-grade post, IMO.
Austin is that blue dot 🔵 in the center of TX on that map.
Sure, but that blue dot has way more population than a huge chunk of the surrounding red sea. I’ll echo the first guy in that I’m perfectly willing to believe there’s some fraud and/or system gaming going on—vote miscounting, gerrymandering, illegal voting, some combination of all of those—but nonetheless, the map doesn’t really represent red voters vastly outnumbering blue voters, even though it might look like it does.
Agreed. But it does lead to the hypothesis that liberalism is an urban mental disorder. And it reminds me of the arguments that Jefferson used to have between the agricultural and the city life. Though I'm a city kid and defend the existence and purpose of cities, I think there is a lot to say for the agricultural life, as it involves the necessity of important virtues.
"...yet the vast majority of liberals live in big cities."
It's always the cities. Many Red states are like that -- held captive by the deep-blue cities.
Yep. But PDJT is going to expose all of those hole and if any one is boring holes in that dike he's gonna arrest them and they get an all expense paid vacation to Gitmo, with hemp rope included as a bonus.
Nobody other than a small percentage of hardcore progressives ever votes left. No one wants their BS. Whatever resources progressives acquire are invested in corrupting the local vote which eventually- when polluted enough- has National effects