Very interesting. I always thought the golden dome to protect us from missiles was strange. This makes way more sense. But I guess it can protect us from missiles as well as spiritual protection?
Literally incredible. "Golden Dome" is only a marketing metaphoric twist on "Iron Dome," which itself is a metaphor. The whole concept derives from the Strategic Defense Initiative of the early 1980s, which came from the preceding High Frontier study. It is a legacy of layered strategic defense concepts dating back to the 1960s. The Israeli Arrow system got its start with SDI. (I attended one of the early technology exchange conferences at Redstone Arsenal. Everyone had bright ideas to share, and looked down upon the Israelis, who were showing photographs of the hardware they were building.)
No magical technology is involved. Don't be so eager to anoint anyone as a prophet, when we were warned against doing so.
Correct. “Golden Dome” is THE NAME very much like the “SDI” called “Star Wars” in Reagan era.
The Golden Dome DoD Proposal just put out was completed in 2022. The existing “layered defense” is being supplemented with additional layers and technologies. It is managed by MDA setup by Reagan in 1983: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Defense_Agency
There are at least two “new” technologies being added that appear “magical”. These are likely space-based lasers and remote hacking/reprogram of the missile control/targeting system. Theoretically, any nuke launched can be reprogrammed real-time with the target coordinates of the launch origin (or nearby). Can you say MEGA-DETERRENT?
You’ve killed us, Captain. -First Officer of Konovalov (Hunt for Red October)
They are not likely to be space-based lasers. We worked on them during SDI. Too big and having dubious effect. Only good during boost phase. Easier job with an interceptor. Now, as an anti-satellite weapon, the game is more favorable. But there are sneakier methods (I was involved in devising them).
I don't have much belief in remote hacking. Once a bird is underway, the portal for communication is gone. I don't get where your "theory" is coming from. It's not true. My education in the business is that the weapon is entirely self-contained. The early ICBM radio launch guidance method was abandoned in favor of inertial guidance out of concern for EMP, jamming, or other electronic measures.
Unverified report of US military having some sort of “piggyback” hacking drone that can intercept and attach itself to an enemy missile in order to alter its trajectory or impair its booster in some way (shaped charge on booster sidewall?). This was being talked about in 1990s (circa 1996?) in Popular Science and other quasi-Sci-Fi circles as a “potential weapon” and then it disappeared, indicating to me that they probably actually built it.
THAAD was demonstrating “kinetic kill” in late 80s/early 90s. Next iteration (much harder) of that may have been “kinetic capture” if that is the correct terminology.
I will bet it is unverified, all right. It sounds completely bogus. Bad ideas are also dropped because they are bad ideas. How far away is the missile from the drone launch site? Is the missile under boost? That's too difficult a problem to solve, because we generally get notice of a missile after it is launched, and after it is finished boosting. It also depends on whether it is a tactical, intermediate, or intercontinental ballistic missile. The last can be dealt with by an orbital interceptor constellation, while in boost phase (long enough boost, high enough altitude).
First launch of THAAD was in 2005, and it wasn't ready for deployment until 2008. But kinetic kill as a mechanism was demonstrated dramatically by the Delta 180 experiment, with the complete disintegration of the target vehicle. Apparently, the high-speed shock created compression waves in the structure that resulted in total spallation of the target. We were in those days completing work on a space-based satellite defender using a large "flyswatter" as the kill mechanism. Our work then shifted to the desired development of a 1-kg projectile, the Flying Brick. I invented an approach, which later won a development contract, which later became the world's first solid-propellant 3-axis-stabiiized kinetic kill vehicle, which we tried to sell to the Air Force and failed. Hughes picked up the propulsion work we had contracted with Thiokol, developed their version, was bought by Raytheon, and the end of that genealogy is currently the kill vehicle warhead of the Standard 3 missile, in service since 2004. They used it to kill an old satellite in 2008 to see if it was possible. Kill vehicle warheads have been standard for the Ground-Based Interceptor missile, deployed since 2004.
There is no point to "kinetic capture," whatever that could be. KEW improvement is mostly along the lines of reliability and accuracy.
Possibly “space-reflected/directed” lasers rather than “space-based”? That seems to be what we do with radio waves, so maybe that is analogous for different freq/wavelengths used as weapons?
Even more difficult. I designed a laser beam reflector constellation to deal with (e.g.) Scud missiles in the Persian Gulf. Very huge satellites and it requires redundancy of the ground laser to cope with cloud-free line-of-sight requirements (probably 3 sites). Multi-megawatt power levels. Expensive. Interesting sensitivity to the number of reflector nodes available in orbit, and orbital altitude.
There is very little operational comparison between lasers and radio. Lasers require very high intensity on target (50-100 watts/cm2) but radio requires maybe milliwatts/cm2. Laser is stopped by clouds; radio isn't. Conversion efficiency for production of laser radiation is poor; for radio, not so bad.
Remote-hacking of modern nav/control systems of missiles has supposedly been demonstrated using “tight beam laser infiltration” by US Army, whatever that means. Location of guidance computer within the system as well as correct laser frequency/wavelength must be known from what I’ve read. Range of effectiveness (laser to target) may be an issue as well as maintaining target lock while in flight. Probably level 11 challenge to do it on hypersonic missile. Could be a misdirect from something else as you are observing.
I would have to see more about this. I don't understand how a laser beam can "infiltrate" electrical technology, unless you are trying to hack a laser-guided missile.
A hypersonic missile will have a serious boundary-layer refraction problem, and I don't think it will have any external communication ports to exploit.
I was referring to Sharleta Bassett as a prophetess. Thomas Bearden is off on a head trip: secret, suppressed technologies; Chernobyl not caused by a reactor fire; the Challenger not destroyed by a faulty booster rocket.
To forecast is to bring down a curse, so I am wary. But I do have an objective to write my career memoirs. It would all be unclassified, of course. I will freely reference my reports by number, against the expectation that my company has either thrown them away or they are lost in the system. Not only do we fail to record what we know, we have no regard for its preservation. And people wonder "Why can't we do this?" People talk about "lessons learned" being a part of the development process, but I have seen more of "lessons unlearned."
cotton & wool have frequencies that cancel each other out, but on their own, they have much heathful frquencies than modern nylon & other materials
my favorite Trey Smith is when he went to a health / nutrition clinic in Kansas & the health clinician or naturopath demonstrated the quantum nature of natural remedies versus allergens — I don’t see this video available anymore, wish I had saved it
As I’ve been noting some, the biblical diet and clothing (and other Torah teachings) are not irrelevant or done away with as the infiltrated church teaches, but continue to be very relevant to how we should live, and will be much more important again if certain roadblocks are removed.
These posts would be the physical manifestation of those spiritual truths.
It’s actually much much easier to follow the food commandments than the clothing ones, on account of there not being much availability of clothing, and it being often fairly high priced compared to the petrochemical garbage.
Why? Because control was either given up or taken, or because it was just so easy to hand over.
I keep hearing supposed Christians talking about how doing things the right way would be way too inconvenient, or would not be good for too many people, or would make too many waves in the status quo…
THOSE ARE THE THINGS YOU SING ABOUT EVERY SUNDAY.
2 Timothy 3:5 - Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
It gets on my nerves, man. I certainly don’t follow the Bible perfectly, but there’s resistance on directional will and intent from “believers” that I simply don’t get. Some of these resistances are more agreed on as being wrong, some less so, and the errancy much more entrenched.
It seems like there’s a mindset of “as long as faith doesn’t require any sacrifices on my part.”
Like, does anyone understand why we were given a model of the sacrificial system in the OT? Self-sacrifice is the foundation of faith… JESUS SACRIFICED HIMSELF ON THE CROSS AND WAS PRESENTED AS OUR MODEL. For crying out loud…. “More of you, and less of me (unless I mean that literally, in which case I love my life).”
He who loves his life will lose it.
Matthew 16:24 - Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any [man] will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
Mark 10:21 - Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
I’m really not sure even the path I’ve chosen is the proper path, assuming im even walking it correctly. There’s things where I’m not sure even my attempts at adherence would be hitting the mark.
I have a hunch “the church” is in process of moving away from “we have a building” and back to smaller, more home-based congregations.
Methodist is definitely a mess. Even my own movement has its issues, though thankfully not those, but there’s no avoiding wrestling with the consequences of adding or removing scripture, or neglecting some aspects.
good thought, very relevant & will be much more important again…
departing from Egypt and then camping in the wilderness for about 40 yrs. ancient Israelites needed laws, guidance and instructions in order to survive.
Teachers often share definitions of Greek words, such as charis grace.
But rarely are Hebrew words like Torah defined. We’re told it means “the law” but it actually includes, teaching, guidance, and instructions. I think that in military encampment situations, God gave commands. Laws were set forth, and in some situations with strong penalties.
The people also needed guidance and instructions for living differently than when they were in slavery in Egypt.
Maybe Christ in Mt. 5:17-20 where it talks about Christ came not to “abolish” but to fulfill — could it be that Christ came not to end it, but to make it complete, whole, bring it to fullness? Showing how to live with God’s teachings, not as a list of do’s and dont’s as the rabbis made it (Isaiah 28:10) where God forewarned through Isaiah that if the people did not follow with their hearts, what was meant to be “not so difficult” (Deuteronomy 30:11-14) would be replaced by what the rabbis brought, burdensome long lists of regulations stacked upon God’s simple teachings.
I like to track and observe the 7 celebrations God gave in the books of Moses, but God provided the Lamb, I don’t need to sacrifice animals, and the grain offerings I think is symbolic of the harvest of souls who want to be in relationship with God.
yeah, clothing is expensive, Senator Ernest Hollings was the last of the ‘80s and ‘90s southern democrats who opposed globalism and giving away our textiles industry away, so that technology, the god of technocracy and transhumanism could take over.
Pretty much exactly how I’ve been looking at things for the last several years.
Not only is learning and doing The Teachings good for us, but not doing them or learning them is bad for us. They’re the foundation of everything that was taught by Jesus and the apostles. Money and business practices. Health. Sanctification. Addressing grievances. Caritas. Family. Prophetic timing. Identification of false prophets. Treating your servants. Farming and ranching. Courts. Avoiding idolatry. Recognizing when your nation is coming under a curse. (we are under quite a few right now!)
I recently got pretty upset when I realized I’d learned infinitely more about not giving or receiving bribes, or the importance thereof, from secular corporate training than I had from a lifetime of attending church, when the Bible talks about it fairly extensively.
… but to say we shouldn’t engage in bribery requires acknowledging The Teachings, or “The Law”, so we can’t do that. It’s a mess. I’ve been quite upset with the 501C3’s. “Not many of you should teach.”
“But the penalties for breaking the teachings were so steep! How can God be so fearsome?”
“I have good news, we have grace now. There was only imperfect grace before, through an imperfect system that still modeled our current one, but … that also could still be us, so take that fear and use it to avoid sin. Less sin is good. More sin is bad. Don’t sin!”
The Iron Dome system is for all levels of aerial or ballistic attack. It includes all the Arrow interceptors. Arrow 3 is capable of intercepting ICBMs up to an altitude of 100 km.
It’s all beginning to make sense, from the removal of all the bells, the distortion of music etc. it’s all frequency related.
They are manipulating sound and frequencies, 5g phone signals being the latest, to make us sick, confused and dependent on their system.
Very interesting. I always thought the golden dome to protect us from missiles was strange. This makes way more sense. But I guess it can protect us from missiles as well as spiritual protection?
That would kill the cell phone system I’d assume. Probably wireless as well, as we know it. I wonder what we’d get instead?
Literally incredible. "Golden Dome" is only a marketing metaphoric twist on "Iron Dome," which itself is a metaphor. The whole concept derives from the Strategic Defense Initiative of the early 1980s, which came from the preceding High Frontier study. It is a legacy of layered strategic defense concepts dating back to the 1960s. The Israeli Arrow system got its start with SDI. (I attended one of the early technology exchange conferences at Redstone Arsenal. Everyone had bright ideas to share, and looked down upon the Israelis, who were showing photographs of the hardware they were building.)
No magical technology is involved. Don't be so eager to anoint anyone as a prophet, when we were warned against doing so.
Correct. “Golden Dome” is THE NAME very much like the “SDI” called “Star Wars” in Reagan era.
The Golden Dome DoD Proposal just put out was completed in 2022. The existing “layered defense” is being supplemented with additional layers and technologies. It is managed by MDA setup by Reagan in 1983: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Defense_Agency
NGI, a component of the current GD had initial proposal engineering work completed in 2020 under Trump I with a downselect in late 2020 or early 2021: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground-Based_Interceptor#Next_generation_interceptor_(NGI)
There are at least two “new” technologies being added that appear “magical”. These are likely space-based lasers and remote hacking/reprogram of the missile control/targeting system. Theoretically, any nuke launched can be reprogrammed real-time with the target coordinates of the launch origin (or nearby). Can you say MEGA-DETERRENT?
They are not likely to be space-based lasers. We worked on them during SDI. Too big and having dubious effect. Only good during boost phase. Easier job with an interceptor. Now, as an anti-satellite weapon, the game is more favorable. But there are sneakier methods (I was involved in devising them).
I don't have much belief in remote hacking. Once a bird is underway, the portal for communication is gone. I don't get where your "theory" is coming from. It's not true. My education in the business is that the weapon is entirely self-contained. The early ICBM radio launch guidance method was abandoned in favor of inertial guidance out of concern for EMP, jamming, or other electronic measures.
Unverified report of US military having some sort of “piggyback” hacking drone that can intercept and attach itself to an enemy missile in order to alter its trajectory or impair its booster in some way (shaped charge on booster sidewall?). This was being talked about in 1990s (circa 1996?) in Popular Science and other quasi-Sci-Fi circles as a “potential weapon” and then it disappeared, indicating to me that they probably actually built it.
THAAD was demonstrating “kinetic kill” in late 80s/early 90s. Next iteration (much harder) of that may have been “kinetic capture” if that is the correct terminology.
I will bet it is unverified, all right. It sounds completely bogus. Bad ideas are also dropped because they are bad ideas. How far away is the missile from the drone launch site? Is the missile under boost? That's too difficult a problem to solve, because we generally get notice of a missile after it is launched, and after it is finished boosting. It also depends on whether it is a tactical, intermediate, or intercontinental ballistic missile. The last can be dealt with by an orbital interceptor constellation, while in boost phase (long enough boost, high enough altitude).
First launch of THAAD was in 2005, and it wasn't ready for deployment until 2008. But kinetic kill as a mechanism was demonstrated dramatically by the Delta 180 experiment, with the complete disintegration of the target vehicle. Apparently, the high-speed shock created compression waves in the structure that resulted in total spallation of the target. We were in those days completing work on a space-based satellite defender using a large "flyswatter" as the kill mechanism. Our work then shifted to the desired development of a 1-kg projectile, the Flying Brick. I invented an approach, which later won a development contract, which later became the world's first solid-propellant 3-axis-stabiiized kinetic kill vehicle, which we tried to sell to the Air Force and failed. Hughes picked up the propulsion work we had contracted with Thiokol, developed their version, was bought by Raytheon, and the end of that genealogy is currently the kill vehicle warhead of the Standard 3 missile, in service since 2004. They used it to kill an old satellite in 2008 to see if it was possible. Kill vehicle warheads have been standard for the Ground-Based Interceptor missile, deployed since 2004.
There is no point to "kinetic capture," whatever that could be. KEW improvement is mostly along the lines of reliability and accuracy.
Interesting.
Possibly “space-reflected/directed” lasers rather than “space-based”? That seems to be what we do with radio waves, so maybe that is analogous for different freq/wavelengths used as weapons?
Even more difficult. I designed a laser beam reflector constellation to deal with (e.g.) Scud missiles in the Persian Gulf. Very huge satellites and it requires redundancy of the ground laser to cope with cloud-free line-of-sight requirements (probably 3 sites). Multi-megawatt power levels. Expensive. Interesting sensitivity to the number of reflector nodes available in orbit, and orbital altitude.
There is very little operational comparison between lasers and radio. Lasers require very high intensity on target (50-100 watts/cm2) but radio requires maybe milliwatts/cm2. Laser is stopped by clouds; radio isn't. Conversion efficiency for production of laser radiation is poor; for radio, not so bad.
Proof that frequency matters.
Remote-hacking of modern nav/control systems of missiles has supposedly been demonstrated using “tight beam laser infiltration” by US Army, whatever that means. Location of guidance computer within the system as well as correct laser frequency/wavelength must be known from what I’ve read. Range of effectiveness (laser to target) may be an issue as well as maintaining target lock while in flight. Probably level 11 challenge to do it on hypersonic missile. Could be a misdirect from something else as you are observing.
I would have to see more about this. I don't understand how a laser beam can "infiltrate" electrical technology, unless you are trying to hack a laser-guided missile.
A hypersonic missile will have a serious boundary-layer refraction problem, and I don't think it will have any external communication ports to exploit.
Tom Bearden a prophet? He wasn't, he was years ahead of his time, thats all.
I was referring to Sharleta Bassett as a prophetess. Thomas Bearden is off on a head trip: secret, suppressed technologies; Chernobyl not caused by a reactor fire; the Challenger not destroyed by a faulty booster rocket.
To forecast is to bring down a curse, so I am wary. But I do have an objective to write my career memoirs. It would all be unclassified, of course. I will freely reference my reports by number, against the expectation that my company has either thrown them away or they are lost in the system. Not only do we fail to record what we know, we have no regard for its preservation. And people wonder "Why can't we do this?" People talk about "lessons learned" being a part of the development process, but I have seen more of "lessons unlearned."
Probably this, scroll down to where it says Tesla Domes.
http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm
cool stuff!
I don’t know too much about this site, but about 4 years ago I found a frequencies site on linen & wool. your post & comments reminded me of it. https://theinseasonlifestyle.com/do-not-mix-linen-with-wool/
cotton & wool have frequencies that cancel each other out, but on their own, they have much heathful frquencies than modern nylon & other materials
my favorite Trey Smith is when he went to a health / nutrition clinic in Kansas & the health clinician or naturopath demonstrated the quantum nature of natural remedies versus allergens — I don’t see this video available anymore, wish I had saved it
As I’ve been noting some, the biblical diet and clothing (and other Torah teachings) are not irrelevant or done away with as the infiltrated church teaches, but continue to be very relevant to how we should live, and will be much more important again if certain roadblocks are removed.
These posts would be the physical manifestation of those spiritual truths.
u/Tetartos_Ippeas
It’s actually much much easier to follow the food commandments than the clothing ones, on account of there not being much availability of clothing, and it being often fairly high priced compared to the petrochemical garbage.
Why? Because control was either given up or taken, or because it was just so easy to hand over.
I keep hearing supposed Christians talking about how doing things the right way would be way too inconvenient, or would not be good for too many people, or would make too many waves in the status quo…
THOSE ARE THE THINGS YOU SING ABOUT EVERY SUNDAY.
It gets on my nerves, man. I certainly don’t follow the Bible perfectly, but there’s resistance on directional will and intent from “believers” that I simply don’t get. Some of these resistances are more agreed on as being wrong, some less so, and the errancy much more entrenched.
It seems like there’s a mindset of “as long as faith doesn’t require any sacrifices on my part.”
Like, does anyone understand why we were given a model of the sacrificial system in the OT? Self-sacrifice is the foundation of faith… JESUS SACRIFICED HIMSELF ON THE CROSS AND WAS PRESENTED AS OUR MODEL. For crying out loud…. “More of you, and less of me (unless I mean that literally, in which case I love my life).”
I’m really not sure even the path I’ve chosen is the proper path, assuming im even walking it correctly. There’s things where I’m not sure even my attempts at adherence would be hitting the mark.
We’ll all find out…
🙏
I have a hunch “the church” is in process of moving away from “we have a building” and back to smaller, more home-based congregations.
Methodist is definitely a mess. Even my own movement has its issues, though thankfully not those, but there’s no avoiding wrestling with the consequences of adding or removing scripture, or neglecting some aspects.
Has always been an issue.
good thought, very relevant & will be much more important again…
departing from Egypt and then camping in the wilderness for about 40 yrs. ancient Israelites needed laws, guidance and instructions in order to survive.
Teachers often share definitions of Greek words, such as charis grace.
But rarely are Hebrew words like Torah defined. We’re told it means “the law” but it actually includes, teaching, guidance, and instructions. I think that in military encampment situations, God gave commands. Laws were set forth, and in some situations with strong penalties.
The people also needed guidance and instructions for living differently than when they were in slavery in Egypt.
Maybe Christ in Mt. 5:17-20 where it talks about Christ came not to “abolish” but to fulfill — could it be that Christ came not to end it, but to make it complete, whole, bring it to fullness? Showing how to live with God’s teachings, not as a list of do’s and dont’s as the rabbis made it (Isaiah 28:10) where God forewarned through Isaiah that if the people did not follow with their hearts, what was meant to be “not so difficult” (Deuteronomy 30:11-14) would be replaced by what the rabbis brought, burdensome long lists of regulations stacked upon God’s simple teachings.
I like to track and observe the 7 celebrations God gave in the books of Moses, but God provided the Lamb, I don’t need to sacrifice animals, and the grain offerings I think is symbolic of the harvest of souls who want to be in relationship with God.
yeah, clothing is expensive, Senator Ernest Hollings was the last of the ‘80s and ‘90s southern democrats who opposed globalism and giving away our textiles industry away, so that technology, the god of technocracy and transhumanism could take over.
Pretty much exactly how I’ve been looking at things for the last several years.
Not only is learning and doing The Teachings good for us, but not doing them or learning them is bad for us. They’re the foundation of everything that was taught by Jesus and the apostles. Money and business practices. Health. Sanctification. Addressing grievances. Caritas. Family. Prophetic timing. Identification of false prophets. Treating your servants. Farming and ranching. Courts. Avoiding idolatry. Recognizing when your nation is coming under a curse. (we are under quite a few right now!)
I recently got pretty upset when I realized I’d learned infinitely more about not giving or receiving bribes, or the importance thereof, from secular corporate training than I had from a lifetime of attending church, when the Bible talks about it fairly extensively.
… but to say we shouldn’t engage in bribery requires acknowledging The Teachings, or “The Law”, so we can’t do that. It’s a mess. I’ve been quite upset with the 501C3’s. “Not many of you should teach.”
“But the penalties for breaking the teachings were so steep! How can God be so fearsome?”
“I have good news, we have grace now. There was only imperfect grace before, through an imperfect system that still modeled our current one, but … that also could still be us, so take that fear and use it to avoid sin. Less sin is good. More sin is bad. Don’t sin!”
I sure hope it works better than the Iron Dome in Israel? Why would anyone compare this to the Iron Dome in Israel? Can't help the skepticism!
The Iron Dome system is for all levels of aerial or ballistic attack. It includes all the Arrow interceptors. Arrow 3 is capable of intercepting ICBMs up to an altitude of 100 km.
Not to anyone who has actually worked on the problem.