It doesn't help when our politicians and former administration officials go over there and give him moral support....they are a big part of the problem as far as the war never ending.....we must stop our people from offering support!!!! DJT can you please have a come to jesus meeting with Linda Graham.
You are absolutely correct and I've read that it violates the Logan Act, though I've not researched that. I think it is clear treason when they are working directly against the administration.
It was originally (and still is) a man's name in Scotland. Just as Shirley was originally a man's name in England and Ireland. (The phenomenon of female appropriation of male names?)
Acktually Lindsey was originally a surname. The phenomenon of first name appropriation of last names started to occur during the late 19th century. And in America, Lindsey has been used as a female name more than it has been used as a male name.
Well, there is the fact that only the legislative branch has the power to declare war, and war IS the ultimate foreign policy. But otherwise you are right.
It doesn't help when our politicians and former administration officials go over there and give him moral support....they are a big part of the problem as far as the war never ending.....we must stop our people from offering support!!!! DJT can you please have a come to jesus meeting with Linda Graham.
You are absolutely correct and I've read that it violates the Logan Act, though I've not researched that. I think it is clear treason when they are working directly against the administration.
Lindsey is already a girl's name.
It was originally (and still is) a man's name in Scotland. Just as Shirley was originally a man's name in England and Ireland. (The phenomenon of female appropriation of male names?)
Acktually Lindsey was originally a surname. The phenomenon of first name appropriation of last names started to occur during the late 19th century. And in America, Lindsey has been used as a female name more than it has been used as a male name.
It's not moral support those "leaders" are giving him
Foreign policy is NOT the purview of the Legislative Branch.
So why aren't they concerning themselves with their constituents instead of some foreign war that US (read CIA) meddling started?
Well, there is the fact that only the legislative branch has the power to declare war, and war IS the ultimate foreign policy. But otherwise you are right.
Yes, but they never do actually declare war. At least not on the enemies of the USA.