"Children under 18 not recommended to receive the Death and Infertility Jab" -- awesome. What great people they are, exempting kids from the toxic COVID pseudo-vaccines. Well, not actually PUSHING the pseudo-vaccines on the kids, at least. Kids can actually GET the Death and Infertility Jabs if their parents are still under the spell of the previous propaganda. So not a complete win, but a step in the right direction.
Wish people would put actual links to articles they're talking about and not just screenshots.
How much harder is it to include the actual article instead of a photo of...something?
Especially for an elite research board like this one...
Edited to add: I went to try to find this particular article and instead of finding it, I found this instead:
Vaccine preventable diseases
COVID-19
Information about COVID-19, vaccines and recommendations for vaccination from the Australian Immunisation Handbook.
This chapter is currently undergoing consultation and seeking National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) approval.
Vaccination for certain groups of people is funded under emergency measures, not by the National Immunisation Program or states and territories.
Should be not a human on earth should ever take the jab!!! People need to learn the real definition of words... mandate is a suggestion not an enforceable law. Plus no one can be f orced to take an experimental drug per the Nuremberg code.
"Children under 18 not recommended to receive the Death and Infertility Jab" -- awesome. What great people they are, exempting kids from the toxic COVID pseudo-vaccines. Well, not actually PUSHING the pseudo-vaccines on the kids, at least. Kids can actually GET the Death and Infertility Jabs if their parents are still under the spell of the previous propaganda. So not a complete win, but a step in the right direction.
Only the "healthy" ones. Apparently they want the "unhealthy" ones to still get it...
Good point. Half measure of a half measure (still pushing the jab on adults as well as "unhealthy" children).
Wish people would put actual links to articles they're talking about and not just screenshots.
How much harder is it to include the actual article instead of a photo of...something?
Especially for an elite research board like this one...
Edited to add: I went to try to find this particular article and instead of finding it, I found this instead:
Interesting.
https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/contents/vaccine-preventable-diseases/covid-19
https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/recommendations/healthy-infants-children-and-adolescents-aged
Should be not a human on earth should ever take the jab!!! People need to learn the real definition of words... mandate is a suggestion not an enforceable law. Plus no one can be f orced to take an experimental drug per the Nuremberg code.
Did they mandate children?
Yes. In order to be enrolled in school, it was compulsory.
They knew children were not at risk when they mandated it. Sounds like you need some woodchippers.
The slippery slope of "free" health care.
Your corrupt institutions are in no position to recommend or disincentivize anything. This is my life and not the governments.
Terrifying what "free" people have to live under.
So "healthy" infants children and adolescents aren't recommended to get it.
What about the "unhealthy" ones, then? Why are they still recommended to get it?
And most of us here knew very early, even before they rolled out the covid shots, that covid was not a danger to children!
https://x.com/_aussie17/status/1929892573755187658
No one should receive them!
Enjoy the show. Nyuk, nyuk.