https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114734424268466099
"Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered. There have been 14 missiles fired — 13 were knocked down, and 1 was “set free,” because it was headed in a nonthreatening direction. I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done. Most importantly, they’ve gotten it all out of their “system,” and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE. I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured. Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Ah yes, but let me guess, trying to get peace in the middle east is doing Israels bidding right?
Wow. Incredible. You just whitewashed all their funding and support of genocidal terrorists, Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. "That" doesn't make them evil?
If you’re taking my comment that way I wasn’t clear enough. My belief, based on the Q posts, is the Iranian regime are actually Cabal puppets. That, in and of itself makes them evil.
But, their support of terrorist organizations is, in fact, laundering money from their Cabal handlers to keep the region in turmoil. So again, their complicity with the Canal is what makes them evil wasn’t.
Cabal puppets? How could that ever be established? Membership card? Confession? It is all a mythological supposition. Something secret and unprovable is more evil than their deeds? Or enough evil that it is all we need to point to? If their deeds aren't evil enough, why claim that being a cabal puppet is culpable?
No cabal was running Iran, just the Ayatollah and his servants. Good, old-fashioned, bloodthirsty tyranny. No cabal required. Consider Occam's Razor.
If you follow the CIA's history, propping up violent regimes is their modus operandi. Fact of the matter the Ayatollahs funding of these terrorists groups allowed the military industrial complex to keep the perpetual war going in the middle east.
When you follow the fact pattern the only reason I can surmise from:
The American military leaving equipment and vehicles behind any time they withdraw from an area, munitions and supplies left for the terrorist groups.
Obama giving a pallet of cash directly to Iran.
Osama hiding out in the "close" ally Pakistan's backyard. Not to mention the hot bed of terrorism that is Pakistan itself.
There's probably more such actions others have found, but it seems to me that there really is a shady cabal of people who are propping up the Ayatollah regime.
Fact of the matter is the US has always had the capability to take down the Iranian regime. But the military industrial complex needs wars to happen.
Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq? It was not about winning at all.
An argument based on supposition is not argument; it is just a restatement of an unjustified belief.
Tacking on convenient coincidences also does not further an argument. This includes an Iran-friendly Obama administration (likely he was/is a sympathetic Muslim) and a Biden administration that was guided by workers behind the scenes. Iran can have allies without being governed by puppets, which was the original claim.
Having worked in the military-industrial complex for 40 years, I seriously doubt the canard that it needs these mini-wars in order to stay in business. Bombs and ammunition are not big ticket product lines, and do not engage the full technical capabilities of the major vendors.