Ok, I don't care for the fake numbers, no matter how disparate. OP claims it is 80% for vax, to 20% against. I bet the ratio is different, but that's beside the point. Even if it was 99% for, it still would not make any difference, because it is not a popular vote thing.
The point is: One has the right to refuse medical treatment under the Nuremberg code. This is to stop bad actors from using humans as guinea pigs - something Joseph Mendele was into, allegedly experimenting on Jewish prisoners. That means something.
There will always be people who don't want to partake in the 'experiment'. What are you gunna do about it? Force people to take a 'medicine' against their will? Oh wait, they tried that already [see above, oh and many politicians were preddy good at forcing people to take the Covid jabs - even as they claim it wasn't so, now].
Just for the record, when it comes to medication, It's not about what 'the majority' want. It's what the individual wants. Go ahead and stop the refusers from attending the schools, or public spaces - there will be still some people who will just find another way, rather than submit to the silliness.
He is a vaccine salesman and not a doctor. Two contradictory positions, but one he keeps pretending holds no sway over his shitty advice and recommendations.
A 'school vax requirement' is as retarded as a soda consumption mandate and a lot more deadly. Schools as it is are barely capable of teaching, why would you ever heed medical demands from purple haired and pierced weirdos that dont even know if they are a man or a woman?
Doesn't the vax protect against whatever disease it's supposed to protect from?
The debate for requirements should fall apart when the second question is answered. If you are for it, do it. If not, don't. Anything more is about power and control, not self-determination and health.
Ok, I don't care for the fake numbers, no matter how disparate. OP claims it is 80% for vax, to 20% against. I bet the ratio is different, but that's beside the point. Even if it was 99% for, it still would not make any difference, because it is not a popular vote thing.
The point is: One has the right to refuse medical treatment under the Nuremberg code. This is to stop bad actors from using humans as guinea pigs - something Joseph Mendele was into, allegedly experimenting on Jewish prisoners. That means something.
There will always be people who don't want to partake in the 'experiment'. What are you gunna do about it? Force people to take a 'medicine' against their will? Oh wait, they tried that already [see above, oh and many politicians were preddy good at forcing people to take the Covid jabs - even as they claim it wasn't so, now].
Just for the record, when it comes to medication, It's not about what 'the majority' want. It's what the individual wants. Go ahead and stop the refusers from attending the schools, or public spaces - there will be still some people who will just find another way, rather than submit to the silliness.
How enfuriating for the majority.
He is a vaccine salesman and not a doctor. Two contradictory positions, but one he keeps pretending holds no sway over his shitty advice and recommendations.
A 'school vax requirement' is as retarded as a soda consumption mandate and a lot more deadly. Schools as it is are barely capable of teaching, why would you ever heed medical demands from purple haired and pierced weirdos that dont even know if they are a man or a woman?
Well, why would the 80% care? Isn't a vaccine supposed to prevent your getting the disease if you encounter it?
This OP used to be the surgeon general.
Again, who cares if anyone else gets vaccinated?
Doesn't the vax protect against whatever disease it's supposed to protect from?
The debate for requirements should fall apart when the second question is answered. If you are for it, do it. If not, don't. Anything more is about power and control, not self-determination and health.