While watching everyone call it Big Beautiful Bill and thinking its the same as Build Back Better - BBB representing 666, it was annoying that many people never even bothered to check the full name of the Bill.
I assumed that since the full acronym is OBBB, it must represent 0666 or Zero the 666 - as in crash down the Cabal's Satanic plan.
It was u/Slyver who first pointed out to me that the first word One was already a number - so the Bill represents 1666 not 0666.
1666 is a BIG year no doubt, in the Cabal history, but there was specifically something big that happened that created the location which became the HQ of all Evil.
I am talking about the Great fire of London.
Compare the Map of the burnt area and the map of todays City of London
Basically, 80% of the "City of London" was burnt in 1666, and right in the center of the burnt area, Bank of England - the Cabal central bank - was established. This has always been the HQ of the Cabal, the plans for America was hatched here, plans for the World Wars to bring down christian monarchies, plans for Israel as a Jewish subsidiary of the central bankers - you name it. It all came from here.
So the OBBB Act, directly points us to the root of the Cabal, while the act itself dismantles this very same Cabal. As far as symbolism goes, one of the best!
To my note on “888 (and/not) 666?”, check out what happened in 1888!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1888_in_the_United_States
Cleanly ties in with
I like that it works both ways. The uppercase is built on top of the powers and consequences of the lowercase.
…
… has the whole of the last 150 years all been overlaid by asymmetric narrative warfare?
Why do you think it has only been 150 years? Clearly the same group has been controlling the narrative working towards a multi-century plan from before the "Revolutions" (American, French, ect.). A huge group of the people believe that the work towards these Revolutions were good. On the contrary, they were controlled opposition (some knowingly, some unknowingly), pretending to promote the work of Locke e.g. while subverting it. All you have to do is look, really look at the Constitution and the DOI and it's complete destruction of individual sovereignty. Look at the Laws themselves. Compare it to the Articles of Confederation and ask yourself who changed it and why. Look at what those people were really like. Not the narrative, but the actual history, the stuff they don't tell you in "school". Look into just Franklin e.g.; the narrative that he was a "average Joe." He was pure aristocrat and was almost certainly Cabal.
All of these narratives, our "history" and founding documents, created an illusion. I think some of the founding fathers were true believers but many were not. More than enough to create the Illusion through their laws and papers.
I can provide sufficient evidence that suggests that this same group has probably been controlling the narrative since the "Enlightenment" working towards what we have today, controlled the entire time (dig deep into Fugger).
Everything is controlled opposition, including the people who think this all started 150 years ago..."
I don’t.
Have traced the financial back 500-700 years, easy. It might have always been there for all I know.
For all I can tell, these people started taking power before Jesus whipped the money changers out of the temple.
Everything you said there is quite possibly true in some extent or another, and things that I do watch for.
Specifically noted that I don’t know when the “full public narrative warfare” side started. Maybe that was always there as well, and maybe even by the same people. “Pharaoh is a god” was a form of narrative warfare. “If you let us sacrifice these virgins by throwing them in this volcano it won’t erupt” (“oh my, it’s so tiring to get all the way up there, why don’t we just stop at this cave and ravish and kill them instead?”) was a form of narrative warfare.
I mean though, cross-nationally organized full-spectrum narrative warfare like we see now. Yes, I agree that it’s easily possible that it goes back to prior to the Renaissance as well. Just wondering out loud what he actual starting point was.
Thanks for the nice accusation in response to the complement! 😆 It’s all good though.
Never heard of “Fugger”, will look it up.
I think the same group (specific family) has been controlling the world through their True Government for at least 6000 years. However, I think the specific plan for the current version of the Matrix was begun somewhere around the time as you suggest.
I think that group (the Levites and associated Elite Jews) have been controlling the narrative through subversion for a while. Certainly before the creation (and subversion) of the Holy Roman Empire (Constantine), which I think was likely (financially) created to marry the Jewish religion with Jesus' teachings. Likely before the breaking of the Second Temple (and certainly soon after that). But there are hints that that same group may have been controlling a large part of the world since before the Iron Age. Indeed, I think the "Jews" (not called "Jews" at the time) were the Hyksos, and the "Exodus" wasn't a "Freedom" for the Jews from Egypt, but the Egyptians were freed from the Jews (specifically the group we call the Levites today, who were an imported "Tribe" (there used to be 10 Tribes)).
As something of an aside, though connected:
The group (family mentioned) that controls the world was called the Royal Scythians (or a family from the Arians if you prefer). I don't know if the Elite Jews were Arians at the time (say, since David/Solomon etc.). They might have been. It would make sense that they were, but I haven't been able to trace it yet. However, the Jews were married into the group we call the "Khazarians" shortly after a huge world wide catastrophe in 536 AD. That catastrophe was likely a valcanic eruption, but it darkened the world for years (I think it was called the "Dark Ages" because it was literally dark from that catastrophe). That darkness caused massive death from disease and other devastations (killing, etc.).
The Khazarians were actually the GokTurks, or the "Celestial Turks" or "Blue Browns" who migrated into that region after the catastrophe. These "Blue Browns" were a multi-cultural clan, consisting of both an Arian group with a ruling family of Arians of "Blues" (with blue/green eyes and blonde/red hair) and a brown group (called "Turks" which means Brown) making the majority of people. This group of Arians (a family of Arians) were called "Celestials" because they were believed to be Divine. Indeed, the concept of the Divine Right to Rule comes from this family. I have been able to track this family for 3000 years (with a lot of evidence that suggests 6000 years) all the way to today (see the original Merovingian (Clovis I think, or maybe his brother?) along with his genealogy of the Carolingians, with his claim of being a Royal Scythian and the acceptance of that claim by the Roman Church which gave him the right to rule).
This ruling class and their Khanate (kingdom) of Khazaria had as governors the Jews. I'm not sure why they had their cities governed by the Jews, perhaps they were there before the catastrophe. Regardless, the Elite Jews played a big part in the government. Indeed, the Jews intermarried into the Arians there, becoming a part of that Aristocracy (though they may have been already a part as mentioned earlier). The narrative that the Khazarians were "Jews in name only" is complete bullshit. The story that they chose Judaism to protect themselves from their neighbors is probably true, but it's only part of the truth, missing a huge part, and completely changing the story (controlled opposition).
Note, these Royal Scythians have been almost completely hidden from history. The most glaring edit was the erasure of the history of the Tartarians, who were just the group we call the "Mongolians" who were just a clan who took over all the other khanates (that happened quite often over history, that was a part of their system of Government). The leader of these Mongolians was called the "Tartarians" by the leader of that group (Genghis Khan), Genghis Khan had Green eyes, Red hair, and was a noted Royal Scythian, and according to every picture prior to the 19th century, had white skin. The Tartarian Empire was purposefully erased from history by the USSR, which just so happens to be the exact map of the original Tartarian Empire.
This is how history is "fixed" post Rockefeller Education.
It wasn't really intended to be an accusation but an explanation. I enjoy our conversations. It was more intended to be an expression of my frustration with the narrative. I should be more careful with my wording sometimes. That frustration is very powerful internally and I need to been more mindful when expressing myself.
No worries, I’m positive that I unintentionally do the same - hence the “It’s all good though.”
If you find solid connections on the Hyksos do let me know.
You may want to check the video I posted a few days ago as well, had some connections in these lines. Um. I don’t remember which one. Iirc one of these two talked about the Khazars, or… pretty sure it was the Islam one and the Dark Ages cause. In short, “the dark ages could have been caused by, essentially a paper shortage, resulting from Islam conquering Egypt.”
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZbdkbjN/how-do-you-become-a-nation-that-/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZbg0ZUa/the-islamic-conquest-of-europe--/c/
Khazaria was in something recent, too… trying to remember what.
“France fell in the 1400’s” when the Medicis married into the royalty of Lyon, which was alluded to, I think, in Back to the Future of all things.
The Nation video hits on one of many things I think Christianity has largely lost knowledge of how to live it out. Exceptional video, but yeah I don’t think it hits the point I had in mind. It was one of those “the thought ran away before I knew what it was” things, so this clarification is going to be muddled.
Added to my to-read list, thanks!
Ah. Merged into the House of Swabia.
Digging definitely needed.
Also, “where did ‘ficken’ come from?” Ha.
It depends on who you're asking. I think some people had the belief as promoted by the narrative; i.e. to create a republic akin to the city-states of the Greeks on a massive scale. However, there were too many people involved that were working towards the opposite, AKA the subversion of freedom and individual sovereignty while promoting the opposite through their laws and writings (including the Constitution/Bill of Rights/DOI) and their actions (not the ones you find in history class, or if you hear about them, they are glossed over ("it was a different time...").
So perhaps The Great Experiment (specifically the Matrix) for some of the "Founding Fathers", is working as intended (or was).
Its pretty amazing how these symbolisms work. They all have layers and layers of meanings. Thanks for pointing this!