The article states that she raped the CHILD, who was fourteen years old. Hmmm....Yeeeeeaaaaaa,......I can see her grabbing him, slamming him against the blackboard, tearing off his cloths, slapping him around, taking off her cloths and then proceeding with whatever. Do you really really think the kid walked away with his head in his hands, shaking his head with disgust, OR do you think he gathered his cloths, put them on, and then walked out of the classroom with the biggest smile on his face? I'm betting on the latter. And going back to the well forty five more times? He either liked the nookie or the beatings, and I don't think she beat him.
A. She was in a position of privilege, authority and power that she used to statutorily RAPE a CHILD. The law is the law. Will it be inequality if men can’t do the same?
B. She was married.
C. Her “husband” is a cuck. He should divorce her. She should go to jail and be on a sex offender’s list.
Yea, yea, yea...I know. I'm just looking it from the young lads point of view. Heck, every single high school male is always lusting after the teacher, especially the good looking ones. Back in my era there was NEVER an instance of a teacher doing untoward things to a student. Yet us guys always were looking at the teachers. It is just the animal instinct placed in us males. But in today's society it seems like every week I read of a female teacher taking advantage of a youth in her charge. What changed? Did our morals dimmish so much over three decades that we now can walk up to a hot female teacher and ask for sex and they say "Sure, you're cute!". Or did this behavior happen in my time and I just was too naive to notice it?
Imma be real, really take a hard look at your stance. I was 9 but my older cousin was sexually abusing me, I liked it in my kid brain. I even got off a few times. I wanted it and I liked who was doing it, again at the time. Does that make it less abuse? No. I was a CHILD, even if i was 14 its still not acceptable, as I am still a CHILD/MINOR. And its wrong for not just the incestrious aspect, but the fact that my older cousin was abusing me. I lost my virginity because if it. I never had the choice because I didnt know what sex was I was just told at first that we were having fun and playing as doctors. But hey I liked it and I kept going back. I guess that makes it better. Because I had a smile on my face after.
Seriously. I dont mean this to bash over your head. But your attitude/justification toward that is how more sexually fucked up people are made, I had to do a lot of work alongside GOD to heal the things that happened to me. Because what you wrote reads as no one cares about the abuse, at least you scored some.
Sex at an early age and / or outside of a committed relationship really messes people up. Unfortunately, most people don't realize how much. The evidence comes much later in the inability to pair bond, infidelity, broken relationships, sexual dysfunction, depression, etc. People have been brainwashed into believing otherwise.
What if it was your kid? Sounds like you would have approved of it. You're a fucking retard for even trying to justify this shit, and frankly should be deported.
So a child can give consent to sex? Thats why its rape if its a child reguardless. Because a child does not have the mental abilities to fully process what is going on. Its the same reason we say kids shouldn't be allowed transitions. They can be manipulated or dont know the full extent of the consequences yet because they are children. Also why children are charged differently depending on the crime.
So yes its forced sex because the child can not consent to it due to them being so young and not having that level of autonomy yet. Thus it is rape. There is the case of like 2 or 3 years age difference that can get tricky (i.e. 16yo gf 18yo bf) but thats not a teacher sleeping with a student. Thats adult and minor with power dynamics in play.
You missed my point. Legally, a violent forcible rape is different from statutory rape, with different definitions and penalties, precisely because there is a real difference: physical violence is qualitatively different from either seduction or coercion.
I don't pretend to know any details of this case beyond what the article says, nor am I justifying the teacher. I'm just saying we should have different conversational terms to describe the different situations.
I see what you mean, my apologies if I came off hostile I am just very passionate on this topic and I can come off harsh. But yes, there is a legal difference in statutory vs non statutory. However the basic definition of rape is as follows.
"The crime of using force or the threat of force to compel a person to submit to sexual intercourse."
Force isn't just violence. Force has a few definitions as well
"To compel through pressure or necessity."
Or
"To gain by the use of force or coercion."
So the teacher being an adult and a teacher aka authority over a child/minor and student. Coerced (seduced) him into sexual acts as a minor who is unable to give consent because of his minor status. Thus that is rape. That is why its just one term in this.
Now the statutory is the legal modifier for the way treating case is handled because it presumes the child/minor can not consent even if they are a willing participant. Violence is not a modifier for rape, though violent rape should also be charged with other assault and violence charges.
I hope that helps some. Its mt best understanding of it with some quick searches to make sure I was not way off in my thoughts haha.
Edit: my reasoning for not wanting to split the definition of rape of violent vs not is because the act itself if 1 violent. And 2 does that mean someone who is on a date and gets forced upon in a car or something where no blood is spilled but its still not wanted or consented is rape, then does that mean the charges should be less for that rape? I don't think so and id hope and think you don't either. If in conversation. Mention its violent or not. But legally it should be handled and charged all the same. Otherwise the victim who is inflicted with the same traumas regardless of the violence or not will not get the same level of justice for that trauma. Rape is traumatic regardless. And that's my personally I don't make a distinction of violent or not. Because to me its all violent.
Actual laws generally reflect the morality of society. But news and propaganda work hard to twist the definitions, to push society where it shouldn't go.
And having witnessed the bizarre (and very anti-male, everything from "all sex is rape" to expelling guys because a consenting woman regretted her consent a few weeks later) definitions cultivated on college campuses, I'm sensitive on the topic too.
Of course. Thats why I pulled definitions to make sure I was being as factual as possible. Trust me I was in college at the time when that was really kicking off. I was very much a flamboyant man at the time (God did a lot of work on me) but I was always worried and never let myself be alone with any peers let alone female ones.
Thats why I keep to the basic simple definition, not I didnt like the guy or girl after so im gonna ruin them. But its important we keep the word intact to mean what it truly is. So for example if this exact story was between two adults, its not an issue, yes she would have cheated or cucked her husband but she seduced and got what she wanted from an adult. But because its a minor there is no consent to be given, thus the act of seduction is in my opinion a form of force, preying on the potentually new (puberty) or never know sexually of a 14 year old, stripping innocence and/or sexually perverting the minor. And because of that it is rape by definition, again if looked at from my viewpoint.
This all hinges on the fact that this was a minor, who may have been willing, but is not legally or in my opinion mentally old enough to give consent. Especially to an adult. Again always exceptions for young love in high-school as they graduate kinda thing.
I hope we can all push back for the benefit of the kids and later adults who are harmed by these kinds of people. And what the media has done around that topic is disgusting. I wish it didnt take me as long as it did to finally realize after over a decade of struggle and trauma, that I needed help.
I appologize for the long replies I just have a lot to say haha. Hope all is well.
My teachers were in their 50's and made me learn stuff😔
Mine also.
kek "special services"
Definitely special tutoring.
This is school and teacher.
https://youtu.be/NYOQDnWFXYI?si=CtzLQGz8KDVwsgbi
Good one. Thanks.
Nice music.
He's a cuck.
Kek
Truly gone.
The article states that she raped the CHILD, who was fourteen years old. Hmmm....Yeeeeeaaaaaa,......I can see her grabbing him, slamming him against the blackboard, tearing off his cloths, slapping him around, taking off her cloths and then proceeding with whatever. Do you really really think the kid walked away with his head in his hands, shaking his head with disgust, OR do you think he gathered his cloths, put them on, and then walked out of the classroom with the biggest smile on his face? I'm betting on the latter. And going back to the well forty five more times? He either liked the nookie or the beatings, and I don't think she beat him.
Not the point;
A. She was in a position of privilege, authority and power that she used to statutorily RAPE a CHILD. The law is the law. Will it be inequality if men can’t do the same?
B. She was married.
C. Her “husband” is a cuck. He should divorce her. She should go to jail and be on a sex offender’s list.
Yea, yea, yea...I know. I'm just looking it from the young lads point of view. Heck, every single high school male is always lusting after the teacher, especially the good looking ones. Back in my era there was NEVER an instance of a teacher doing untoward things to a student. Yet us guys always were looking at the teachers. It is just the animal instinct placed in us males. But in today's society it seems like every week I read of a female teacher taking advantage of a youth in her charge. What changed? Did our morals dimmish so much over three decades that we now can walk up to a hot female teacher and ask for sex and they say "Sure, you're cute!". Or did this behavior happen in my time and I just was too naive to notice it?
1996- She was 34 and married. The student was 12.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Kay_Letourneau
Thats precisely what has happened!
Imma be real, really take a hard look at your stance. I was 9 but my older cousin was sexually abusing me, I liked it in my kid brain. I even got off a few times. I wanted it and I liked who was doing it, again at the time. Does that make it less abuse? No. I was a CHILD, even if i was 14 its still not acceptable, as I am still a CHILD/MINOR. And its wrong for not just the incestrious aspect, but the fact that my older cousin was abusing me. I lost my virginity because if it. I never had the choice because I didnt know what sex was I was just told at first that we were having fun and playing as doctors. But hey I liked it and I kept going back. I guess that makes it better. Because I had a smile on my face after.
Seriously. I dont mean this to bash over your head. But your attitude/justification toward that is how more sexually fucked up people are made, I had to do a lot of work alongside GOD to heal the things that happened to me. Because what you wrote reads as no one cares about the abuse, at least you scored some.
Please just give some thought on these words.
Sex at an early age and / or outside of a committed relationship really messes people up. Unfortunately, most people don't realize how much. The evidence comes much later in the inability to pair bond, infidelity, broken relationships, sexual dysfunction, depression, etc. People have been brainwashed into believing otherwise.
What if it was your kid? Sounds like you would have approved of it. You're a fucking retard for even trying to justify this shit, and frankly should be deported.
Even so, it's still wrong.
Yeah, we should have different words for this type of abuse. Rape implies forced sex without consent, which this wasn't.
So a child can give consent to sex? Thats why its rape if its a child reguardless. Because a child does not have the mental abilities to fully process what is going on. Its the same reason we say kids shouldn't be allowed transitions. They can be manipulated or dont know the full extent of the consequences yet because they are children. Also why children are charged differently depending on the crime.
So yes its forced sex because the child can not consent to it due to them being so young and not having that level of autonomy yet. Thus it is rape. There is the case of like 2 or 3 years age difference that can get tricky (i.e. 16yo gf 18yo bf) but thats not a teacher sleeping with a student. Thats adult and minor with power dynamics in play.
You missed my point. Legally, a violent forcible rape is different from statutory rape, with different definitions and penalties, precisely because there is a real difference: physical violence is qualitatively different from either seduction or coercion.
I don't pretend to know any details of this case beyond what the article says, nor am I justifying the teacher. I'm just saying we should have different conversational terms to describe the different situations.
I see what you mean, my apologies if I came off hostile I am just very passionate on this topic and I can come off harsh. But yes, there is a legal difference in statutory vs non statutory. However the basic definition of rape is as follows.
"The crime of using force or the threat of force to compel a person to submit to sexual intercourse."
Force isn't just violence. Force has a few definitions as well
"To compel through pressure or necessity."
Or
"To gain by the use of force or coercion."
So the teacher being an adult and a teacher aka authority over a child/minor and student. Coerced (seduced) him into sexual acts as a minor who is unable to give consent because of his minor status. Thus that is rape. That is why its just one term in this.
Now the statutory is the legal modifier for the way treating case is handled because it presumes the child/minor can not consent even if they are a willing participant. Violence is not a modifier for rape, though violent rape should also be charged with other assault and violence charges.
I hope that helps some. Its mt best understanding of it with some quick searches to make sure I was not way off in my thoughts haha.
Edit: my reasoning for not wanting to split the definition of rape of violent vs not is because the act itself if 1 violent. And 2 does that mean someone who is on a date and gets forced upon in a car or something where no blood is spilled but its still not wanted or consented is rape, then does that mean the charges should be less for that rape? I don't think so and id hope and think you don't either. If in conversation. Mention its violent or not. But legally it should be handled and charged all the same. Otherwise the victim who is inflicted with the same traumas regardless of the violence or not will not get the same level of justice for that trauma. Rape is traumatic regardless. And that's my personally I don't make a distinction of violent or not. Because to me its all violent.
No worries.
Actual laws generally reflect the morality of society. But news and propaganda work hard to twist the definitions, to push society where it shouldn't go.
And having witnessed the bizarre (and very anti-male, everything from "all sex is rape" to expelling guys because a consenting woman regretted her consent a few weeks later) definitions cultivated on college campuses, I'm sensitive on the topic too.
Of course. Thats why I pulled definitions to make sure I was being as factual as possible. Trust me I was in college at the time when that was really kicking off. I was very much a flamboyant man at the time (God did a lot of work on me) but I was always worried and never let myself be alone with any peers let alone female ones.
Thats why I keep to the basic simple definition, not I didnt like the guy or girl after so im gonna ruin them. But its important we keep the word intact to mean what it truly is. So for example if this exact story was between two adults, its not an issue, yes she would have cheated or cucked her husband but she seduced and got what she wanted from an adult. But because its a minor there is no consent to be given, thus the act of seduction is in my opinion a form of force, preying on the potentually new (puberty) or never know sexually of a 14 year old, stripping innocence and/or sexually perverting the minor. And because of that it is rape by definition, again if looked at from my viewpoint.
This all hinges on the fact that this was a minor, who may have been willing, but is not legally or in my opinion mentally old enough to give consent. Especially to an adult. Again always exceptions for young love in high-school as they graduate kinda thing.
I hope we can all push back for the benefit of the kids and later adults who are harmed by these kinds of people. And what the media has done around that topic is disgusting. I wish it didnt take me as long as it did to finally realize after over a decade of struggle and trauma, that I needed help.
I appologize for the long replies I just have a lot to say haha. Hope all is well.
Sicko
I would definitely advised against something like this especially if you have young boys.